C O MMU N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 2
in the presence of Me
SiCH
MgCl. The procedure is simple, and
3
2
the reaction tolerates a variety of functionalities because of the low
reactivity of Me SiCH MgCl. The mechanism of the cobalt-
3
2
catalyzed reaction is quite different from the palladium-catalyzed
one. The former proceeds via a radical pathway and would consist
of the following sequence: generation of an alkyl radical from an
alkyl halide by single-electron transfer from a cobalt complex, an
addition of the alkyl radical to styrene, formation of a benzylic
carbon-cobalt bond, and â-hydride elimination.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aids
for Scientific Research (Nos. 12305058 and 10208208) from the
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology,
Government of Japan. H.Y. and T.N. acknowledge JSPS for
financial support.
Scheme 3
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and
characterization data for new compounds (PDF). This material is
available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
(
1) (a) Mizoroki, T.; Mori, K.; Ozaki, A. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1971, 44,
5
81. (b) Heck, R. F.; Nolley, J. P., Jr. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 2320-
2322.
(
2) (a) Br a¨ se, S.; de Meijere, A. In Metal-catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions;
Diederich, F., Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1998; Chapter
3
. (b) Link, J. T.; Overman, L. E. In Metal-catalyzed Cross-Coupling
Reactions; Diederich, F., Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
1998; Chapter 6. (c) Heck, R. F. Org. React. 1982, 27, 345-390. (d)
Beletskaya, I. P.; Cheprakov, A. V. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 3009-3066.
3) (a) Hori, K.; Ando, M.; Takaishi, N.; Inamoto, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987,
(
2
8, 5883-5886. (b) Br a¨ se, S.; Waegell, B.; de Meijere, A. Synthesis 1998,
148-152.
(
4) Lebedev. S. A.; Lopatina, V. S.; Petrov, E. S.; Beletskaya, I. P. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1988, 344, 253-259.
The reaction with cyclopropylmethyl bromide provided a ring-
opening product, â-(3-butenyl)styrene (5), in 50% yield (Scheme
). In addition, tetrahydrofuran derivative 7 was obtained when iodo
acetal 6 was employed. Ring-opening of a cyclopropylmethyl
radical and ring-closure of a 5-hexenyl radical are well-known
processes.10 Generation of an alkyl radical from an alkyl halide is
consequently suggested. It is notable that bis-styrylation of 1,2-
dibromoethane proceeded, albeit the yield was low. A mechanism
via carbometalation of styrene is unlikely, because a 2-bromoeth-
ylmetal reagent undergoes rapid â-bromine elimination.
(
5) Branchaud, B. P.; Detlefsen, W. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 6273-
6
276.
2
(6) Terao, J.; Kambe, N. J. Synth. Org. Chem., Jpn. 2001, 59, 1044-1051.
(
7) Wakabayashi, K.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
23, 5374-5375.
(
1
8) dpph ) 1,6-bis(diphenylphosphino)hexane. The choice of the bidentate
ligand was crucial. When dppb, dppp, dppe, dppm, and triphenylphosphine
were employed, (2-cyclohexylethyl)benzene and its dimer 3 were obtained
significantly in addition to 2a.
On the basis of these observations, we propose a draft mechanism
for the catalytic reaction as shown in Scheme 3 in analogy with
(
9) Trialkylsilylmethyl Grignard reagents were essential to obtain the desired
product. The reaction of 1-bromododecane with styrene in the presence
of methyl or ethyl Grignard reagents provided a trace of â-laurylstyrene.
Dodecenes were obtained mainly instead.
7
the previous report. The reaction of CoCl
2
(dpph) with Me
3 2
SiCH -
MgCl gives complex 8, which is electron-rich due to coordination
of the Grignard reagent.11 Complex 8 effects single-electron transfer
to an alkyl halide to yield an anion radical of the halide and cobalt
complex 9. Immediate loss of halide from the anion radical affords
an alkyl radical intermediate, which adds to styrene to yield a
benzylic radical. Cobalt species 9 would then recombine with the
carbon-centered radical to form cobalt species 10. Finally, â-hydride
elimination provides the product and complex 11, which affords 8
(10) (a) Newcomb, M. In Radicals in Organic Synthesis; Renaud, P., Sibi,
M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001; Vol. 1, Chapter 3.1. (b)
Newcomb, M.; Choi, S. Y.; Horner, J. H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1225-
1
231. (c) Beckwith, A. L. J.; Glover, S. A. Aust. J. Chem. 1987, 40, 157-
1
73.
(
3 2
11) The abbreviation Ln in Scheme 3 represents Me SiCH groups, and the
X represents valence of cobalt. The active cobalt species is unclear at
this stage. A preliminary result can help understanding a mechanistic
aspect: treatment of CoCl
mmol) afforded a trace of Me
that (Me SiCH Co species is stable and that reductive elimination
2
(dpph) (1.0 mmol) with Me
3 2
SiCH MgCl (2.0
3
SiCH CH SiMe . This experiment suggests
2
2
3
by the action of remaining Me
In summary, CoCl (dpph) efficiently catalyzes a Heck-type
reaction of alkyl halides, including alkyl chlorides, with styrenes
3
2
SiCH MgCl.
3
2 2
)
providing a low-valent cobalt complex did not take place.
2
JA026296L
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 124, NO. 23, 2002 6515