Green Chemistry
Paper
All product species reported here, with the exception of CO
were recovered in the condenser. All condensed species, with
the exception of MA, were quantitatively analyzed by an Agilent
x
References
1 J. Q. Bond, A. A. Upadhye, H. Olcay, G. A. Tompsett, J. Jae,
R. Xing, D. M. Alonso, D. Wang, T. Y. Zhang, R. Kumar,
A. Foster, S. M. Sen, C. T. Maravelias, R. Malina,
S. R. H. Barrett, R. Lobo, C. E. Wyman, J. A. Dumesic
and G. W. Huber, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7, 1500–
1523.
2 B. J. Nikolau, M. A. D. N. Perera, L. Brachova and
B. Shanks, Plant J., 2008, 54, 536–545.
3 P. N. R. Vennestrøm, C. M. Osmundsen, C. H. Christensen
and E. Taarning, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 10502–
10509.
7
890 GC equipped with an FID detector and an HP-INNOWAX
column. MA was quantified using an Agilent series 1100 HPLC
equipped with a Hi-Plex column. For this analysis, we
employed a pH 2 aqueous H SO mobile phase and quantified
2 4
MA concentrations using a VWD detector. Because of the rela-
tively high temperatures and low water partial pressures in our
reactor, we anticipate that MA exits our reactor as its anhy-
dride; however, because of the aqueous nature of our analysis,
MA was quantified here as maleic acid. The vapor phase (CO
was sent to an in-line chromatograph (GC 7890 Agilent). CO
x
)
2
was resolved from CO using a packed column (Restek Shin-
Carbon ST Micropacked) and quantified via TCD response
relative to a helium reference.
Qualitative product identification was achieved using an
Agilent 7890 GC-MS equipped with an Agilent 5975C MS detec-
tor and an HP-INNOWAX column. Diacid and anhydride peaks
were poorly resolved in the HP-INNOWAX column. To make
qualitative product assignments and confirm the presence of
4 J. Q. Bond, D. Martin Alonso and J. A. Dumesic, in Aqueous
Pretreatment of Plant Biomass for Biological and Chemical
Conversion to Fuels and Chemicals, ed. C. E. Wyman, Wiley
Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2013, ch. 5, pp. 61–102.
5 K. Lohbeck, H. Haferkorn, W. Fuhrmann and N. Fedtke, in
Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH
Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2000, DOI: 10.1002/14356007.
a16_053.
C
4
diacids and anhydrides in our reaction products, the
6 C. Delhomme, D. Weuster-Botz and F. E. Kuhn, Green
Chem., 2009, 11, 13–26.
7 Normal Butane Spot Price, Mont Belvieu, TX, The Wall
Street Journal Database, https://www.quandl.com/data/
WSJ/BUTANE-Butane-normal-Mont-Belvieu-Texas, (accessed
March 2015).
product stream was bubbled through methanol. This con-
verted diacids (succinic, maleic, and fumaric) and their anhy-
drides into their methyl and dimethyl esters, which were easily
resolved via GC-MS and could be identified from their frag-
mentation patterns (ESI†).
8
“Regional Breakdown of Benzene Value Chain Prices”, ICIS
Chemical Business, 2015, 287, 28.
9
T. R. Felthouse, J. C. Burnett, B. Horrell, M. J. Mummey
and Y. J. Kuo, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical
Technology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000, DOI: 10.1002/
0471238961.1301120506051220.a01.pub2.
Conclusion
In summary, we have demonstrated that MA can be produced
in good yield and continuous operation (71%) via aerobic, oxi-
dative cleavage of LA over vanadium oxides. This route is facili- 10 “Maleic Anhydride (MA): 2010 World Market Outlook and
tated through a mechanism that is unique for bifunctional LA
Forecast Been Recently Released by MarketPublishers.
and offers an exciting link between lignocellulosic biomass
com”, Business Wire, 2010.
and large, existing commodity markets. Moreover, the inherent 11 J. Dietrich, “Maleic anhydride”, ICIS Chemical Business,
reactivity of LA may allow the design of a milder, more selec- 2014, 285, 30.
tive oxidation strategy, providing it with a competitive advan- 12 B. Girisuta, L. Janssen and H. J. Heeres, Ind. Eng. Chem.
tage over butane as an MA feedstock. In contrast to prior Res., 2007, 46, 1696–1708.
efforts geared toward biofuel production, this approach could 13 G. M. G. Maldonado, R. S. Assary, J. A. Dumesic and
offer near-term viability and expand the industrial utilization
of lignocellulosic carbon.
L. A. Curtiss, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 8990–8997.
14 D. Martin Alonso, S. G. Wettstein, M. A. Mellmer,
E. I. Gurbuz and J. A. Dumesic, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013,
6, 76–80.
1
1
5 L. E. Manzer, Appl. Catal., A, 2004, 272, 249–256.
6 W. R. H. Wright and R. Palkovits, ChemSusChem, 2012, 5,
1657–1667.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge financial support for this work from
the National Science Foundation (Award number 1454346). We 17 M. G. Al-Shaal, W. R. H. Wright and R. Palkovits, Green
additionally thank Andreas Heyden and Muhammed Mamun Chem., 2012, 14, 1260–1263.
University of South Carolina) for assistance with electronic 18 O. A. Abdelrahman, A. Heyden and J. Q. Bond, ACS Cata.,
(
structure calculations to quantify thermodynamic data for key
2014, 4, 1171–1181.
reactions in the landscape of Fig. 2. Finally, we would like to 19 O. A. Abdelrahman, H. Y. Luo, A. Heyden, Y. Román-
thank Morris Argyle (Brigham Young University) for sharing Leshkov and J. Q. Bond, J. Catal., 2015, 329, 10–21.
his insights regarding the synthesis of oxide-supported 20 I. T. Horvath, H. Mehdi, V. Fabos, L. Boda and L. T. Mika,
vanadates.
Green Chem., 2008, 10, 238–242.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
Green Chem.