Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 4 of 5
DOI: 10.1039/C7CC09518J
COMMUNICATION
ChemComm
Microbiology Culture Collection. The authors also thank the
Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis at The
University of Western Australia, which is supported by
University, State and Federal Government funding. KAS and
JSM also thank the Australian Research Council for funding
(
FT100100291 and FT120100013 respectively). MDW thanks
the University of Western Australia for a UWA Alumni SWANS
Rural Scholarship and Research Training Program
a
Scholarship. MGC is supported by a University Postgraduate
Award for International Students and a Scholarship for
International Research by the University of Western Australia.
AWD thanks the National Health and Medical Research Council
for funding (APP1073250). AM is supported by the
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK
(BB/P012523/1) and the John Innes Foundation. NFW is
supported by a CASE studentship from the BBSRC and
Inspiralis. This work was also funded in part by a Bayer AG
division Crop Science Grants4Targets grant 2016-01-55 to JSM,
KAS and AM.
Figure 4. Representative testing assay of analogues which showed herbicidal activity
Conflicts of Interest
(
IC50 <25 mg/L), against wild-type (WT) and gyra-3 mutant A. thaliana. Testing was
conducted as described in Figure 2B and images were taken at day 20 of growth.
There are no conflicts to declare.
1
1
a ciprofloxacin resistant A. thaliana mutant (gyra-3), which
Notes and references
has a point mutation that causes an amino acid substitution in
its encoded ATGYRA, to confirm these compounds were on 1. S. B. Powles and Q. Yu, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 2010, 61, 317.
target, affecting only the DNA gyrase protein in vivo (Figure 4). 2. L. P. Gianessi, Pest Manag. Sci., 2013, 69, 1099.
3
4
5
6
.
.
.
.
S. O. Duke and S. B. Powles, Pest Manag. Sci., 2008, 64, 319.
S. O. Duke, Pest Manag. Sci., 2012, 68, 505.
N. Bush, K. Evans-Roberts and A. Maxwell, in EcoSal Plus, 2015.
M. Gellert, K. Mizuuchi, M. H. O'Dea and H. A. Nash, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 1976, 73, 3872.
The results are highly suggestive that DNA gyrase is the sole
target as the mutants demonstrate an increased resistance to
not only ciprofloxacin
1, but also to the analogues. To further
confirm that these compounds act in a similar manner to
ciprofloxacin
1
,
DNA cleavage assays were conducted. 7. G. A. Jacoby and D. C. Hooper, in Antibiotic Discovery and
Development, eds. T. J. Dougherty and M. J. Pucci, Springer US,
Fluoroquinolones, such as 1, inhibit DNA gyrase by stabilising
Boston, MA, 2012, pp. 119.
the covalent complex that forms between the enzyme and
6
DNA and such complexes can be detected as a linear band in
8
.
H. S. Cho, S. S. Lee, K. D. Kim, I. Hwang, J. Lim, Y. Park and H. Pai,
Plant Cell, 2004, 16, 2665.
agarose gel electrophoresis. The most herbicidal compounds 9. M. K. Wall, L. A. Mitchenall and A. Maxwell, Proc. Natl. Acad.
were assayed (Supporting Figure 2B) and found to be able to
Sci. USA, 2004, 101, 7821.
1
1
0. C. V. Morgante, R. A. O. Rodrigues, P. A. S. Marbach, C. M.
Borgonovi, D. S. Moura and M. C. Silva-Filho, Mol. Genet.
Genomics, 2009, 281, 525.
1. K. M. Evans-Roberts, L. A. Mitchenall, M. K. Wall, J. Leroux, J. S.
Mylne and A. Maxwell, J. Biol. Chem., 2016, 291, 3136.
stabilise the gyrase cleavage complex with both E. coli and A.
thaliana gyrase, similar to ciprofloxacin 1, suggesting that they
all act by a similar mechanism.
In conclusion, herbicide resistance is a growing concern
and there is a pressing need for new modes of action. Previous 12. M. Koornneef and D. Meinke, Plant J., 2010, 61, 909.
1
3. H. Koga, A. Itoh, S. Murayama, S. Suzue and T. Irikura, J. Med.
Chem., 1980, 23, 1358.
4. M. N. Gandy, M. G. Corral, J. S. Mylne and K. A. Stubbs, Org.
Biomol. Chem., 2015, 13, 5586.
research has shown that DNA gyrase presents a potential new
target for herbicide development. We have demonstrated
here using a known chemical inhibitor scaffold of DNA gyrase,
1
fluoroquinolones, that tuning of molecules for selectivity 15. M. Corral, J. Leroux, K. A. Stubbs and J. S. Mylne, Sci. Rep., 2017,
towards a herbicidal rather than an antibiotic mode of action is
possible at the organism level. However, the gyra-3 mutant
highlights that, as for all herbicidal targets, resistance can be
selected for so practices that delay the evolution of resistance
7, 45871.
1
1
6. S. Funar-Timofei, A. Borota and L. Crisan, Mol Divers., 2017, 21,
4
37.
7. M. G. Corral, J. Leroux, S. Tresch, T. Newton, K. A. Stubbs and J.
S. Mylne, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 9881.
will also need to be considered. Overall this work presents a 18. K. Grohe and H. Heitzer, Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1987, 29.
2
1
platform for further research into this enzyme, both at the 19. S. Dhaneshwar, K. Tewari, S. Joshi, D. Godbole and P. Ghosh,
Chem. Phys. Lipids, 2011, 164, 307.
0. J. P. Hughes, S. Rees, S. B. Kalindjian and K. L. Philpott, Br. J.
Pharmacol., 2011, 162, 1239.
1. J. A. Evans, P. J. Tranel, A. G. Hager, B. Schutte, C. Wu, L. A.
Chatham and A. S. Davis, Pest. Manag. Sci, 2015, 72, 74.
chemical, biological and structural level, as a possible new
2
2
mode of action for herbicide development.
The authors wish to thank Melissa Andrade and Marina
Silich-Carrara for providing bacterial strains from the UWA
4
| J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins