Chemistry Letters 2000
587
3/PEO350 show large difference depending on the solvents, as
shown in Figure1. From the UV-Vis absorption spectrum in
chloroform (Figure 1a), we can find two absorption bands
peaked around 316 nm and 361 nm, respectively. In water the
absorption maximum is at about 300 nm (Figure 1b). In cyclo-
hexane, the absorption band peaked at about 361 nm (Figure 1c).
For OPV-3/PEO750, it shows minor substituent effect on
absorbance and almost similar spectroscopic behaviors.
The microphase separation behaviors of the copolymers
were studied by using transmission electron micrograph (TEM).
For TEM studies, thin films were prepared by casting the cyclo-
hexane solution (1 × 10-5 M) on carbon-coated copper grid and
evaporating in a solvent atmosphere, then exposing it to vacu-
um for about one day and not staining. As shown in Figure 3,
the micrograph of OPV-3/PEO750 clearly shows aggregate
domains that are approximate 3-4 nm in diameter. It is also
found that the morphology is dependent on coil fraction. For
OPV-3/PEO350, it can form stripes on the scale of nanometer
and the length can extend to several tens of nanometers. These
patterned materials based on nanophase separation are antici-
pated leading to novel photophysical and electronic properties
and further research is underway.
To identify these absorption bands which originate from dif-
ferent aggregate states, we examine temperature dependent UV-
Vis absorption and host-guest complexes of OPV-3/PEO350 with
β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) in aqueous solution. It is believed that β-
CD can only form 1:1 inclusion complex with oligo(phenylene
vinylene).7 OPV-3/PEO350 and β-CD (mole ratio 1:200) were
dissolved in water and stirred for two weeks, however, the absorp-
tion spectrum was not found any change. The peak positions of
spectra remained almost the same even to relatively low concen-
tration or upon heating, which suggests that this species may be
pretty stable. To adjust the polarity of the solvent, ethanol was
added. By increasing the solution temperature from 23 oC to 84
oC, we found that the absorption band peaking around 300 nm
decreased, meanwhile a absorption band at about 361 nm
appeared and its intensity increased gradually, as shown in Figure
2. This suggests that absorption around 361 nm should originate
from monomers. An isosbectic point was also found from the
temperature dependent absorption spectra. It indicated a direct
conversion of these two species. Furthermore, when we added the
β-CD to the mixed solution (water : ethanol 3:1), stirred overnight
and precipitated β-CD from the solution by chloroform, washed
the precipitates several times, dried it under vacuum, then dis-
solved the β-CD into water again, we found that besides the
absorption at 300 nm, there still existed an absorption band
peaked around 361 nm. It was greatly different from that in pure
water without β-CD since the aggregates are stable and can’t exist
as monomers in it. This can also support the conclusion that the
absorption at about 361 nm originates from monomers. In this
case it formed 1:1 inclusion complex with β-CD. In water, the
absorption peaking around 300nm which is much blue-shifted
compared to that of monomers is indicative of formation of H-
aggregates. It is very similar to those obtained for LB films.8 In
cyclohexane, the rod-coil compound absorbing at about 361 nm
exists majorly as monomers. In chloroform, the absorption is
blue-shifted to 316 nm compared to that of monomers, suggesting
formation of a type of H-aggregate.
The authors give the thanks to National Natural Science
Foundation of China for the financial support.
References and Notes
1
a) A. Haperin, Macromolecules, 23, 2724 (1990). b) D. R. M.
Williams and G. H. Fredrickson, Macromolecules, 25, 3561 (1992).
c) L. H. Radzilowski and S. I. Stupp, Macromoleules, 27, 7747
(1994). d) S. A. Jenekhe and X. L. Chen, Science, 279, 1903 (1998).
e) M. Lee, B. K. Cho, H. Kim, J. Y. Yoon, and W. C. Zin, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 120. 9168 (1998). f) J. T. Chen, E. L. Thomas, C. K.
Ober, and G. –p. Mao, Science, 273, 343 (1996). g) W. J. Li, H. B.
Wang, L. P. Yu, T. L. Morkved, and H. M. Jaeger, Macromolecules,
32, 3034 (1999).
2
3
a) J. H. Burroughes, D. D. C. Bradley, A. R. Brown, R. N. Marks, K.
Mackay, R. H. Friend, P. L. Burn, and A. B.Holmes, Nature, 347,
539 (1990). b) D. Braun and A. J. Heeger, Appl. Phys. Lett., 58, 1982
(1991).
J. Cornil, D. A. dos Santos, X. Crispin, R. Silbey, and J. L. Brédas, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 1289 (1998).
4
5
K. Müllen and G. Wegner, Adv. Mater., 10, 433 (1998).
R. Schenk, H. Gregorius, K. Meerholz, J. Heinze, and K. Müllen, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 113, 2634 (1991).
6
Selected data OPV-3/PEO350: Mw/Mn = 1.10; (1H NMR 400 MHz,
CDCl3): ɬ3.379 (s,3H), 3.5-3.8 (24H), 3.871 (t,2H,J=4.4 Hz), 4.146
(t, 2H, J = 4.4 Hz), 6.916 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 6.952-7.114 (4H),
7.257 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.364 (t, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.448 (d, 2H, J =
8.8 Hz), 7.490 (s, 4H), 7.523 (d, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz); IR(KBr cm-1): CH2
2871, 2924, C-O-C 1113, 1063, C-O-Ar 1251, trans –CH=CH- 968,
3022; OPV-3/PEO750: Mw/Mn = 1.09; ɬ3.379 (s, 3H) 3.5-3.8
(60H), 3.872 (t, 2H, J = 4.8 Hz), 4.158 (t, 2H, J = 4.8 Hz), 6.917 (d,
2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 6.953-7.115 (4H), 7.259 (t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.364
(t, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.449 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz) 7.491 (s, 4H), 7.524 (d,
2H, J = 7.2 Hz); IR(KBr cm-1): CH2 2870, 2924, C-O-C 1113, 1062,
C-O-Ar 1253, trans –CH=CH- 968, 3024.
7
8
X. D. Song, C. Geiger, M. Farahat, J. Perlstein, and D. G. Whitten, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 119, 12481 (1997).
a) A. Watakabe, H. Okada, and T. Kunitake, Langmuir, 10, 2722
(1994). b) Results unpublished.