New FeII and CuII Complexes Bearing Azathia Macrocycles
formed in a focused MW CEM Discover reactor (10 mL, 13 mm
diameter), fitted with a rotational system and an IR temperature
detector. Typical oxidation reactions were carried out in a sealed
Pyrex tube under focused MW-irradiation as follows: 1-phenyle-
thanol (5.0 mmol), catalyst precursor 1–5 (1–10 μmol) and an acid
additive (5–200 μmol) were introduced into the reactor. An aque-
Chem. Soc. Rev. 1990, 19, 239; c) L. F. Lindoy, G. V. Meehan,
I. M. Vasilescu, H. J. Kim, J.-E. Lee, S. S. Lee, Coord. Chem.
Rev. 2010, 254, 1713.
[
5] For selected examples, see: a) M. Mameli, V. Lippolis, C. Calta-
girone, J. L. Capelo, O. N. Faza, C. Lodeiro, Inorg. Chem. 2010,
4
9, 8276; b) M. Mameli, M. C. Aragoni, M. Arca, M. Atzori,
A. Bencini, C. Bazzicalupi, A. J. Blake, C. Caltagirone, F. A.
Devillanova, A. Garau, M. B. Hursthouse, F. Isaia, V. Lippolis,
B. Valtancoli, Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 9236; c) Y. Yan, Y. Hu,
G. P. Zhao, X. M. Kou, Dyes Pigm. 2008, 79, 210; d) D. A.
Medvetz, K. D. Stakleff, N. Schreiber, P. D. Custer, K. Hindi,
M. J. Panzner, D. D. Blanco, M. J. Taschner, C. A. Tessier, W. J.
Youngs, J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 1703; e) M. W. Glenny, M.
Lacombe, J. B. Love, A. J. Blake, L. F. Lindoy, R. C. Luckay,
K. Gloe, B. Antonioli, C. Wilson, M. Schroder, New J. Chem.
2
ous solution of TBHP (5.0–15.0 mmol, 70% in H O) was added,
and the cylindrical Pyrex reactor was placed in the MW reactor.
The system was left stirring under irradiation for 5–240 min within
the 40–100 °C temperature range.
Caution! Although no problems were encountered in this work, re-
actions of TBHP or H O with organic compounds at elevated tem-
2 2
peratures may be explosive. Such tests should be performed with
due care.
2006, 30, 1755; f) M. Shamsipur, T. Poursaberi, M. Rezapour,
M. R. Ganjali, M. F. Mousavi, V. Lippolis, D. R. Montesu,
Electroanalysis 2004, 16, 1336; g) C. A. Grapperhaus, M. Li,
A. K. Patra, S. Poturovic, P. M. Kozlowski, M. Z. Zgierski,
M. S. Mashuta, Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 4382; h) A. H. Alberts,
J.-M. Lehn, D. Parker, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1985, 2311.
6] L. F. Lindoy, R. J. Smith, Inorg. Chem. 1981, 20, 1314.
After the reaction, the mixture was allowed to cool. A power of
1
0 W was selected for all experiments, as it was previously
[
13a]
found
that 5 W is not sufficient to maintain the desired reaction
temperature, and a higher power (e.g. 20 W) does not improve the
product yield.
[
Conventional Method: For comparative purposes, several tests were
also carried out with conventional heating in air using 25 mL
round-bottomed flasks equipped with a reflux condenser. Under
typical conditions, the catalyst precursor (10 μmol) was placed into
the flask, followed by the addition of 1-phenylethanol (5.0 mmol),
an acid additive (200 μmol) and TBHP (10.0 mmol, 70% in H O).
2
In all cases, the reaction mixtures were vigorously stirred for 30 min
with magnetic stirrers. The desired reaction temperature (typically
[7] G. Fritz, B. Steinfeld, B. Kersting, Z. Naturforsch. B 2007, 62,
508.
[
[
8] R. Bentfeld, N. Ehlers, R. Mattes, Chem. Ber. 1995, 128, 1199.
9] a) L. Que Jr., W. B. Tolman, Nature 2008, 455, 333; b) J. T.
Groves, J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006, 100, 434; c) H. M. Berman, J.
Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N.
Shindyalov, P. E. Bourne, Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235.
10] a) R. Balasubramanian, S. M. Smith, S. Rawat, L. A. Yatsu-
nyk, T. L. Stemmler, A. C. Rosenzweig, Nature 2010, 465, 115;
b) R. A. Himes, K. Barnese, K. D. Karlin, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2010, 49, 6714; c) R. A. Himes, K. D. Karlin, Curr. Opin.
Chem. Biol. 2009, 13, 119; d) M. Merkx, D. A. Kopp, M. H.
Sazinsky, J. L. Blazyk, J. Muller, S. J. Lippard, Angew. Chem.
[
80 °C) was maintained with an oil bath.
