4088 J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 48, No. 9, 2000
Tuck et al.
counter. HPLC radiometric analysis was performed with a
Radiomatic 150TR-flow scintillation analyzer (scintillant flow
2.5 mL/min and HPLC flow 1 mL/min).
Sch em e 1
P r ep a r a tion of Hyd r oxytyr osol w ith LiAlH4. (3,4-Di-
hydroxyphenyl)acetic acid (2) (0.5 g, 3.0 mmols) dissolved in
THF (2.0 mL) was added to an ice-cooled solution of 1.0 M
LiAlH4 in THF (4.5 mL, 4.5 mmol). After the addition was
complete, the suspension was heated under reflux for 3 h and
cooled in an ice bath, and excess LiAlH4 was destroyed by the
careful addition of H2O (10 mL) and 1.0 M HCl (10 mL). The
mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 30 mL). The
combined organic extracts were dried and concentrated in
vacuo. Careful flash chromatography (ethyl acetate/hexanes,
50/50 v/v) gave 1 as a colorless oil (45%). δH: 2.70 (2H, t, J )
6.8 Hz, H1′), 3.75 (2H, t, J ) 6.8 Hz, H2′), 6.70 (1H, dm, J )
8.0 and 2.0 Hz, H6), 6.80 (1H, d, J ) 2.0 Hz, H2), 6.84 (1H, d,
J ) 8.0 Hz, H5).
Tr itia tion of 1 w ith Am ber lyst 15. 1 (46.4 mg), Amberlyst
15 (51.1 mg), T2O (5 mCi/mL, 0.2 mL, 1 Ci), and a magnetic
stirrer (7 mm) were introduced into a Hewlett-Packard HPLC
vial (2 mL capacity). The flask was evacuated with N2, the
top was screwed on, and the flask was placed into an oil bath.
The reaction was heated at 90 °C, with continuous stirring,
for 24 h. On completion the tube was cooled, the solution
removed, and H2O (1 mL) added to the flask to rinse the resin;
this solution was removed and added to the initial solution.
This procedure was repeated three times, to ensure complete
removal of the substrate. Freeze-drying of the solution gave
tritiated hydroxytyrosol (1t) in a recovery yield of 97%. The
residue was dissolved in H2O (2 mL) and purified by prepara-
tive HPLC (95 v/v H2O (containing 2/5 v/v acetic acid/MeOH,
2 mL/min). The eluted substrate in mobile phase (85 mL) was
extracted with ethyl acetate (4 × 80 mL). The combined
organic phases were dried (Na2SO4), and solvent was removed
in vacuo. The specific activity of 1t was found to be 66 Ci/mol.
Sta bility of 1 a t p H 8.85. 1 (1.8 mg) was added to colonic
lavage buffer (5 mL) (Davies et al, 1980). The resulting solution
had a pH of 8.85. Aliquots (100 µL) were added to ependorf
tubes and incubated at 37 °C. At time intervals of 0, 5, 10, 15,
20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 80, 100, and 120 min the ependorf solutions
were diluted with mobile phase (99.5 v/v H2O (containing 0.2/
0.5 v/v acetic acid)/MeOH, 1 mL/min). These solutions were
further diluted (10×) with mobile phase and analyzed by
HPLC. The results are summarized in Figure 3.
P r ep a r a tion of Hyd r oxytyr osol (1) w ith Tetr a bu ty-
la m m on iu m Bor on a te. Preparation of Tetrabutylammonium
Boronate. Tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate (0.34 g, 1.0
mmols) dissolved in H2O (0.2 mL) was added to 5.0 M NaOH
(0.25 mL). To the mixture, cooled in a slurry of ice, was added
NaBH4 (0.04 g, 1.1 mmol) dissolved in H2O (0.1 mL). After
stirring of the reaction mixture for 5 min, it was extracted with
CH2Cl2 (3 × 5 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried
1
and concentrated in vacuo to approximately /3 of the original
volume. The solution was then used directly in the next step.
