Table 1. Initial Optimization Experiments
no.
conditions
KCN, toluene, TMEDA
CuCN, DMF, TMEDA
Zn(CN)2, DMF, TMEDA
K4Fe(CN)6, DMF, K3PO4, TMEDA, 85 °C
K3Fe(CN)6, DMF, K3PO4, TMEDA, 85 °C
K4Fe(CN)6, DMF, K3PO4, no TMEDA, 85 °C
K4Fe(CN)6, DMF, K3PO4, no TMEDA, air, 85 °C
GCY,a,b
8
%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
36 (71)
23 (63)
44 (84)
41 (81)
Figure 1. 1,8-Bis(diisopropylphosphino)triptycene.
a GC-based yield after 6 h at 85 °C. b Yield in parentheses indicates the
GCY after 24 h at 85 °C.
was claimed, the amines serve as co-ligands to allow an
additional stabilization of the palladium catalysts.8
Finally, the employment of nontoxic cyanide sources such
as potassium hexacyanoferrate9 makes the palladium-
catalyzed cyanation of aryl halides an attractive laboratory
method.
It is worth noting that despite the diversity of the reported
protocols the general reaction conditions remain rather harsh
(120-140 °C). As was suggested, the high reaction temper-
ature needed stems from either a slow oxidative addition (due
to cyanide interfering)6-8 or a transmetalation step (when
ferrocyanides are used).9
employed. Second, the wide bite of the ligand may also assist
the reductive elimination11 of the resulting benzonitrile from
the palladium center. Indeed, several theoretical and experi-
mental studies indicate that this step might also be prob-
lematic.12
Thus, our initial experiments comprised attempts to
accomplish the reaction between 1-bromonaphthalene and
different cyanide sources at 85 °C in the presence of 1 mol
% of PdCl2(L1) (Table 1).
Recently, we reported the synthesis and characterization
of a new class of strongly bent trans-spanning diphosphine
ligands based on the triptycene scaffold that exhibited unique
coordination chemistry and promising catalytic activity in
cross-coupling reactions (Figure 1 (left)).10 Inter alia, we
found that the palladium geometry in PdCl2(L1) (Figure 1
(right)) is strongly distorted from the expected square planar
geometry toward a rare butterfly-like environment (P-Pd-P
and Cl-Pd-Cl angles are 154.871(17)° and 174.90(2)°,
respectively). In principle, this arrangement around the
catalytic site might be particularly beneficial in the described
transformation. First, we assumed that the unique bent
structure of the ligand may provide an effective protection
of the transition metal center from the premature contact with
inhibiting cyanide ions thus enhancing the reactivity of the
catalyst at milder temperatures. One can expect that the effect
would be more pronounced if bulky cyanide carriers are
Upon examination of various solvent/base/cyanide com-
binations we found that the reaction indeed proceeds under
mild heating when either K4Fe(CN)6 or K3Fe(CN)6 in DMF
are used (entries 4 and 5, Table 1). This is especially
remarkable because previous reports claimed that the cyanide
transfer from K4Fe(CN)6 is difficult below 120 °C.9 Interest-
ingly, unlike previously reported procedures, our catalyst
does not require the co-assistance of amine ligands (TMEDA,
DBU, etc.). In contrast, their effect on the reaction was
somewhat deleterious (entry 4 vs entry 6, Table 1).
Furthermore, we found that our catalytic system is
perfectly stable to air and the reaction can be performed
without rigorous exclusion of oxygen. Only slightly reduced
yields were observed when air- and nitrogen-filled reactions
were run side by side (entry 6 vs entry 7, Table 1).
Noteworthily, cheap and readily accessible DMF can be
used as the solvent to perform the desired reaction: normally,
notable decomposition of DMF under the harsh and basic
reaction conditions takes place prompting researchers to
employ less convenient N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) or N,N-
dimethylacetamide (DMAC) which may complicate the
isolation of products.9c
(6) (a) Tschaen, D. M.; Desmond, R.; King, A. O.; Fortin, M. C.; Pipik,
B.; King, S.; Verhoeven, T. R. Synth. Commun. 1994, 24, 887. (b) Okano,
T.; Kiji, J.; Toyooka, Y. Chem. Lett. 1998, 425. (c) Maligres, P. E.; Waters,
M. S.; Fleitz, F.; Askin, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8193. (d) Sakamoto,
T.; Ohsawa, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 2323. (e) Jin, F.;
Confalone, P. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3271. (f) Veauthier, J. M.;
Carlson, C. N.; Collis, G. E.; Kiplinger, J. L.; John, K. D. Synthesis 2005,
2683.
(7) (a) Cassar, L.; Ferrara, S.; Foa, M. AdV. Chem. Ser. 1974, 132, 252.
(b) Sundermeier, M.; Zapf, A.; Beller, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003,
42, 1661. (c) Sundermeier, M.; Mutyala, S.; Zapf, A.; Spannenberg, A.;
Beller M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2003, 684, 50.
(8) Sundermeier, M.; Zapf, A.; Mutyala, S.; Baumann, W.; Sans, J.;
Weiss, S.; Beller M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 9, 1828.
(9) (a) Schareina, T.; Zapf, A.; Beller, M. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1388.
(b) Schareina, T.; Zapf, A.; Beller, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689,
4567. (c) Weissman, S. A.; Zewge, D.; Chen, C. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
1508.
Further experiments, which aimed at the discovery of the
optimum reaction conditions, revealed that 0.5-1 mol % of
(11) (a) Gillie, A.; Stille, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4933. (b)
Kohara, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamamoto, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1980, 192,
265. (c) Brown, J. M.; Guiry, P. J. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1994, 220, 249. (d)
Marcone, J. E.; Moloy, K. G. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 8527. (e)
Stockland, R. A., Jr.; Levine, A. M.; Giovine, M. T.; Guzei, I. A.; Cannistra,
J. C. Organometallics 2004, 23, 647.
(12) (a) Backvall, J.-E.; Bjorkman, E. E.; Petterson, L.; Siegbahn, P. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 7265. (b) Goldberg, K. I.; Yan, J.; Breitung, E.
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6889. (c) Huang, J.; Haar, C. M.; Nolan,
S. P.; Marcone, J. E.; Moloy, K. G. Organometallics 1999, 18, 297.
(10) Grossman, O.; Azerraf, C.; Gelman, D. Organometallics 2006, 25,
375.
1190
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 6, 2006