Extraction and GC Analyses: In the methods mentioned above, the
reaction samples (after cooling to ambient temperature) were
treated with 5 mL of MeCN and 300 μL of benzaldehyde (GC in-
ternal standard). The aliquots were placed into Eppendorf vials
and centrifuged. Diethyl ether was added to dilute the sample fol-
lowed by GC analyses. Blank tests indicate that only traces of ace-
tophenone were generated in the absence of metal catalyst precur-
sor in the conventional method, whereas under MW irradiation the
formation of acetophenone does not exceed 6% in the metal-free
system.
2
001, 113, 2860; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2782; e) I.
Schlichting, J. Berendzen, K. Chu, A. M. Stock, S. A. Maves,
D. E. Benson, B. M. Sweet, D. Ringe, G. A. Petsko, S. G. Sli-
gar, Science 2000, 287, 1615; f) E. I. Solomon, U. M. Sunda-
ram, T. E. Machonkin, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2563.
[11]
For selected reviews, see: a) I. Siewert, C. Limberg, Chem. Eur.
J. 2009, 15, 10316; b) S. Friedle, E. Reisner, S. J. Lippard,
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 2768; c) E. A. Lewis, W. B. Tolman,
Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1047; d) M. Costas, M. P. Mehn, M. P.
Jensen, L. Que Jr., Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 939; e) E. Y. Tshuva,
S. J. Lippard, Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 987; f) P. Gamez, P. G.
Aubel, W. L. Driessen, J. Reedijk, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001, 30,
376.
Acknowledgments
This work has been partially supported by the Foundation for Sci-
ence and Technology (FCT), Portugal, its Strategy Programme
PEst-OE/Qui/U10100/2011 and Science 2007 programs. R. R. F.
thanks the FCT for a doctoral grant. We acknowledge Dr. M. C.
Oliveira for ESI-MS measurements (IST-node of the RNEM/
FCT).
[12] For recent examples, see: a) Y. Y. Karabach, M. F. C. Gu-
edes da Silva, M. N. Kopylovich, B. Gil-Hernández, J. Sanchiz,
A. M. Kirillov, A. J. L. Pombeiro, Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49,
11096; b) A. M. Kirillov, J. A. S. Coelho, M. V. Kirillova,
M. F. C. Guedes da Silva, D. S. Nesterov, K. R. Gruenwald, M.
Haukka, A. J. L. Pombeiro, Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 6390; c)
M. V. Kirillova, A. M. Kirillov, A. J. L. Pombeiro, Chem. Eur.
J. 2010, 16, 9485; d) M. V. Kirillova, Y. N. Kozlov, L. S. Shul’p-
ina, O. Y. Lyakin, A. M. Kirillov, E. P. Talsi, A. J. L. Pombeiro,
G. B. Shul’pin, J. Catal. 2009, 268, 26; e) M. V. Kirillova, A. M.
Kirillov, A. J. L. Pombeiro, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 2936;
f) M. V. Kirillova, A. M. Kirillov, M. L. Kuznetsov, J. A. L.
Silva, J. J. R. Fraústo da Silva, A. J. L. Pombeiro, Chem. Com-
mun. 2009, 2353; g) M. L. Kuznetsov, A. J. L. Pombeiro, Inorg.
Chem. 2009, 48, 307.
[
1] a) L. F. Lindoy, The Chemistry of Macrocyclic Ligand Com-
plexes, Cambridge University Press, 1990; b) Macrocyclic
Chemistry: Current Trends and Future Perspectives (Ed.: K.
Gloe), Springer, 2005; c) N4-macrocyclic Metal Complexes
(
Eds.: J. H. Zagal, F. Bedioui, J.-P. Dodelet), Springer, 2006.
[
2] a) X. Y. Liang, P. J. Sadler, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 246; b)
K. P. Wainwright, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1997, 166, 35; c) S. R.
Cooper, Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 141; d) P. Chaudhuri, K.
Wieghardt, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 35, 329; e) S. G. Murray, [13] For recent examples, see: a) P. J. Figiel, M. N. Kopylovich, J.
F. R. Hartley, Chem. Rev. 1981, 81, 356.
Lasri, M. F. C. Guedes da Silva, J. J. R. Fraústo da Silva,
A. J. L. Pombeiro, Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2766; b) P. J. Fig-
iel, A. M. Kirillov, M. F. C. Guedes da Silva, J. Lasri, A. J. L.
Pombeiro, Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 9879; c) M. V. Kirillova,
A. M. Kirillov, D. Mandelli, W. A. Carvalho, A. J. L. Pom-
beiro, G. B. Shul’pin, J. Catal. 2010, 272, 9; d) P. J. Figiel,
[
[
3] See the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, version 5.31,
August 2010): F. H. Allen, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 2002, 58,
380.
4] For reviews, see: a) J. P. Danks, N. R. Champness, M. Schroder,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 174, 417; b) G. Reid, M. Schroder,
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 3781–3790
© 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjic.org
3789