Preparation of 1 with Tetrabutylammonium Boronate. To a
round-bottom flask containing the above solution of tetrabu-
tylammonium boronate (1.0 mmols) was added (3,4-dihydrox-
yphenyl)acetic acid (2) (0.84 g, 0.5 mmol) dissolved in THF
(0.2 mL). The flask was cooled in an ice bath, and MeI (0.15
mL, 2.0 mmol) was carefully added, so to avoid the excess
evolution of methane. After being stirred for 2 h at room
temperature, the excess hydride was destroyed by the careful
addition of ethanol (10 mL) and 1.0 M HCl (10 mL) to the ice-
cooled solution. The solution was extracted with ethyl acetate
(3 × 30 mL), and the combined organic extracts were dried,
and concentrated in vacuo. Column chromatography (ethyl
acetate/hexanes, 50/50 v/v) gave the product as a light yellow
oil (99%). δH: 2.70 (2H, t, J ) 6.8 Hz, H1′), 3.75 (2H, t, J ) 6.8
Hz, H2′), 6.70 (1H, dm, J ) 8.0 and 2.0 Hz, H6), 6.80 (1H, d,
J ) 2.0 Hz, H2), 6.84 (1H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz, H5).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
P r ep a r a tion of Deu ter a ted Hyd r oxytyr osol (1a ) w ith
Deu ter a ted Tetr a bu tyla m m on iu m Bor on a te. The above
procedure was repeated with tetrabutylammonium hydrogen
A sample of hydroxytyrosol (1) was obtained by
reduction of (3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)acetic acid (2) with
lithium aluminum hydride; spectral data were compa-
rable to that which had previously been published
(Montedoro et al, 1993). However, optimization of this
reaction gave 1 in only a 45% yield after purification
by chromatography. It must be noted that care needs
to be taken during the chromatography as 1 is not stable
on silica. Consequently chromatographic purification
must be performed quickly so that the yield of 1 is
optimized.
In an effort to improve the yield of 1 from its
corresponding acid 2 an alternative reduction reaction
was investigated. Tetrabutylammonium boronate is a
reducing reagent of esters (Bra¨ndstro¨m et al, 1972) and
gives the corresponding alcohols in yields of 80-98%.
Tetrabutylammonium boronate, formed by reaction of
tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate with sodium
borohydride, does reduce 2 to give 1 in a 99% yield
(Scheme 1); spectral data correspond to that of 1
synthesized previously. It was recognized at this stage,
with the use of deuterated or tritiated sodium borohy-
dride, that it was possible to incorporate a label at the
2′ position in 1. Indeed, reaction of 3,4-dihydroxyphe-
nylacetic acid with tetrabutylammonium boronate,
formed by reaction of tetrabutylammonium hydrogen
sulfate with sodium borodeuteride, gave the correspond-
ing deuterated hydroxytyrosol (1a ) in a 56% yield. The
sulfate (3.4 g, 10.0 mmol), D2O (2.0 mL), 5.0 M NaOH (2.5
1
mL), NaBD4 (0.4 g, 11.0 mmol), and D2O (2.0 mL). A
/
10
amount of this mixture was reacted with 2 (0.84 g, 0.5 mmols)
dissolved in THF (0.2 mL). After workup and concentration
the deuterated compound 1a was obtained as a yellow oil in a
56% yield. δH: 2.70 (2H, s, H1′), 6.70 (1H, dm, J ) 8.0 and 2.0
Hz, H6), 6.80 (1H, d, J ) 2.0 Hz, H2), 6.84 (1H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz,
H5).
Deu ter ia tion of 1 w ith Am ber lyst 15. (i) Reaction with
D2O. 1 (24.5 mg), Amberlyst 15 (25.2 mg), D2O (0.2 mL), and
a magnetic stirrer (7 mm) were introduced into a Hewlett
Packard HPLC vial (2 mL capacity). The flask was evacuated
with N2, the top was screwed on, and the flask was placed into
an oil bath. The reaction was heated at 90 °C, with continuous
stirring, for 24 h. On completion the tube was cooled, the
solution removed, and H2O (3 × 0.2 mL) added to the flask to
rinse the resin; this solution was removed and added to the
initial solution. Freeze-drying of the solution gave deuterated
hydroxytyrosol (1d ) in a recovery yield of 98%. Analysis by
1H NMR spectroscopy showed complete disappearance of the
aromatic protons. δH: 2.70 (2H, t, J ) 6.8 Hz, H1′), 3.75 (2H,
t, J ) 6.8 Hz, H2′).
(ii) Reaction with 50% D2O/ H2O. The above procedure was
repeated with 1 (10.9 mg), Amberlyst 15 (12.0 mg), D2O (0.1
mL), and H2O (0.1 mL). The substrate 1d was obtained in a
66% recovery yield. δH: 2.70 (2H, t, J ) 6.8 Hz, H1′), 3.75 (2H,
t, J ) 6.8 Hz, H2′), 6.70 (0.67H, dm, J ) 8.0 and 2.0 Hz, H6),
6.80 (0.67H, d, J ) 2.0 Hz, H2), 6.84 (0.67H, d, J ) 8.0 Hz,
H5).