N. Hu et al.
Inorganica Chimica Acta 482 (2018) 846–853
structure, high surface area and tailored composition, which may be
applied to adsorb compounds, separate gases and perform catalysis
Advance X-ray diffractometer, using Cu Kα radiation (k = 1.5404 Å) at
40 kV and 20 mA in the 2 θ range of 0.5–6.0°. Scanning electron mi-
croscopy (SEM) images of the samples were recorded on a QUANTA
F250 microscope. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was ob-
tained using a Tecnai G2 20 microscope operated at 100 kV. The sul-
phonation degree of SBA-15 was determined by X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS). FTIR was recorded on a Nicolet iS50 FTIR spec-
trometer equipped with a smart collector using pressed KBr powder
discs.
[
18,19]. Specifically, the morphology of SBA-15 can be tailored ac-
cording to the given requirements [20–22], and the independent outer
particle surface and inner pore surfaces can also be functionalized
[
5,23]. SBA-15 might enhance the catalytic activity of the transester-
ification when acid-functionalized [24,25].
Herein, this work screened and compared different solid acid cata-
lysts under identical conditions. In particular, an efficient solid-acid
catalyst, SBA-15-SO
trilaurin in ethanol at temperatures of 160, 180, 200 and 230 °C. The
textural properties of SBA-15-SO H were characterized by BET, XRD,
3
H, was further studied for the transesterification of
2.4. Experimental process
3
SEM, TEM, XPS, FT-IR and Py-FTIR. The yields of each conversion
process were analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography
The experimental device has been described in detail in our pre-
vious work [16]. Transesterification reactions were performed with
triacylglycerol and liquid ethanol with a mass ratio of 1:10. The SBA-
3
5-SO H catalyst with 5.0 wt% loading was placed in the 4-mL reactor,
(
HPLC). Additionally, the mechanism was discussed to provide an in-
sight into the transesterification reactions of solid acid catalysts.
1
which was vertically positioned in a Techne fluidized sand bath (model
SBL-2). In addition, different kinds of catalysts were used, and then, the
best was selected as the core catalyst in this study. The transester-
ification reaction was carried out at a series of temperatures, i.e., 160,
2
. Experimental section
2.1. Materials
1
9
80, 200 and 230 °C, with a series of times of 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 or
0 min. The vessels were removed from the sand bath and cooled to
Triblock copolymer PEO20-PPO70-PEO20 (P123) and tetraethyl
orthosilicate (TEOS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. (3-
Mercaptopropyl) trimethoxysilane (MPTMS, 98%) was purchased from
room temperature. At last, the products were washed with methanol at
least three times so that all products were recovered.
2 4
MACKLIN. Concentrated H SO (AR) and HCl (AR) were purchased
The products were analysed by HPLC equipped with an AcclaimTM
C18 column (4.6 mm i.d. × 250 mm length). HPLC was conducted
using a mobile phase of 65% methanol and 35% acetonitrile at a flow
rate of 0.8 mL/min for 25 min. The UV detector was set at 210 nm, and
the column temperature was 35.0 °C.
from Chengdu Kelong Chemical Reagent Factory (China) and Tianjin
Fengchuan Reagent Technologies Co. Ltd. (China), respectively.
Trilaurin (98%) and ethanol (99.9%) were supplied from Aladdin. All
other chemicals, including SDS, NaCl and NaOH, were analytic grade
and used without any further purification.
3. Results and discussion
2.2. Catalyst preparation
3.1. Screening of transesterifications by triglyceride catalysts
In this study, we choose different template methods for controlling
the morphologies of ZrO
screening the catalyst. We chose different templates and methods to
prepare ZrO , including, for example, ZrO (CaCO ), which used CaCO
cubes as templates to prepare novel ZrO hollow microboxes [26].
ZrO (SDS) was prepared by a lamellar liquid crystal template method,
using sodium dodecyl sulphate as the template to produce compounded
cubic phase spherical zirconia nanopowder [27].
