Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
mixture to favor nBuLi addition to 1a over its competing
hydrolysis is illustrated in entries 7 and 8 of Table 1, whereas
using neat H2O or Gly, in the absence of ammonium salt
ChCl, furnishes 2a in lower 22 and 38% yields, respectively.
Highlighting the exciting potential of these green solvents,
when the addition order of the reagents is reversed and nBuLi
is introduced firstly to the eutectic mixture, which is stirred for
15 s under air before adding imine 1a, product 2a is obtained
in a remarkably high 89% yield. Astonishingly, even if a one-
minute interval is left between these reagents, the yield of 2a
is still good at 63%, emphasising the kinetic stability of nBuLi
in this green solvent. Indeed, it is only after 3.5 min when the
formation of 2a is almost totally suppressed (Scheme 1).
Table 1: Study of the addition reaction of organometallic reagents (RM)
to N-benzylideneaniline (1a) in different DESs.[a,b]
Entry
RM[b]
[mmol][b]
Solvent
Yield [%][c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
nBuLi
1.3
1.4
1.8
2
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1ChCl/2Gly
1ChCl/2Gly
1ChCl/2Gly
1ChCl/2Gly
1ChCl/2EG
1ChCl/2H2O
H2O
91
95
97
98
66
54
22
38
1
nBuLi
nBuLi
nBuLi
nBuLi
nBuLi
nBuLi
nBuLi
Gly
9
nBuMgCl
nBuMgCl
nBu2Mg
LiMgnBu3
1ChCl/2Gly
1ChCl/2Gly
1ChCl/2Gly
1ChCl/2Gly
10[d]
11
12
8
36
72
[a] Reactions were performed under air, at room temperature and using
1 g of DES. Reaction time 3 s. 1 mmol of the imine 1a was always used.
[b] Commercial solutions of nBuLi (1.6m in hexanes), nBuMgCl (1.0m in
THF) or dibutylmagnesium (1.0m in hexanes) were used. LiMgnBu3 was
prepared in situ by mixing equimolar amounts of nBuLi and nBu2Mg in
hexane. [c] Determined via 1H NMR data using dibromomethane as
internal standard. [d] ZnCl2 (10 mol%) was added to the reaction
mixture.
Scheme 1. Assessing the time-dependent formation of 2a when the
order of addition of reagents is reversed.
The reactivity of 1a with other polar organometallics
under the optimized reaction conditions was also investi-
n
gated. BuMgCl failed to produce 2a, even when ZnCl2 was
n
employed as an additive (entries 9 and 10). Using Bu2Mg,
mixture 1ChCl/2Gly (1:2 mol/mol). Remarkably, under
conditions incompatible with conventional organolithium
chemistry, almost quantitative formation of amine (2a) was
observed employing only slight excess of nBuLi (1.4 equiv,
entry 2), in a very short reaction time (2–3 s). Advantages of
this approach are that: 1) no additives are required to achieve
high conversions; 2) competitive enolization, reduction or
coupling reactions were not observed;[12] 3) edging closer to
which has recently shown promise for addition to bis-
(aryl)methylimines in toluene,[16] yields 2a in a modest 36%
yield (entry 11). Even anionically activated lithium magnesi-
ate LiMgnBu3 showed reduced reactivity (72%, entry 12),
suggesting that under these conditions, the high polarity of
À
Li C bonds in RLi reagents is crucial for success of the 1,2-
addition process.
Our previous work related the enhanced reactivity of
polar organometallics in DESs with studies on the addition of
RMgX reagents to ketones in organic solvents, where chemo-
selectivity can be enhanced by adding substoichiometric
amounts of ammonium salt NnBu4Cl.[8] We attributed this to
forming kinetically activated mixed ammonium magnesiate
salts. Studies here reacting PhLi with 1a in THF in the
presence of NnBu4Cl suggest the formation of related mixed
ammonium lithiate species. However, in this case, these
compounds appear to be extremely reactive in THF solutions,
having a negative effect on addition chemoselectivity. Thus
NMR monitoring of the reaction revealed the formation of
lithium but-3-en-1 oxide 4, resulting from a-deprotonation
and subsequent ring-opening of THF (50% yield) along with
ammonium lithiate complex 5 (Scheme 2(i)), whose consti-
n
stoichiometric conditions, a slight excess of BuLi gave full
conversion to the desired amine 2a, even though hydrolysis
could be expected in the protic solvent; and 4) no imine
decomposition was seen in the eutectic mixture.
Next we assessed the effect of different ChCl-based DESs
on this 1,2-addition reaction. Interestingly, replacing Gly for
HBDs ethylene glycol (EG, entry 5) and water (entry 6)
lowers the yield of amine 2a (to 66 and 54%, respectively).
Notwithstanding, although the addition process is less effi-
cient, its excellent chemoselectivity is maintained, without
forming by-products, as only unreacted imine 1a and amine
2a were seen in the reaction crudes (see the Supporting
Information (SI)).[13] Contrastingly, when using HBDs con-
taining carbonyl functionalities (such as urea or lactic acid),
1
complex mixtures of products were observed from adding
tution was established by H DOSY NMR experiments (see
n
=
BuLi across the C O bond of these H-donor molecules,
SI). Contrastingly, using PhLi the addition reaction occurs
quantitatively to form amide [(THF)3LiNPh(CHPh2)] (3),
whose structure was elucidated by X-ray crystallography
(Scheme 2(ii) and SI). This significant increase in the basicity
of PhLi in THF on the addition of NnBu4Cl contrasts with
results observed using DESs, where no substantial metallation
of the glycerol (HBD component of the DES) is seen, hinting
along with traces of 2a.[14] Crucially, the use of inert-
atmosphere Schlenk techniques or low temperature (0 to
À788C), mandatory when these additions are carried out in
ethereal solvents, are not required using DESs (these solvent
mixtures have a high heat capacity, so low temperatures are
not needed to cool reactions).[15] The propensity of the DES
2
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!