C O MMU N I C A T I O N S
The only source of MBH comes from MB+, so we write that
d[MB+]
) - k′f[MB+]2 + k′r([MB+]o - [MB+]) (2)
dt
This expression can be integrated under the constraint that the rate
constants must be real and positive:
2
a - k′r
2k′f
2ak′f[MB+]o
Figure 3. Comparison of the reaction of 1 nM MB+ with 3.1 µM ascorbic
acid in the presence and absence of dissolved oxygen. A plot of conc-1 vs
time is linear for a second-order reaction. At early times, both cases are
similar, but in the presence of oxygen the reaction bends toward equilibrium.
Noise increases with time in an inverse concentration plot.
[MB+]t )
+
(3)
b exp(at) - 2k′f2[MB+]o
2
Here
and
k4
a ) k′ (k′ + 4k′ [MB+] )
(4)
(5)
MB• + MBH+• 98MBH + MB+
(11)
x
r
r
f
o
generates MBH product. Thus, the rate expression for formation
of product, still without taking the back reaction into account,
becomes:
b ) a2 + 2k′f [MB+]o2 + a(k′r + 2k′f[MB+]o)
2
Figure 2 shows the fit of this model to our data.
d[MBH]
) k4(k1[MB+])(k1k2[MB+]) ) k′[MB+]2 (12)
As a check, a log-log plot of k′f vs [H2A] gives a line of slope
of 0.96, essentially unity. This result confirms the pseudo-first-
order dependence imposed by the excess of ascorbic acid. It follows
dt
which is second order in [MB+]. As a test of our model, a reaction
was run in a solution where the solvent was 1% water in acetonitrile.
The native absorption of water at 650 nm prevents us from using
higher concentrations. Nevertheless, sufficient water is present to
act as the proton source for the proton-transfer reaction. First-order
kinetics were observed under these conditions, as expected.
We have demonstrated the use of cavity ring-down spectroscopy
to follow the kinetics of organic reactions whose species are present
in only nanomolar concentrations. This technique may be used to
overcome common difficulties such as extremely poor solubility
or limited quantity of a molecule under study. The straightforward
laser system and experimental setup appear to make this type of
analysis suitable for many applications. Our investigation of
methylene blue reduction kinetics differs from past experiments in
two important respects. First, our increased sensitivity has allowed
us to use much smaller dye concentrations so the relative concentra-
tion of dissolved oxygen is significant. With greater dye concentra-
tion it was necessary to bubble oxygen through solutions to see
the reverse reaction.9 Second, the aprotic solvent acetonitrile
profoundly alters the reaction mechanism, making it second-order
rather than first order in methylene blue.
that the forward rate constant is kf ) k′/[H2A] ) (8.3 ( 1.6) × 103
f
M-1 s-1 and the reverse is k′ ) 86 ( 69 s-1 where the errors
r
represent one standard deviation. The large uncertainty in the reverse
rate likely arises from a combination of factors. The O2 concentra-
tion varies from solution to solution as we did not attempt to control
it. Moreover, the portion of the curve that most affects k′ is late in
r
the reaction when the signal is much closer to the background noise.
Consequently, we believe that we have only determined a range
for kr′ and that it is possible the dependence is more complex than
first order in [MBH]. The forward rate constant, however, is well
defined. As a test of our model, a reaction was run in a solution
that was well sonicated to remove as much of the dissolved oxygen
as possible. The resulting reaction should show a simple second-
order disappearance of MB+ because the reverse reaction should
be negligible. Figure 3 shows a plot of [MB+]-1 vs time that should
be linear in the case of second-order kinetics. Clearly, removal of
oxygen leads to the behavior predicted by our model.
We propose the following mechanism for the second-order
formation of MBH, which is consistent with our kinetic data and
previously reported results.5,6
In water:
Acknowledgment. A.J.H. is grateful for a Veach Memorial
Fellowship and E.S.F.B. is grateful for an NSF Graduate Research
Fellowship. This work is supported by a grant from the Office of
Naval Research (Grant N00014-00-1-0364).
k1
9
MB+ + H2A
8 MB• + H2A+•
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
k2
MB• + H2A+• 98MBH+• + HA•
References
k′2
MB• + H3O + 98 MBH+• + H2O
(1) Jain, S.; Dangi, G.; Vardia, J.; Ameta, S. Int. J. Energy Res. 1999, 23,
71-77.
k3
(2) Owada, T.; Yamada, T.; Abe, H.; Hirayama, J.; Sediguchi, S.; Ikebuchi,
K. J. Med. Virol. 2000, 62, 421-425.
MBH+• + HA•98MBH + HA+
(3) Kirkor, E. S.; Scheeline, A. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 5014-22.
(4) Liu, Y.; Yamamoto, S.; Sueishi, Y. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2001,
143, 153-159.
and the corresponding rate expression for product formation is:
(5) Mowry, S.; Ogren, P. J. Chem. Educ. 1999, 76, 970-973.
(6) Snehalatha, T.; Rajanna, K. C.; Saoprakash, P. K. J. Chem. Educ. 1997,
74, 228-233.
d[MBH]
) k1k′k3[MB+] ) k[MB+]
(10)
(7) Hallock, A. J.; Berman, E. S. F.; Zare, R. N. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 1731-
2
1743.
dt
(8) Berden, G.; Peeters, R.; Meijer, G. Int. ReV. Phys. Chem. 2000, 19, 565-
607.
In acetonitrile, proton transfer from the solvent is not available,
so the proton-transfer step occurs much more slowly. The lifetime
of the MB• intermediate significantly lengthens and the reaction
(9) Resch, P.; Field, R. J.; Schneider, F. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93,
8181-8186.
JA028129R
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 5, 2003 1159