The catalysts were synthesized using P123 as the template, TEOS as
the main silicon source, and MPTMS as an additional source of silicon.
2
, which has been rewritten in the section on
The experiments to screen and compare with different catalysts used
the transesterification of triglycerides with ethanol as a model reaction.
The different morphologies of ZrO produced by different templates,
including ZrO (CaCO ), ZrO (C12 25SO Na), ZrO (C12 25SO Na),
ZrO (CTAB) and solid superacids, such as ZrO /SBA-15, SO /ZrO
H, were tested. A blank reaction
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
H
3
2
H
4
2
2
-
2
2
4
2
,
2-
SO
4 2 3
/ZrO /SBA-15 and SBA-15-SO
was also conducted to make a comparison. The reaction time and
temperature were fixed at 60 min and 200 °C, respectively.
The efficiencies for the transesterification of triglyceride are shown
in Table 1. The triglyceride conversion rate of the blank experiment is
very low, but when the catalysts are introduced, the triglyceride con-
version rates increase significantly, indicating that the catalysts all
possess some catalytic activity for the transesterification of triglycer-
ides. However, the activity of different catalysts varies greatly.
The molar ratios of n(P123)/n(TEOS)/n (MPTMS)/n(HCl)/n(H
2
O)
−4
=
7 × 10 /x/0.004/0.24/6.67, where x represents the molar amount
of TEOS. First, 8 g P123 was dissolved in 195.16 ± 0.01 g deionized
water at room temperature, and the solution was stirred for 2 h. Then,
50.05 ± 0.01 g concentrated hydrochloric acid was added and stirred
for 30 min. Afterwards, 15.35 ± 0.01 g tetraethyl orthosilicate was
added and stirred for 45 min, and then, 1.607 ± 0.01 g MPTMS and
Table 1
1
4
6.73 ± 0.01 g hydrogen peroxide were added, followed by stirring at
0 °C for 20 h. The mixture was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless-
Physicochemical properties and comparison of yield of different catalysts.
steel autoclave, which was then sealed and maintained at 100 °C for
4 h. Lastly, the mixtures were refluxed with 400 mL hydrochloric acid/
Sample
Surface area
Pore volume
(cm /g)
Yield (%)
2
3
(m /g)
2
ethanol solution (volume ratio 2/100) for 12 h to remove the template
P123. The resulting solid products were dried at 80 °C for 8 h to obtain
NO
0
0
1.5
ZrO
ZrO
ZrO
ZrO
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
(CaCO
3
)
67.02
102.01
88.13
69.57
59.87
57.1
63.79
65.42
794.45
567.14
260.53
768.48
0.286
0.39
21.7
38.1
27.5
14.1
19.1
46.7
37.8
49.7
4.7
the SBA-15-SO
.3. Characterization of SBA-15-SO
The N adsorption-desorption isotherms were measured at liquid
3
H.
(C12
(C12
H
H
25SO
25SO
3
Na)
Na)
4
0.393
0.134
0.316
0.137
0.245
0.293
1.036
0.468
0.418
0.891
(CTAB)
2
3
H catalysts
−
2−
SO
SO
4
/ZrO
/ZrO
2
[5%SO
[10%SO
4
(H
2
SO
(H SO
(NH ) SO ]
4
)]
−
2−
4
2
4
2
4
)]
−
2−
2
SO4 /ZrO [5%SO
2
4
4
2
4
2
−
2
nitrogen temperature, −196 °C, on a Micromeritics Tristar 3020 ana-
lyser, from which the specific surface area, pore volume and average
pore diameter were calculated by applying multiple-point Brunauer-
Emmett-Teller (BET) and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) models on ad-
sorption branches. XRD measurements were collected on a Bruker D8
SO
SBA-15
ZrO /SBA-15
4
/ZrO
2
[10%SO
4
(NH
4
)
2
SO
4
]
2
57.7
54.6
88.1
2−
SO
4
2
/ZrO /SBA-15
SBA-15-SO
3
H
847