results constitute unique examples of the use of molecular
containers in the kinetic stabilization of reactive species,
which would otherwise fragment through sigmatropic
rearrangements.
Scheme 1. Proposed Mechanism for the Thermal Decomposition
of Tertiary Prop-2-ynylic N-Oxides 1
Thermally and in nonprotic media, tertiary propargyla-
mine N-oxides undergo a concerted [2,3]-sigmatropic re-
arrangement to yield O-allenyl ethers 2.18,19 In turn, these
O-allenyl ethers are kinetically unstable and experience a
rapid elimination, akin to a [1,5]-hydrogen shift, generat-
ing propenal 3 and the corresponding Schiff base 4.
The kinetic stability of the intermediate O-allenyl ether 2
depends on the substituents on the nitrogen atom.20
We hypothesized that the confinement of 1a in properly
inner functionalized molecular containers could reduce or
even eliminate its tendency to decompose by increasing
the energy difference between bound 1a and the transition
state (TS) leading to the O-allenyl ether 2a, compared to
that of the reaction occurring free in solution. Both the
formation of hydrogen bonds with the oxygen atom of the
N-oxide 1a (reduce oxygen nucleophilicity) and the induc-
tion of steric strain in the cis-conformation of 1a (required
in the TS) seemed to be good starting points to achieve the
goal. Due to the extensive use of aromatic panels to shape
the concave cavities of uni- and supramolecular contain-
ers, it is synthetically challenging to place polar groups in
their interiors.21,22 In addition, the lack of inner functio-
nalizationdisfavors theinclusion of polarguests, rendering
the selectivity of the encapsulation’s process mainly deter-
mined by size and shape complementarity. In trying
to overcome these limitations, we and others have used
aryl-extended calix[4]pyrroles as privileged scaffolds for
the construction of unimolecular23 and supramolecular
containers with polar interiors.24
Figure 1. Molecular structures of N-oxides 1a and 7, containers
5 and 6, and reference compounds 8 and 9. Top right: Side and
top views of the energy-minimized complex 1a⊂5. Note that 1a
must adopt the trans-conformation to fit in the aryl-extended
calix[4]pyrrole binding pocket of 5.
that are structurally related to tetranitro 5 (Figure 1).25 We
demonstrated that N-oxides can be encapsulated alone or
coencapsulated with a CHCl3 molecule in the mechanically
locked capsule 6 (Figure 1).26 Molecular modeling studies
suggested a good match between the trans-conformation of
1a and the size, shape, and functionality of the inner cavities
of the calix[4]pyrrole units of containers 5 and 6. Conver-
sely, the cis-conformer of 1a is not a good fit. Interestingly,
trans-1a forms four hydrogen bonds with the endohedrally
directed pyrrole NHs of the calixpyrrole units of the con-
tainers. Thus, the included/encapsulated trans-1a displays
the features planned above to alter its inherent reactivity
(Figure 1).
The N-oxide of N,N-dimetyl-2-propyn-1-amine, 1a, was
obtained as a white solid in 80% yield from reacting
equimolar amounts of m-chloroperbenzoic acid and the
amine in chloroform solution at 25 °C followed by column
chromatography through alumina.20 N-Oxide 1a was
stable for months when stored as a solid in a refrigerator.
1
In contrast, the H NMR analysis of a 60 mM dichlor-
omethane solution of 1a at 298 K provided evidence for
the decomposition of the N-oxide with the appearance of
proton signals characteristic for propenal 3. The intensity
of the proton signals of 3 grew at the expense of those
assigned to 1a. The observation of the proton signals
corresponding to 3 indicated (a) that the O-allenyl ether
intermediate 2a is not kinetically stable and (b) that the
N-methylenemethanamine 4a, a byproduct of the formal
[1,5]-hydrogen shift reaction, decomposes rapidly.27
1H NMR spectroscopy was used to monitor the decom-
position kinetics of a freshly prepared CD2Cl2 solution of
We previously reported the efficient inclusion of N-oxides
in water-soluble “four-wall” aryl-extended calix[4]pyrroles
(18) Craig, J. C.; Ekwuribe, N. N.; Gruenke, L. D. Tetrahedron Lett.
1979, 20, 4025–4028.
(19) Khuthier, A. H.; Aliraqi, M. A.; Hallstrom, G.; Lindeke, B.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1979, 9–10.
(20) Hallstrom, G.; Lindeke, B.; Khuthier, A. H.; Aliraqi, M. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 667–670.
(21) For recent reviews of inner functionalization of molecular
containers, see: (a) Adriaenssens, L.; Ballester, P. Chem. Soc. Rev.
2013, 42, 3261–3277. (b) Kubik, S. Molecular Cages and Capsules with
Functionalized Inner Surfaces. In Chemistry of Nanocontainers;
Albrecht, M., Hahn, E., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, 2011; Vol. 319, pp 1À34.
(22) Young, M. C.; Johnson, A. M.; Gamboa, A. S.; Hooley, R. J.
Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 1627–1629.
(23) Park, I. W.; Kim, S. K.; Lee, M. J.; Lynch, V. M.; Sessler, J. L.;
Lee, C. H. Chem.;Asian J. 2011, 6, 2911–2915.
(24) Adriaenssens, L.; Ballester, P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 3261–
3277.
(25) Verdejo, B.; Gil-Ramirez, G.; Ballester, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 3178–3179.
(26) Chas, M.; Ballester, P. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 186–191.
(27) Cattoen, X.; Miqueu, K.; Gornitzka, H.; Bourissou, D.;
Bertrand, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3292–3293.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 19, 2013
4977