dichloromethane also lead to full conversion within 20 h, but
somewhat lower ees were observed. As a general trend, it was
found that longer reaction times were required to reach full
conversion when using L1 as compared to L2, whereas the ees were
similar with both ligands.
Under the optimized conditions, a number of unsaturated
malonates were tested (Table 3). For linear alkyl substituents,
excellent ees of up to 96% and full conversion within 25 h were
achieved (entries 1–13). A second substituent at the g-position
lowers the reactivity of the system (entries 14–19); however, for the
isopropyl-substituted malonic ester 1e, an excellent ee of 98% was
obtained using ligand L1 in toluene. With the exception of substrate
1f, in general, L1 gave slightly higher ees than L2.
Table 3 Asymmetric conjugate addition of dimethylzinc to unsaturated
malonic esters 1b–1fa
Con-
Di-
version Time/ eeb
Entry ester
R
Ligand Solvent
(%)
h
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1b
1b
1b
1b
1b
1c
1c
1c
1c
1d
1d
1d
1d
1e
1e
1e
1e
1f
Pr
Pr
Pr
Pr
Pr
Et
Et
Et
Et
L1
L2
L1
L2
L1
L1
L2
L1
L2
Toluene
Toluene
Heptane
Heptane
100
98
98
21
4
95
94
96
96
94
96
92
92
90
86
82
66
42
98
96
n.d.
n.d.
90
94
21
20
21
24
24
24
24
2
25
25
25
68
68
68
68
25
25
100
Diethyl ether 100
Scheme 4 Reagents and conditions: (a) 2 mol% Cu(OTf)2, 4 mol% L1, 1.5
eq. Me2Zn, toluene, 260 °C; (b) LiCl, H2O, DMF; (c) DiBAL-H; (d) Dess–
Martin oxidation; (e) diethyl malonate, pyridine, Ac2O; (f) 3 mol%
Cu(OTf)2, 6 mol% L1, 1.5 eq. Me2Zn, toluene, 260 °C; (g) 3 mol%
Cu(OTf)2, 6 mol% ent-L2, 1.5 eq. Me2Zn, toluene, 260 °C; (h) LiCl, H2O,
DMSO.
Toluene
Toluene
Heptane
Heptane
Toluene
Toluene
Heptane
Heptane
Toluene
Toluene
Heptane
Heptane
Toluene
Toluene
100
100
80
45
98
100
98
97
60
42
10
8
(CH2)2Ph L1
(CH2)2Ph L2
(CH2)2Ph L1
(CH2)2Ph L2
iPr
iPr
iPr
iPr
1-Furyl
1-Furyl
provides a powerful tool in the new iterative scheme to syn and anti
products (Scheme 4).
L1
L2
L1
L2
L1
L2
In summary, we have shown that excellent stereocontrol can be
achieved in the catalytic conjugate addition of dimethylzinc to
unsaturated malonic esters and that the methodology can be applied
iteratively, thus allowing the construction of either syn- or anti-
3,5-dimethyl carbonyl compounds.
80
57
1f
a All conjugate additions run at 260 °C. b The configuration of the major
product was determined by comparison of the optical rotation with literature
data (see ESI†). n.d.: not determined.
This project was financially supported by the European Network
COMBICAT (HPRN-CT-2000-00014).
Notes and references
An attractive aspect of the new methodology is that it provides
the basis for an iterative catalytic protocol (Scheme 3). In this way,
the stereoselective construction of 3,5-dimethyl carbonyl motifs
can be achieved, which are common in numerous naturally
occurring compounds.10
1 (a) N. Krause and A. Hoffmann-Roder, Synthesis, 2001, 171–196; (b) B.
L. Feringa, R. Naasz, R. Imbos and L. A. Arnold, in Modern
Organocopper Chemistry, ed. N. Krause, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2002; (c) A. Alexakis and C. Benhaim, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2002,
3221–3236.
2 (a) B. L. Feringa, M. Pineschi, L. A. Arnold, R. Imbos and A. H. M. de
Vries, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 2620–2623; (b) I. H.
Escher and A. Pfaltz, Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 2879–2888; (c) H.
Mizutani, S. J. Degrado and A. H. Hoveyda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002,
124, 779–781; (d) A. Duursma, A. J. Minnaard and B. L. Feringa, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 3700–3701.
Scheme 3 Iterative 1,4-addition.
3 (a) M. Kanai, Y. Nakagawa and K. Tomioka, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55,
3843–3854; (b) M. Yan, L.-W. Yang, K.-Y. Wong and A. C. S. Chan,
Chem. Commun., 2000, 115–116; (c) M. T. Reetz, A. Gosberg and D.
Moulin, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 1189–1191.
4 J. P. G. Versleijen, A. M. Leusen van and B. L. Feringa, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1999, 40, 5803–5806.
5 A. Alexakis and C. Benhaim, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2001, 12,
1151–1157.
6 A. W. Hird and A. Hoveyda, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42,
1276–1279.
Thus, diethyl propylidene malonate (1c) was subjected to an
asymmetric conjugate addition providing, after decarboxylation,
(S)-ethyl 3-methylpentanoate (3c) in excellent yield and enantiose-
lectivity (Scheme 4). A sequence involving reduction of the ester
moiety to the corresponding alcohol, oxidation to the aldehyde and
subsequent Knoevenagel condensation gave access to unsaturated
diester 4. Subjecting 4 to a second catalytic asymmetric conjugate
addition, again using ligand L1 (configuration S,R,R) resulted in the
syn-dimethylated product (S,S)-5, with an excellent selectivity of
97 : 3. With ligand ent-L2 (configuration R,S,S) in the second
conjugate addition, the other diastereomer, anti-(S,R)-6 was formed
and, again, very high selectivity (dr 97 : 3) was observed. The
diastereoisomers 5 and 6 can easily be distinguished by NMR, GC
and optical rotation (see ESI†). Apparently, the stereocenter present
in substrate 4 has no influence on the stereochemical outcome of the
second conjugate addition step. This nearly complete stereocontrol
governed by the chiral catalyst in subsequent 1,4-additions
7 B. L. Feringa, Acc. Chem. Res., 2000, 33, 346–353.
8 In accordance with observations by Alexakis et al. (see ref. 5), we found
modest ees for the addition of Et2Zn to malonates 1, attributed to a
significant uncatalyzed reaction.
9 A. P. Krapcho, Synthesis, 1982, 805–822.
10 See (a) A. Gambacorta, D. Tofani, P. Lupattelli and A. Tafi,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 2195–2198 and references therein; (b) N.
Tabata, Y. Ohyama, H. Tomoda, T. Abe, M. Namikoshi, Y. Yamaguchi,
R. Masuma and S. Omura, J. Antibiot., 1999, 52, 815–826; (c) M. A.
Calter and W. Liao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 127–129.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 7 9 2 – 7 9 3
793