A. Krief, A. Kremer / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 4306–4309
4309
Thus vinyl cyclopropane carboxylic acids 1 are obtained from
compounds 3aC0 l, 3aB0 r, 3bB0 r, 3aC00l which possess an axial methyl
group (R2 = Me) at C-5 and a leaving group at C-4 with similar or
better leaving group aptitude than at C-3 (see Scheme 4, entry a;
Table 1, entries 1–3 and 6; Condition A). The higher percentage
of cyclopropane derivative 1 from compounds 3a0Cl, 3aB0 r, 3aC00l bear-
ing a gem-dimethyl groups at C-5 over 3b0Br missing it may be ratio-
nalized by involving the Thorpe-Ingold effect (Table 1 compare
entry 3 to entries 1 and 2; Condition A).11
(0.5 h). Using dried KOH, the bicyclo [3.1.0] beta-bromo cyclo-
pentanone 2aBr (70%) and the vinyl lactone 4a (30%) are formed
whereas using KOH generated from potassium hydride, the bicyclo
[3.1.0] beta-bromo cyclopentanone 2aBr (19%) and cis-chrysanthe-
mic acid 1a (81%) are instead produced.
Dried KOH in THF behaves as KOH in aq DMSO (Condition C).
KOH from KH behaves as ‘AHP’ in chemoselectivity but not in reac-
tivity. ‘AHP’ therefore possesses an exceptional reactivity which
differentiates it from the two ‘anhydrous potassium hydroxide’
and wet potassium hydroxide reagents tested in this study.
The results reported are far beyond the scope of the multistep
one-pot transformation we have finally successfully achieved using
‘APH’. They suggest that potassium t-butoxide and t-butanol which
are also present in ‘APH’ play a crucial role in its reactivity. They
also extend the scope of action of this exceptional reagent far be-
yond what has been already published.3e
It is interesting to note that the vinyl lactones 4 are mainly pro-
duced from (i) 3c0Br and 3dB0 r which miss the axial methyl group
even if the leaving groups at C-3 and C-4 are the same (Table 1, en-
00
tries 4 and 5; Condition A) or (ii) 3a or 3a0I0 which possess an axial
Br
methyl group at C-5 but bear a better leaving group at C-3 than at
C-4 (Table 1, entries 7 and 8; Condition A).
In order to promote the one-pot synthesis of vinyl cyclopropane
carboxylic acids 1 from the cyclohexanones 3 that we were unable
to achieve using potassium hydroxide under condition A, we
decided to use ‘anhydrous potassium hydroxide’ (‘APH’) instead.2,3
‘APH’ is a 2/1 mixture of potassium t-butoxide and potassium
hydroxide and we expected that the former reagent would act as
a powerful base12 to generate the cyclopropane ring whereas the
naked hydroxide anion would achieve, in a second step, the frag-
mentation reaction producing after acidic treatment the vinyl
cyclopropane carboxylic acid 1. This was quite risky since, except
in one case,13 ‘APH’ has been used as a powerful nucleophile.2,3 It
has been successfully used to transform, in high yields and under
mild conditions (ether, 20 °C, few hours), even sterically hindered
esters,3 tertiary amides,3b and non-enolizable ketones1b,2,3 to the
corresponding potassium carboxylates and potassium alcoholates,
-amides or -carbanions, respectively (Scheme 1), without epimer-
General procedure for the ‘one-pot’ cyclization–fragmentation
reactions
With ‘AHP’ in THF: water (21 mg, 1.15 mmol) is added at 20 °C to
a solution of freshly sublimed potassium tert-butoxide (426 mg,
3.8 mmol) in dry THF (4 mL) and the reaction mixture is stirred
for 0.25 h at that temperature. A solution of 3-bromo-4-mesyl-
00
oxy-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-cyclohexanone 2a (164 mg, 0.5 mmol)
Br
in dry THF (2 mL) is then added dropwise at 20 °C. The reaction
is monitored by TLC (pentane/diethyl ether 80:20) and the reaction
is quenched by icy water (5 mL) after 0.6 h. Aqueous HCl (10%) is
then added (until pH 2) and the solution is extracted with ether
(4 ꢀ 10 mL). The combined organic extracts are washed with water
(2 ꢀ 3 mL), dried over MgSO4, filtered and evaporated under re-
duced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chro-
matography using pentane/diethyl ether (60:40) as eluent to
furnish 75 mg (89%) of 1a.
izing their a-carbon.
The reaction of ‘APH’ on 3 is best achieved in THF using a reac-
tant/reagent ratio (3/t-BuOK/H2O: 1/7.6/2.3) in which it delivers in
very high yield the cis-vinyl cyclopropane carboxylic acids 1 at
20 °C (Table 1, Condition B). The reaction proved to be stereospe-
cific delivering a different stereoisomer of desmethyl cis-chrysan-
themic acids 1b and 1c from each stereoisomers of 3,4-dibromo-
2,2,5-trimethylcyclohexanones 3b0Br and 3cB0 r used (Table 1, entries
3 and 4; Condition B).
