Notes
Sch em e 2. P r op osed Mech a n ism of Hyd r ogen
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 67, No. 1, 2002 313
corresponding epoxides with 48% HBr in diethyl ether (com-
pounds 1a -3a , 6a , and 8a ).11 2-Chloro- and 2-iodocyclohexanol
were prepared from cyclohexene oxide and the corresponding
acid. Spectral and/or other data for halohydrins are reported
elsewhere.1
Br om id e Elim in a tion fr om Br om oh yd r in s
0,12-17
2
-Br om o-3-h yd r oxy-3-p h en ylp r op yl Aceta te (9a ). A total
of 2.0 mmol of (E)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-yl acetate was added
dropwise to the stirred solution of N-bromosaccharin (2.0 mmol)
in 4 mL of acetonitrile-water mixture (3:1 v/v). The reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h, diluted with
diethyl ether, washed with sodium hydrogen carbonate and
water, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and concentrated
in vacuo. The crude product was purified by chromatography
(
3
silica gel, CH
-phenylpropyl acetate as a white solid which was recrystallized
from CH Cl /hexane, mp 45-46 °C. The crystallized compound
contains one molecule of water, otherwise it is an oil. H NMR
CDCl , δ/ppm): 2.02 (s, 3H), 4.33 (dd, J ) 11.5, 4.1 Hz, 1H),
2 2
Cl ) to afford 151 mg (55%) of 2-bromo-3-hydroxy-
alkyl radical that in turn eliminates a â-halogen atom,
thus forming a double bond (Scheme 2).
2
2
1
This process is feasible only in the case of bromohy-
drins since the enthalpy of a π-bond formation is com-
(
4
3
.44 (m, 1H), 4.52 (dd, J ) 11.5, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.01 (d, J ) 6.1
7
parable with C-Br bond dissociation energy. In chloro-
Hz, 1H), 7.35 (m, 5H). 13C NMR (CDCl , δ/ppm): 20.6, 55.5, 64.2
3
+
hydrins, the C-Cl bond is considerably stronger, causing
the elimination of a chlorine atom to be unfavorable. In
iodohydrins, a competing abstraction of iodine atom
predominates, at least in solvent cyclohexane, where
nucleophilic cyclohexyl radicals are present.
74.9, 126.4, 128.3, 128.5, 139.5, 170.8. MS (EI): 274 (M + 2,
+
0
.8), 272 (M , 0.8), 193 (5), 149 (10), 133 (62), 107 (100), 105
(
63), 91 (17), 79 (45), 77 (32). Anal. Calcd for C11
H
13BrO
3
2
‚xH O:
C, 45.38; H, 5.19. Found: C, 45.29; H 5.43.
1
-(3-Tr iflu or om eth ylp h en yl)-2-br om oeth a n ol. Oil (57%).
1
H NMR (CDCl , δ/ppm): 3.53 (dd, J ) 10.6, 8.7 Hz, 1H), 3.66
3
The nature of the hydrogen abstracting radical is
obviously electrophilic, in this case tert-butoxy radical or
bromine atom. A Hammett plot for the elimination of
HBr from substituted 1-aryl-2-bromoethanols (3-trifluo-
romethyl, H and 4-methyl) shows a linear correlation
with F ) -1.0, which is comparable to, for example,
(dd, J ) 10.6, 3.4 Hz, 1H) 5.00 (dm, J ) 8.5 Hz, 1H) 7.48-7.68
ppm (m, 4H). 13C NMR (CDCl
, δ/ppm): 39.7, 73.1, 122.9, 124.0
3
(
q, J ) 272 Hz), 125.2, 129.2, 129.4, 131.1 (q, J ) 32 Hz), 141.5.
1
9
+
F NMR (CDCl
3
, δ/ppm (CFCl
3
)): -63.2 (s). MS (EI): 270 (M
+
+
2, 0.2), 268 (M , 0.2), 175 (100), 159 (8), 145 (16), 127 (50).
Anal. Calcd for C
H, 2.89.
9 8 3
H BrF O: C, 40.18; H, 3.00. Found: C, 39.90;
8
bromination of toluene. Moreover, a nucleophilic alkyl
Products were identified by NMR and/or GC-MS and data
were compared with those of authentic materials or literature.
