for their direct conversion to stereodefined (E)-ꢀ-aryl vinyl
halides is of great significance.
On the other hand, it was found that electrophilic bromi-
nation (or iodination)18 of substituted styrylsilanes proceeded
stereoselectively with molecular halogens7,19 or N-halosuc-
cinimides20 to give the corresponding styryl halides with
retention of configuration.
We have envisaged that the ruthenium-catalyzed (E)-
selective silylative coupling of styrenes with trimethylvinyl-
silane followed by N-halosuccinimide-mediated halodesily-
lation can be a valuable synthetic method for one-pot
conversion of styrenes into (E)-ꢀ-aryl vinyl halides (Scheme
1). Therefore, in this paper, we report a facile one-pot
However, the stereoselective, direct transformations of
terminal alkenes into (E)-vinyl halides are strongly limited,
and to the best of our knowledge, there is no precedent for
the one-pot (E)-selective iodination of terminal alkenes.
Grubbs and co-workers reported a two-step synthesis of (Z)-
vinyl bromides and (E)-vinyl iodides from alkenes via their
sequential cross-metathesis with vinyl- or 1-propenyl bor-
onates followed by halogenation of the resulting alkenylbo-
ronate intermediates.11 However, iodination, in contrast to
bromination, cannot be carried out in one pot with a cross-
metathesis reaction. Very recently, the first example of cross-
metathesis of 4-methoxystyrene with (E)-1,2-dichloroethene
to yield (Z)-4-methoxystyryl chloride as predominant product
has been reported.12 (E)-Vinyl iodides can be also formed
by the two-step oxidative cleavage of the terminal olefins
with ozone or OsO4/NaIO4 followed by a Takai iodoolefi-
nation.13
Scheme 1. Proposed Synthesis of (E)-ꢀ-Aryl Vinyl Halides
The silylative coupling of olefins with vinyl-substituted
organosilicon compounds, which we have developed in the
last two decades as a new effective catalytic activation of
the C-H bond of olefins and C-Si bond of organosilicon
compounds (generally occurring in the presence of complexes
containing initially or generating in situ M-H and M-Si
bonds), appears to be a valuable synthetic tool in the
preparation of vinyl-substituted organosilicon reagents and
polymers.14 Recently, the ruthenium-catalyzed silylative
coupling reaction followed by Hiyama coupling has been
also successfully applied to the stereoselective synthesis of
organic products such as (E)-stilbenes15a and (E)-N-
styrylcarbazoles.15b,c
preparation of (E)-ꢀ-aryl vinyl iodides and (E)-ꢀ-aryl vinyl
bromides from styrenes via the corresponding (E)-styrylsilane
intermediates.
Initially, we focused on the synthesis of (E)-aryl vinyl
iodides, as they generally display higher activity in cross-
coupling reactions.
The reaction conditions were optimized with use of styrene
and trimethylvinylsilane as substrates. For preliminary results
on the silylative coupling reaction, equimolar amounts of
the comercially available styrene and trimethylvinylsilane
were used, and the reaction was conducted following the
original procedure (RuHCl(CO)(PPh3)3 catalyst (1 mol %)
toluene, 6 h, 100 °C, sealed ampule)16a to give exclusively
(E)-styryltrimethylsilane (GC yield >99%). Treatment of (E)-
styryltrimethylsilane with 2 equiv of N-iodosuccinimide
(NIS) in acetonitrile at room temperature according to the
method described by Kishi and co-workers20c allowed
isolation of stereochemically pure (E)-ꢀ-iodostyrene in 90%
yield. Thus, by sequencing the highly (E)-selective silylative
coupling of styrene with a stereospecific iododesilylation,
the stereochemical fidelity of the product is preserved. After
several attempts, we found that iododesilylation of (E)-
styrylsilane occurs efficiently also when the 4:1 mixture of
acetonitrile and toluene is employed as the solvent without
affecting either the reaction yield or the stereoselectivity.
Additionally, we have managed to decrease the necessary
amount of the iodinating agent to 1.2 equiv, making the
reaction more economical.
As we have previously reported, the silylative coupling
of substituted styrenes with vinylsilanes catalyzed by
ruthenium-hydride or ruthenium-silyl complexes occur-
red stereoselectively to give (E)-ꢀ-silylstyrenes in high
yields.16 Since alkyl-substituted vinylsilanes appear to be
inactive in the ruthenium-catalyzed cross-metathesis,17 the
silylative coupling offers an attractive alternative to the
selective synthesis of ꢀ-silyl-substituted vinylarenes.
(10) A recent comparison of euros/mol prices of substituted styrenes
and phenylacetylenes reveals that the former are usually two to ten times
cheaper than the latter. Styrene and 4-chlorostyrene are even 34th and 68th
of the price of their ethynyl analogues (Aldrich catalog, 2008).
(11) Morrill, Ch.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 6031–6034.
(12) Sashuk, V.; Samojłowicz, C.; Szadkowska, A.; Grela, K. Chem.
Commun. 2008, 2468–2470.
(13) (a) Celatka, C. A.; Panek, J. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7043–
7046. (b) Roush, W. R.; Hertel, L.; Schnaderbeck, M. J.; Yakelis, N. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4885–4887. (c) Kim, H. J.; Pongdee, R.; Wu,
Q.; Hong, L.; Liu, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14582–14584.
(14) For recent reviews, see: (a) Marciniec, B. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2005,
249, 2374–2390. (b) Marciniec, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 943–952.
(15) (a) Prukała, W.; Majchrzak, M.; Pietraszuk, C.; Marciniec, B. J.
Mol. Catal.: A. Chem. 2006, 254, 58–63. (b) Marciniec, B.; Majchrzak,
M.; Prukala, W.; Kubicki, M.; Chadyniak, D. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8550–
8555. (c) Prukala, W.; Marciniec, B.; Majchrzak, M.; Kubicki, M.
Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 1107–1115.
This result prompted us to attempt the iododesilylation
step in one pot with silylative coupling without further
purification of the (E)-styryltrimethylsilane intermediate. In
(17) (a) Pietraszuk, C.; Marciniec, B.; Fischer, H. Organometallics 2000,
19, 913–917. (b) Pietraszuk, C.; Fischer, H. Chem. Commun. 2000, 2463–
2464.
(16) (a) Marciniec, B.; Pietraszuk, C. Organometallics 1997, 16, 4320–
4326. (b) Itami, Y.; Marciniec, B.; Majchrzak, M.; Kubicki, M. Organo-
metallics 2003, 22, 1835–1842. (c) Marciniec, B.; Pietraszuk, C.; Jankowska,
M. Pol. Pat. 2002, P-355–875.
(18) For a review, see: Fleming, I.; Barbero, A.; Walter, D. Chem. ReV.
1997, 97, 2063–2192.
(19) (a) Eisch, J. J.; Foxton, M. W. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 3520–
3526. (b) Brook, M. A.; Neuy, A. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 3609–3616
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 15, 2009
3391