G Model
CCLET-3142; No. of Pages 5
2
W.-B. Chen et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
transduction mediated by inositol phosphates and phosphatidy-
linositol phosphates potentiated the effects of various cancer cell
lines, which suggested that they could be employed in combina-
tion drug therapy [33–35]. There are also other examples [36–39]
that phosphonates replaced phosphates in the drug development.
We previously reported a kind of inositol phosphonate analogues
using myo-inositol as the starting material, and found that two
phosphonate analogues exhibited relatively good cytotoxicity
against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line A549 [40].
Therefore, phosphonate moiety instead of the phosphate ester
group is a good alternative to resistant to enzymatic degradation
and has already achieved great success in the development of
antivirus drugs [39]. In continuation of our research program on
pursuing novel biologically active compounds in the fields of
human health, especially anticancer agents, we reported herein the
design and synthesis of a series of inositol phosphonate analogues
starting material was consumed completely. Then the mixture was
concentrated and the residue was separated by chromatography
on silica gel (PE/EA = 3:1–1:1) to give compound 5 as an oil.
2.3. Bioassay
NSCLC cell line A549 was obtained from ATCC (American type
2
culture collection) and were maintained in 5% CO at 37 8C. A549
cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM,
Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Omega
Scientific) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Omega Scientific).
Approximately 1000 cells were seeded into individual wells of
96-well tissue culture plates and incubated for 12 h, medium was
0.2 mL/well. The compound was diluted to 10
mg/mL using DMEM
(final concentration in the well), to analyze the inhibition effect on
A549 roughly. The positive inhibitors were dissolved in DMSO
reaching a final DMSO concentration of 0.5%. Viability was
normalized to control cells which were treated with the vehicle,
with the general structure ‘‘inositol–O–CH
CH CH –P’’ along with the initial antitumor activity evaluation
results.
2
–P’’ or ‘‘inositol–O–
2
2
DMSO. After 72 h incubation at 37 8C and 5% CO
assessed by MTT assay. Cells were replenished with fresh medium
0.1 mL/well) which contains 10% MTT. Culture medium was
removed after 4 h, and the formazan was dissolved in DMSO
200 L/well). Then OD570 were measured by Plate Reader
2
, cell viability was
(
2
. Experimental
Solvents were obtained from commercial sources and purified
(
m
(BIORAD).
according to the literature [41] if necessary. Nuclear magnetic
resonance spectra were recorded on Bruker AV 300 or 400 NMR
instrument in CDCl
3
. Chemical shifts (
d
) are reported in parts per
3. Results and discussion
million (ppm), relative to TMS as internal standard. High resolution
mass spectra (HR-MS) were carried out on IonSpec FTICR-MS
instrument from Varian using ESI as ionization mode. Flash-
column chromatography was performed using commercial grades
of silica gel 200–300 meshes. Analytical thin layer chromatography
In our previous work, we found mono-phosphate inositol
compounds had low anticancer activity (see Table 1) against non-
small cell lung cancer cell. We thus postulated that the instability
of the phosphates to most enzymes in the cell may compromise
their activities. Based on this hypothesis, we designed and
synthesized the phosphonate inositol derivatives as alternatives
of phosphate inositol compounds by introducing the known
(TLC) was performed on pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 plates, and
spot visualization was accomplished by UV light (254 nm) or
phosphomolybdic acid solution.
2 2 2
structural features such as P–CH –O and P–CH CH –O fragments
2
.1. General procedure for synthesis of methylenephosphonate
at the different positions of the inositol ring. In fact, the use of
phosphonates or phosphonic acids as analogues of natural
phosphates represents a more systematic approach to metabolic
regulation and enhancement or inhibition, than is commonly
attributed to ‘‘analogue’’ study [39]. The synthetic strategies of
these novel phosphonate inositol derivatives were depicted in
Scheme 1. A nucleophilic substitution of trifluoromethanesulfo-
nate-activated phosphonates with the protected inositols afforded
inositol compounds 3aa–3ad and 3ba–3bd
To
0.25 mmol) in dry THF (5 mL) at À60 8C under N
butyllithium (2.5 mol/L in THF, 0.3 mmol) by syringe. After string
0 min, the resulting mixture was added to (dialkoxyphosphinyl)
a
stirred solution of mono-hydroxy inositol 2a–d
(
2
was added n-
3
methyl triflate 1a or 1b (0.325 mmol) in 1 mL of dry THF by
syringe. Then the reactant was allowed to warm up to 0 8C over a
period of 1 h and stirred for 1 h at 0 8C. After the completion of
starting material by thin layer chromatography, the reactant was
compounds 3 containing P–CH
rearrangement of triethylphosphite with bromoethylinositols
furnished compounds 5 with P–CH CH –O fragment.
2
–O fragment, whereas an Arbuzov
2
2
quenched by saturated NH
with DCM (15 mL Â 4), dried over Na
DCM, the residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel
PE/EA = 2:1–1:1) to give compound 3 as an oil.
4
Cl aqueous (5 mL), and extracted
The starting (dialkyloxyphosphinyl)methyltriflate 1a and 1b
were prepared according to the reported procedures in three steps
2
SO . After concentration of
4
3
from PCl [42–44]. Reaction of paraformaldehyde with diethylpho-
(
sphite or dibenzylphosphite gave the dialkyl (hydroxymethyl)pho-
sphonate, which was converted to triflate 1a, 1b using 2,6-lutidine
as the base in total yield of 38% and 30%, respectively (Scheme 2).
2.2. General procedure for synthesis of ethylenephosphonate inositol
compounds 5a–d
Mono-hydroxyl inositol compounds 2 were obtained by
selective protection or ring-opening from commercially available
myo-inositol in two to three steps with desired yields [23].
Bromoethyl inositol compounds 4a–d were generated from the
A mixture of bromoethyl inositol 4a–d (0.03 mmol)and triethyl
phosphite (3 mL) was heated to 140 8C for 10 h, TLC showed the
Table 1
The inhibition rate against A549 (10 mg/mL).
Compd.
Inhibition rate (%)
Compd.
Inhibition rate (%)
Compd.
Inhibition rate (%)
Compd.
Inhibition rate (%)
Compd.
Inhibition rate (%)
3
3
3
3
aa
ab
ac
ad
<15
3ba
<15
5a
5b
5c
5d
<15
6a
6b
6c
6d
19.5Æ 4.2
26.1Æ 2.1
30.4 Æ 2.3
24.1Æ 4.6
7a
7b
7c
7d
35.6 Æ 4.4
57.7 Æ 0.9
23.1 Æ 1.3
20.8 Æ 9.0
<15
3bb
59.3 Æ 3.0
39.8 Æ 5.9
32.6 Æ 11.7
61.5 Æ 2.6
19.1 Æ 4.5
43.9 Æ 6.0
16.2 Æ 12.0
49.0 Æ 6.6
<15
3bc
3bd
DMSO
0.0 Æ 1.9
Cisplatin