by a phenolic hydrogen through an intramolecular hydrogen
thereby inducing the hyperchromic effect and fluorescence
enhancement.
We investigated the H NMR spectra of the dosimeter 1
9
10
bond. Resonance-assisted hydrogen bonding (RAHB) is
one of the driving forces for the reactions, as observed in
pyridoxal phosphate.11
1
in the presence of cyanide anions and compared it with that
Herein, we report a selective fluorescent chemodosimeter
a
of the sensor itself (Figure 1). The aldehyde proton (H ) at
1
for cyanide ion detection (Scheme 1). The dosimeter 1
Scheme 1. Structure of the Dosimeter and Its Proposed
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectral change of the dosimeter upon addition
of cyanide anions: (a) sensor only and (b) sensor and 10 equiv of
NaCN ([1] ) 10 mM in D O at 25 °C).
2
has a coumarin group as a fluorescent signal unit and a
salicylaldehyde functionality as a recognition or reaction unit.
around δ 10.1 ppm was dramatically shifted upfield toward
δ 6.1 ppm (H ) upon cyanide addition at room temperature.
This chemical shift of H was consistent with a cyanohydrin
b
For this aim, the dosimeter 1 was synthesized according to
the literature procedure.12
b
form due to the nucleophilic attack of the cyanide anion
Cyanide is expected to be detectable by a nucleophilic
attack toward a carbonyl functional group, which has been
activated by the phenol proton of the dosimeter 1 through
the intramolecular hydrogen bonding. Fast proton transfer
of the phenol hydrogen to the developing alkoxide anion
causes the strong fluorescence of the sensor (Scheme 1), as
previously studied by a chromogenic cyanide dosimeter based
on salicylaldehyde. It has been shown that the deprotonation
of the phenol proton upon the addition of cyanides created
a color change due to the bathochromic shift in the azo-
based dosimeter.13 However, with the present dosimeter,
cyanide anions operate as a nucleophile toward the sensor,
1
toward the dosimeter’s carbonyl group. H NMR analysis
indicated that the cyanide anion functions as a nucleophile
in water.
These cyanide-sensing phenomena were monitored by
fluorescence titration in an aqueous solvent (HEPES buffer
at pH 7.4). Fluorescence monitoring of the cyanide addition
reaction was performed by using a 10 µM solution of the
dosimeter 1 in water under biological pH at room temper-
ature. Upon addition of cyanide anions, the fluorescence
emission intensity of the dosimeter at λem ) 450 nm was
increased 190-fold and was saturated at 1500 equiv of
cyanide (Figure 2, Figure S1). Job analysis for the complex-
(6) (a) Brz o´ zka, Z. In ComprehensiVe Supramolecular Chemistry;
Atwood, J. L., Davies, J. E. D., MacNicol, D. D., V o¨ gtle, F., Suslick, K.
S., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1996; Vol. 1, pp 187-212. (b) Desvergne,
J.-P.; Czarnik, A. W. Chemosensors of Ion and Molecular Recognition;
Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997; Vol. 492. (c) Schmidtchen, F.
P.; Berger, M. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 1609-1646. (d) Beer, P. D. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1998, 31, 71-80. (e) Binachi, K.; Bowman-James, K.; Garc ´ı a-Espa n˜ a,
E. Supramolecular Chemistry for Anions; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1997.
(
f) Lehn, J.-M. Supramolecular Chemistry, Concepts and PerspectiVes;
VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1995. (g) Mart ´ı nez-M a´ n˜ ez, R.; Sancenon, F.
Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 4419-4476. (h) Beer, P. D.; Gale, P. A. Angew.
Chem. 2001, 113, 502-532; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 486-516.
(7) (a) Fabbrizzi, L.; Poggi, A. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1995, 24, 197-202. (b)
Valeur, B.; Leray, I. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2000, 205, 3-40. (c) Anslyn, E.
V. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3, 740. (d) Fabbrizzi, L.; Licchelli, M.;
Pallavicini, P.; Parodi, L.; Taglietti, A. Transition Metals in Supramolecular
Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: New York, 1999; p 93. (e) Lakowicz,
J. R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy; Plenum Publishers Corpora-
tion: New York, 1999.
(
8) (a) Badugu, R.; Lacowikcz, J. R.; Geddes, C. D. Anal. Biochem. 2004,
27, 82-90. (b) Badugu, R.; Lacowikcz, J. R.; Geddes, C. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 3635-3641. (c) Tomasulo, M.; Raymo, F. M. Org. Lett.
005, 7, 4633-4636.
9) Albayrak, C.; Odabasoglu, M.; B u¨ y u¨ kg u¨ ng o¨ r, O.; L o¨ nnecke, P. Acta
Crystallogr. 2004, C60, o318.
3
Figure 2. Fluorescence titration spectra of the dosimeter upon
2
addition of cyanide anion. Inset: Fluorescence change of the sensor
(
-
against [CN ]/[1] ([1] ) 10 µM, λex ) 360 nm, λem ) 450 nm).
(
(
10) Gust, R.; Sch o¨ nenberger, H. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 28, 103.
11) Dugas, H. Bioorganic Chemistry: A Chemical Approach to Enzyme
Action, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, 1996; pp 520-542.
ation of the sensor and cyanide also corroborated the 1:1
binding stoichiometry (Figure S4).
To evaluate the selectivity of the dosimeter 1 for cyanide,
we monitored the fluorescence intensities for various anions
(
12) (a) Sp a¨ th, E.; Pailer, M. Chem. Ber. 1935, 68, 940-943. (b)
Ramasay, S. L.; Freeman, C.; Grace, P. B.; Redmond, J. W.; MacLeod, J.
K. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 333, 59-71.
(
13) Lee, K.-S.; Lee, J. T.; Hong, J.-I.; Kim, H.-J. Chem. Lett. 2007, 36,
8
16-817.
50
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 1, 2008