Elim in a tion s: Gen er a l P r oced u r e. A total of 0.2 mmol of
bromohydrin and 0.03 mmol of DBPO were dissolved in 2 mL
of cyclohexane and placed in a flask, fitted with a reflux
condenser. The solution was purged with argon and warmed in
a water bath gradually from about 50 °C to reflux, during 15
min, and left at reflux for additional 10 min. The composition
of the reaction mixture was then analized by GC. In preparative
runs (2 mmol of bromohydrin, 0.3 mmol of DBPO in 5 mL of
cyclohexane) the reaction mixtures were diluted with ether,
washed with sodium hydrogen carbonate and water, and dried
with anhydrous sodium sulfate and the solvent was evaporated
under reduced pressure.
radical would most probably abstract a halogen atom
rather than an R-hydrogen.
In certain cases we have observed a minor side reac-
tion, namely the formation of a 2-bromoketone, which
could be formed by the abstraction of a hydroxyl hydrogen
atom from R-hydroxyalkyl radical by a bimolecular
radical process and could therefore be suppressed by
working at lower temperature. The most efficient proce-
dure was found to be the warming of the reaction mixture
in a water bath starting at 50-60 °C to reflux (of
cyclohexane) during 15 min. In preparative runs or in
cases of acid sensitive compounds, the reaction mixture
was continuously purged with inert gas during the course
of reaction.
The most suitable radical initiator proved to be di-tert-
butyl peroxyoxalate, since it is a clean source of alkoxyl
radicals. Initiation with dibenzoyl peroxide led to the
formation of a complex mixture. The amount of initiator
necessary for complete conversion is variable, but in most
cases 10-20 mol % (based on the starting bromohydrin)
is adequate.
Rela tive Ra tes of Elim in a tion of HBr fr om Su bstitu ted
1-P h en yl-2-br om oeth a n ols. A solution of substituted 2-bromo-
1
ethanol (0.2 mmol), and DBPO (0.01 mmol) in 2 mL of cyclo-
hexane was purged with argon, warmed as described above, and
3 3
-phenylethanol (4-CH , 3-CF , 0.2 mmol), 2-bromo-1-phenyl-
analyzed by GC. The relative rates k
the integrated rate equation k /k ) ln(A/A
is the amount of substituted bromohydrin and B is the amount
of unsubstituted bromohydrin at the end of the reaction. A and
are the amounts of bromohydrins at the begining of the
X
/k
H
were calculated using
X
H
o
)/ln(B/B ), where A
o
o
B
o
reaction. The measurement was made as a one-point kinetic
determination and the values thus obtained are: k(4-Me)/k(H)
)
The reaction may suggest a new efficient way for
conversion of bromohydrins or, indirectly, even alkenes
to ketones and is also successful with acid or base
sensitive compounds, such as esters.
1.52 and k(3-CF
3
)/k(H) ) 0.38.
J O016113Y
(10) Dalton, D. R.; Dutta, V. P.; J ones, D. C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1968,
9
4
0, 5498.
Exp er im en ta l Section
(11) Chini, M.; Crotti, P.; Gardelli, C.; Macchia, F. Tetrahedron 1992,
8, 3805.
(12) Masuda, H.; Takase, K.; Nishio, M.; Hasegawa, A.; Nishiyama,
Gen er a l. Bromohydrins 4a , 5a , 7a , 9a , and 10a were
synthesized from alkenes and NBS or, preferably, N-bromosac-
Y.; Ishii, Y. J . Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5550.
9
10
(13) Caputo, R.; Ferreri, C.; Noviello, S.; Palumbo, G. Synthesis 1986,
, 499.
charin in aqueous acetonitrile or DMSO or by the reaction of
6
(
14) Kraus, G. A.; Gottschalk, P. J . Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 2111.
(
7) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 76th ed.; Lide, D. R.,
(15) Cowell, A.; Stille, J . K.; J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4193.
(16) Traynham, J . G.; Schneller, J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 2398.
(17) Wilson, M. A.; Woodgate, P. D. J . Chem Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1995.
(
(
8) Amey, R. L.; Martin, J . C. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 3060.
9) Zajc, B. Synth. Commun. 1999, 29, 1779.
1976, 141.