9062
K. Elango et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 9059–9062
5. (a) Chandrasekhar, S.; Gopalaiah, K. Tetrahedron Lett.
2003, 44, 7437–7439; (b) Chandrasekhar, S.; Gopalaiah,
K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 755–756.
and 2c gave the best product yields compared to the
other ILs. The rearrangement of cyclohexanone oxime
was also carried out in all the ILs. The yield of e-capro-
lactam was high (78%) only when N-isopropylimidazoli-
um hexafluorophosphate (2c) was used. The isolation of
e-caprolactam was easier from 2c, which may be due to
the high solubility of this IL compared to e-caprolactam
in water. In the other cases, both the IL and e-
caprolactam were highly soluble in water, and hence
separation was difficult.
6. (a) Wang, B.; Gu, Y.; Luo, Y. C.; Yang, T.; Yang, L.; Suo,
J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3369; (b) De, S. K. J. Chem.
Res. 2004, 131; (c) De, S. K. Synth. Commun. 2004, 34,
3431; (d) Zhu, M.; Cha, C.; Deng, W.; Shi, X. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2006, 47, 4861; (e) Furuya, Y.; Ishihara, K.;
Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11240–
11241; (f) Ikushima, Y.; Hatakeda, K.; Sato, O.; Yokoy-
ama, T.; Arai, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1908–
1918; (g) Arisawa, M.; Yamaguchi, M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
311–312; (h) Sardarian, A. R.; Shahsavari-Fard, Z.;
Shahsavari, H. R.; Ebrahimi, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007,
48, 2639–2643.
7. (a) Sugden, S.; Wilkins, H. J. Chem. Soc. 1929, 1291–1298;
(b) Sundermeyer, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1965, 4,
222–239; (c) Robinson, J.; Osteryoung, R. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 323–327; (d) Volkov, S. V. Chem.
Soc. Rev. 1990, 19, 21–28; (e) Welton, T. Chem. Rev. 1999,
99, 2071–2083; (f) Wasserscheid, P.; Keim, W. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3772–3789; (g) Sheldon, R.
Chem. Commun. 2001, 2399–2407; (h) Dupont, J.; DeSo-
uza, R. F.; Suarez, P. A. Z. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 3667–
3692; (i) Parvulescu, V. I.; Hardacre, C. Chem. Rev. 2007,
107, 2615–2665; (j) Rantwijk, F. V.; Sheldon, R. A. Chem.
Rev. 2007, 107, 2757–2785.
In conclusion, an alternative method for the preparation
of N-isopropylimidazolium bromide has been reported.
The Beckmann rearrangement of three different ketoxi-
mes has been investigated using different ILs. The yields
were good for the rearrangement of acetophenone oxime
in all six ILs, whereas with dicyclopropyl ketoxime and
cyclohexanone oxime, good yields were obtained only
with N-isopropylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Department of Chemistry and
the Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur for infra-
structure and financial support.
8. (a) Peng, J.; Deng, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 403–405;
(b) Ren, R. X.; Zueva, L. D.; Ou, W. Tetrahedron Lett.
2001, 42, 8441–8443; (c) Gui, J.; Deng, Y.; Hu, Z.; Sun, Z.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 2681–2683; (d) Guo, S.; Du,
Z.; Zhang, S.; Li, D.; Li, Z.; Deng, Y. Green Chem. 2006,
8, 296–300.
Supplementary data
9. Seddon, K. R.; Stark, A.; Torres, M. Pure Appl. Chem.
2000, 72, 2275–2287.
ESI mass spectra for all ionic liquids are available. Sup-
plementary data associated with this article can be
10. (a) Wu, H. H.; Yang, F.; Cui, P.; Tang, J.; He, M. Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 4963–4965; (b) Siddiqui, S. A.;
Narkhede, U. C.; Palimkar, S. S.; Thomas, D.; Lahoti, R.
J.; Srinivasan, K. V. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 3539–3546; (c)
Zhu, H. P.; Yang, F.; He, M. Y. Green Chem. 2003, 5, 38;
(d) Gholap, A. R.; Chakor, N. S.; Daniel, T.; Lahoti, R.
J.; Srinivasan, K. V. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006, 245,
37–46; (e) Palanikumar, S. S.; Siddiqui, S. A.; Thomas, D.;
Lahoti, R. J.; Srinivasan, K. V. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
9371–9378.
11. Anantharaman, G.; Elango, K. Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-
Org. Nano-Metal Chem. 2007, 37, 719–723.
12. (a) Appler, H.; Neumann, W. P. J. Organomet. Chem.
1986, 314, 247–259; (b) Ohannesian, L. Tetrahedron Lett.
1988, 29, 2903–2906.
13. N-Isopropylimidazolium bromide (2a): In a two neck flask,
tert-butyl bromide (6.85 g, 50 mmol) was added to a
toluene (100 mL) solution of N-isopropylimidazole
(4.41 g, 40 mmol). The resulting mixture was heated to
80 °C for 16 h. The immiscible layers were separated by
decanting the toluene and the sticky product was washed
with hexane and dried under vacuum.
References and notes
1. (a) Oliver-Bourbigou, H.; Magna, L. J. Mol. Catal. 2002,
182–183, 419–437; (b) Jain, N.; Kumar, A.; Chauhan, A.;
Chauhan, S. M. S. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 1015–1060; (c)
Baudequin, C.; Baudoux, J.; Levillain, J.; Cahard, D.;
Gaumontb, A.; Plaqueventa, J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2003, 14, 3081–3093; (d) Jiajian, P.; Deng, Y. New J.
Chem. 2001, 25, 639–641; (e) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.;
Sreedhar, P. Green Chem. 2002, 4, 436–438; (f) Nadaf, R.
N.; Siddiqui, S. A.; Daniel, T.; Lahoti, R. J.; Srinivasan,
K. V. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2004, 214, 155–160; (g)
Chauvin, Y.; Mussmann, L.; Oliver, H. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2698–2700; (h) Song, C. E.; Roh,
E. J. Chem. Commun. 2000, 837; (i) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B.
V. S.; Reddy, C. S.; Rajasekhar, K. J. Org. Chem. 2003,
68, 2525–2527.
2. (a) Chung, Y. M.; Rhee, H. K. J. Mol. Catal. A 2000, 159,
389; (b) Climent, M. J.; Corma, A.; Iborra J. Mol. Catal.
2005, 233, 308–316; (c) Judd, W. R.; Katz, C. E.; Aube, J.
Sci. Synth. 2005, 21, 133–178.
3. Izumi, Y.; Sato, S.; Urabe, K. Chem. Lett. 1983, 12, 1649–
1652.
4. (a) Maheswari, R.; Shanthi, K.; Sivakumar, T.; Naraya-
nan, S. Appl. Catal., A: Gen. 2003, 248, 291; (b) Ishida,
M.; Suzuki, T.; Ichihashi, H.; Shiga, A. Catal. Today 2003,
87, 187.
General procedure for the synthesis of ILs (1b–d and 2b–d):
Ammonium tetrafluoroborate, potassium hexafluorophos-
phate, or silver triflate (15 mmol) was added to a solution
of 1a or 2a (15 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (25 mL)/CH3OH (5 mL).
The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for
3 h. The solution was cooled to ꢀ20 °C, filtered and the
volatiles were removed from the filtrate under vacuum to
afford the respective ionic liquids.
14. Prior to the Beckmann rearrangement, all the ionic liquids
were subjected to vacuum for half an hour to ensure
complete removal of water.