Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
this synthetic obstacle, yet there was not any improvement to
suppress the ortho-ester formation. To overcome this obstacle,
p-methoxybenzyl (PMB) was used as in compound 5.2.
Without the neighboring group participation, the β-1,2-trans-
O-glycosylation was achieved with assistance of the solvent
effect. After screening of several glycosylation conditions, the
galactosylated hydroxylysine 6.2 was obtained in 42% yield
with only the β-glycoside formed. This promising result not
only allowed for the next step synthesis but also demon-
strated the feasibility of stereoselective glycosylation of the
ε-amine Boc protected 5-hydroxylysine. To continue the
second glycosylation, we attempted the PMB deprotection of
6.2 to afford compound 7. Unfortunately, the PMB deprotection
reaction was messy. Likely, the MBn group might be sensitive
to oxidants and incompatible with PMB groups (Scheme 3).
With this failure, we turned to the convergent approach
(route 2) (Scheme 3). The challenge of this route lies in the
final β-1,2-trans-glycosylation between the disaccharide and
the hydroxylsine building block, considering its steric hindrance
and lack of β-selectivity driving factor plagued with a glycoside
at the C-2 position. To this end, the 5.1 underwent a hydrolysis
to generate a 2-OH free product 5.1a in quantitative yield,
which was subjected as the glycosyl acceptor to react with
thioglycoside 8 for disaccharide moiety construction. The key
point was how to selectively introduce an α-1,2-cis glucosyl
bond. Fortunately, when the DMF/DCM solvent system31
and PhSCl/AgOTf initiator32 were employed, the desired
disaccharide thioglycoside with α-O-glycosyl linkage could be
obtained in good yield with exclusive α-stereoselectivity. Subse-
quently, the disaccharide thioglycoside moiety 9 was successfully
glycosylated with the HLBB 4 under AgOTf/PhSCl/TTBP
conditions, and the usage of DCM/CH3CH2CN solvent system
was the key to induce exclusive β-1,2-trans-glycosylation affording
the desired product 10. Next, a Fmoc-compatible ester hydrolysis
protocol (LiOH, CaCl2)33 was employed to afford the building
block 11. This is a convenient and scalable synthetic route,
which permitted the synthesis of MBn protected α-D-glucopyr-
anosyl-(1−2)-β-galactopyranosyl (2S,5R)-hydroxylysine building
block for the glycopeptide fragment preparation (Scheme 3).
Synthesis of Glycosylated Adiponectin Collagenous
Domain (glyACD). With all the building blocks in hand, we
continued with the total synthesis of glyACD. The attempt
with direct SPPS failed to generate any desired product.
After several trials, we finalized the synthesis via ligating two
peptide fragments via Ser/Thr ligation (Figure 2).34−37 The
47-amino acid-glycopeptide hAdn-WM77-b was prepared
using SPPS, followed by TMSOTf treatment to remove the
MBn groups present on the glycans, affording hAdn-WM77-b
after HPLC isolation (8.9% yield based on the resin loading).
It is worth noting that the replacement of Bn protecting groups
of the disaccharide to MBn protecting groups was critical, as
all MBn groups could be cleanly removed without cleaving
the glycosidic linkage. The resultant glycopeptide underwent
deFmoc conditions, which then was, without HPLC purification,
directly ligated with peptide salicylaldehyde ester hAdn-WM-a
under Ser/Thr ligation conditions in 30.8% yield over two steps
after HPLC isolation. With the same strategy, the syntheses
of glyACD with all possible glycoforms (15 in total) have
been successfully completed (Scheme 4).
Table 1. Comparison of the Emax and EC50 for the
Antiproliferative Activity of glyACD in Human Breast
Cancer MDA-MB-231 Cells
a
After 24 h of incubation, the cell number was manually counted to
b
calculate the maximum inhibition rate (Emax). Half-maximal effective
concentration. This peptide contains a tiny amount of small
c
molecular weight impurity. hAdn: human adiponectin.
for details of the assay). After 24 h of incubation, the cell
number was manually counted to calculate the maximum inhi-
bition rate (Emax) and the half-maximal effective concentra-
tion (EC50) (Table 1). When compared to those of full-length
human adiponectin, hAdn-WM exhibited a significantly reduced
Emax (by ∼3-fold) and a much higher EC50 (by ∼19-fold).
The Emax of glyACD ranged from ∼26.0% to ∼53%, which
was lower than that of full-length adiponectin but higher than
hAdn-WM. Among all glyACD, hAdn-WM656877101 with
tetraglycans exhibited the lowest EC50 (Table 1).
The glyACD with mono-, di-, and triglycans exhibited lower
Emax than that of hAdn-WM656877101, which contained
tetraglycans (Figure 3A). There were no significant differences
between the EC50 of glyACD containing mono-, di-, and
triglycans, all significantly higher than that of hAdn-
WM656877101 (Figure 3B). In the presence of 20 μg/mL
hAdn-WM, the Emax of human adiponectin was significantly
decreased (66.7
4.29% vs 54.2
2.95%%, P < 0.05). By
contrast, hAdn-WM656877101 did not inhibit the Emax of
human adiponectin (Figure 3C). In the chessboard assay,
co-incubation with 5, 10, or 20 μg/mL of hAdn-WM reduced
the antiproliferative activity of adiponectin at a concentration
from 0.74 to 2.5 μg/mL (Figure 3D), indicating antagonistic
effects (combination index of >1). By contrast, co-incubation
with 2.5, 5, 10, or 20 μg/mL of hAdn-WM656877101 enhanced
the antiproliferative activity of adiponectin at a concentration
lower than 2.5 μg/mL (Figure 3D), suggesting that the
combination generated synergistic effects (combination index
of <1). The chessboard competition assay was performed to
Antiproliferative Activity of the glyACD. The human
breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells were used to evaluate the
antiproliferative activities of adiponectin, the 15 glyACD, and
7812
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 7808−7818