References and notes
1. (a) Krief, A.; Lorvelec, G.; Jeanmart, S. Tetrahedron. Lett. 2000, 41, 3871–3874;
(b) Krief, A.; Kremer, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 3045–3049.
2. Krief, A.; Kremer, A. Synlett 2007, 607–610.
3. (a) Swan, G. A. J. Chem. Soc. 1948, 1408–1412; (b) Gassman, P. G.; Zalar, F. V.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1964, 5, 3031–3034; (c) Gassman, P. G.; Zalar, F. V.; Lumb, J. T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 946–952; (d) Mehta, G.; Venkateswaran, R. V.
Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 1399–1422; (e) Krief, A.; Kremer, A. Chem. Rev., in press.
4. (a) Prepared by (i) non-regioselective ring opening of 3,4-oxido-2,2,5,5-
tetramethyl cyclohexanone with titanium tetrachloride, tetrabromide or
trimethylsilyliodide, (ii) acid hydrolysis, (iii) mesylation and (iv) separation
of the diastereoisomeric mixture of b-halogenomesylates.
5. (a) Krief, A.; Jeanmart, S.; Kremer, A. Heterocycles 2008, 76, 1075–1079;
(b) Krief, A.; Jeanmart, S.; Kremer, A. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 9795–
9797.
6. (a) Corey, E. J.; Sneen, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 6269–6278; (b) Behnam,
S. M.; Behnam, S. E.; Ando, K.; Green, N. S.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
8970–8978.
7. (a) Krief, A.; Hobe, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6529–6532; (b) Krief, A.; Hobe,
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6527–6528.
8. Bürgi, H. B.; Dunitz, J. D.; Lehn, J.-M.; Wipff, G. Tetrahedron 1974, 30, 1563–
1572.
9. (a) Wharton, P. S.; Hiegel, G. A. J. Org. Chem. 1965, 30, 3254–3257; (b) Zurflüh,
R.; Wall, E. N.; Sidall, J. B.; Edwards, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 6224–6225;
(c) Heathcock, C. H.; Badger, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 234–238.
10. (a) Grob, C. A.; Schiess, P. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1967, 6, 1–15; (b) Grob,
C. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8, 535–546.
Performing the reaction in DMSO does not offer advantages, it is
often slower and produces diastereoisomeric mixtures of cis- and
00
trans-chrysanthemic acid 1a from 3-bromo- 3a and 3-iodo- 3aI00
Br
4-mesyloxy-2,2,5,5-tetrametylcyclohexanones (Table 1, Condition
00
C, cis-1a/trans-1a: 83/17 from 3a and 30/70 from 3a0I0”, compare
Br
to Conditions A and B).
We have been unable to find the origin of the trans-chrysanthe-
mic acid 1a formed in this process. We have however secured, by
independent reactions, that ‘AHP’ in DMSO (Condition C) is unable
to (i) epimerize potassium cis- to trans-chrysanthemate or (ii) to
transform the lactone 4a to 1a. Another hypothesis which involves
a completely different mechanism is presented in Scheme 5. It im-
plies the metalation of the intermediate Fa00 (resulting from the at-
tack of ‘APH’ on the carbonyl group of 3a00) followed by cyclization
through Ga00.
In order to have a better insight in the real species required for
successful synthesis of chrysanthemic acid 1 we have carried out
00
the reaction of 3-bromo-4-mesyloxy-cyclohexanone 3a with
Br
11. Moore, B. R.; Ingold, C. K.; Thorpe, J. F. J. Chem. Soc., Trans. 1915, 107, 1080–
1106.
potassium hydroxide generated by (i) dehydration, on heating, of
powdered commercial potassium hydroxide or (ii) on reacting stoi-
chiometric amounts of water on potassium hydride (1 equiv KH,
1 equiv H2O, THF, 20 °C).3,14 Those reagents miss potassium t-
butoxide as well as t-butanol.
12. As LDA did.1,5 In those cases however competition with an hydroxide ion
playing the role of nucleophile was missing. t-BuOK would act as a strong base
favoring the attack of Ha (Scheme 3) and will not act as a nucleophile toward
the carbonyl group of 3.
13. Markó, I. E.; Vanherck, J.-C.; Ates, A.; Tinant, B.; Declercq, J.-P. Tetrahedron Lett.
2003, 44, 3333–3336.
14. Erman, W. F.; Wenkert, E.; Jeffs, P. W. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 2196–2203.
We found that both reactions carried out in THF at 20 °C are
slower (18 h and 66 h, respectively) than those involving ‘APH’