I. Taydakov et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 414 (2014) 234–239
235
4
5
2
. Experimental
Sc NMR (DMSO-d
m(cm ): 1657, 1540, 1465.
6
) d (ppm): 96.9.
ꢀ1
IR
2.1. General information
Ligand was synthesized by the previously described method
2.3. X-ray crystal data
[
12]. All other reagents were purchased from Aldrich and used
without further purification. Elemental analysis was performed
on the Elementar CHNO(S) analyzer.
Single crystals of 2a or 2b suitable for X-ray diffraction were ob-
tained by slow diffusion of MeCN vapor into saturated solution of 2
in DMSO or DMSO–EtOH (1/1 by volume) at the room temperature.
Crystals are not stable in air at the room temperature and lose the
solvent with crystal degeneration easily.
Two different crystal modifications (solvatomorphs [14]) of
complex 2 were obtained from different solvents. Rhombohedral
crystals of 2 ꢂ 3MeCN solvate (2a) were obtained from MeCN–
DMSO mixture while monoclinic crystals of 2 ꢂ MeCN ꢂ EtOH (2b)
were formed in the presence of EtOH. All diffraction data were
collected on the Bruker SMART APEX II CCD diffractometer [k(Mo
Special reagents and ITO coated glass slides (resistance 10–
1
(
5
X
/sq) for OLED fabrication were purchased from Lumtec Corp.
Taiwan).
UV–Vis absorption spectra were recorded on the Perkin-Elmer
Lambda 45 instrument. Luminescent spectra were obtained on
the Perkin-Elmer SL-45 spectrofluorimeter equipped with a fiber
optics probe and xenon flash lamp.
Nanotechnology-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-
flight mass spectrometry spectra (NALDI-TOF-MS) were obtained
on the Bruker Autoflex Speed instrument equipped with nitrogen
pulse laser (337 nm). Samples in form of 2 mg/mL solutions in
EtOH were dropped on the surface of the nano-structured target
Ka) = 0.071072 nm, x-scans]. The substantial redundancy in data
allows empirical absorption correction to be performed with SADABS
[15,16], using multiple measurements of equivalent reflections.
The structures were solved by a direct method and refined by
(
Bruker MSP 96 NALDI target) and dried. Spectra were collected
2
in a positive mode.
the full-matrix least-squares technique against F in the aniso-
TGA-DSC analysis was performed on the Netzsch STA 449C
tropic approximation for all non-hydrogen atoms. In the crystal
of solvate 2b for the disordered ligand (see Fig. 1 in Supplemen-
tary) the refinement was performed with additional constraints
on C–C, C–O and C–N bond lengths and anisotropic displacement
parameters of corresponding atoms.
instrument in Al
00 °C (293–1173 K). Heating rate was 10 K/min, mixture of air
40 mL/min) and Ar (20 mL/min) was used as an oxidation
2 3
O crucibles in the temperature range 20–
9
(
environment.
FTIR spectra were obtained on the Bruker Vector 22 instrument
in KBr pellets.
The positions of hydrogen atoms were calculated and refined
with the riding model in the isotropic approximation. In crystals
of solvate 2b the analysis of the Fourier electron density synthesis
has revealed that solvate molecules are strongly disordered and
with high probability the observed electron density maxima can
be attributed to superposition of ethanol and acetonitrile. We
failed to establish appropriate model for refining of the above
residual electron density corresponding to this molecules. That is
why we had to exclude unresolved solvents by means of SQUEEZE
procedure [17]. Taking into account that disordered ligand pre-
dominantly forms intermolecular interactions with superimposed
solvate it is reasonable to propose that observed disorder of the lat-
ter is the consequence of intermolecular interactions.
6
NMR study was performed in DMSO-d solutions at 298 K on
the Bruker DXR-500 instrument operating at 500.1, 125.8 and
1
13
45
1
(
21.5 MHz for H,
d = 0.00 ppm) was used for 1H and C NMR measurements as a
2
internal standard, and 1.5 M solution of Sc(NO * 5H O in D O
C
and
Sc nucleus respectively. TMS
13
3
)
3
2
4
5
at pH 1 was used as external standard (d = 0.0 ppm) [13] for Sc
NMR measurements.
Current–voltage–brightness characteristics of the organic LEDs
were measured on the Keithley (Keithley, USA) digital multimeter
and the TKA (Russia) luminance meter. The electroluminescence
and photoluminescence spectra were measured on the multi-chan-
nel spectrometer S2000 (Ocean Optics, USA).
All calculations were performed with the SHELXTL software pack-
age [16].
3
2.2. Synthesis and characterization of complex 2 (ScL )
Solution of ScCl
3
was prepared by treatment of Sc
2
O
3
(1.0 g,
2.4. OLED device fabrication
7
.25 mmol) with pure conc. HCl, evaporation of the reaction mass
to dryness and dissolution of the residue in deionized water in a
volumetric flask. Overall volume was brought to 10 mL.
In this study a series of multilayer OLED structures with the
ScL as an emissive layer was prepared. Conductive layer – PED-
3
OT:PSS (poly-ethylene dioxythiophene:poly-styrenosulphonate)
In 7 mL of ethanol 0.575 g (2.17 mmol) of HL was dissolved. To
this solution 0.5 mL (0.725 mmol) of ScCl
3
solution was added with
and a hole transport layer – TPD (N,N-diphenyl-N,N-bi(3-methyl-
0
0
stirring and pH was adjusted to 9 by the carefully addition of aque-
ous ammonia. The reaction mixture was held at 50 °C for 2 h,
cooled and the precipitate was filtered and washed successively
by small portions of water, 30% aqueous ethanol and ether and fi-
phenyl)-[1,1 -diphenyl]-4,4 -diamine) were deposited by the solu-
tion spin-coating technique. The electron transporter layer – TAZ
(3-(4-biphenyl)-4-phenyl-5-tert-butylphenyl-1,2,4-triazole), Alq
3
ꢀ2
nally dried at 10 Torr and 45 °C to a constant weight. Yield of the
white crystalline powder is 0.27 g (53%).
Analytical sample was recrystallized from DMSO–CH
2 2
Cl mix-
ture, washed with CH Cl and dried to a constant weight under
2
2
ꢀ2
the diminished pressure (1 ꢁ 10 Torr).
Elemental analysis: Anal. Calc. for C39
45 12 6
H N O Sc: C, 56.93; H,
5
.51; N, 20.43; Sc, 5.46. Found: C, 57.07; H, 5.79; N, 20.67, Sc, 5.51%.
1
H NMR (DMSO-d
6
) d (ppm): 7.95 (br. s, 6H, Pyr–H), 5.9 (s, 3H,
), 2.30 (s, 18H, CH ).
) d (ppm): 177.83 (C@O), 149.96 (C(3)Pyr),
32.09 (C(5)Pyr), 126.61 (C(4) Pyr), 95.54 (CH@), 38.19 (N–CH ),
3.73 (CH ).
C@CH), 3.70 (s, 18H, N–CH
3
3
1
3
C NMR (DMSO-d
6
1
1
3
3
Fig. 1. Synthesis of complex 2.