C. Li et al. / Catalysis Communications 54 (2014) 27–30
29
monodispersed silica spheres
N
Table 2
a
The effect of different iridium loadings for hydrogenation of acetophenone .
Entry
Load capacity/%
Conv./%
Ee/%
Config.
N
1
2
3
1
2
3
2.5
86.3
71.8
79.2
91.6
90.0
S
S
S
H
N
H
O
X
H
H
O
H
O
H
O
H
O
H
O
H
O
a
Substrate/Ir = 300/1, acetophenone: 0.856 mol/L,9-amino(9-deoxy)epicinchonine:
2.8 × 10− mol/L, LiOH: 0.025 mol/L, 25 °C, 6 MPa, 3 h.
3
iridium
3 3
Scheme 1. Proposed hydrogen model. X: F, Cl, Br, OCH , and CF .
that the enantioselectivity of acetophenone had little variation
(Table 1, entries 1–4) over the range of silanol concentration increasing
from 11.7 to 15.0 millimole/g. According to the proposed hydrogen
model, the steric effect was not different when the substrate was same.
That was the reason the amount of surface silanols had no significant ef-
fect on asymmetry of the same substrate hydrogenation. However, the
experiment data suggests that increased concentration of silanols im-
proved the activity.
addition, the activity of acetophenone significantly increased from
3
1
8.9% to 71.8% (Table 1, entries 1–4) with silanols increasing from
1.7 to 15.0 millimole/g. In particular, the catalyst 3%Ir/SiO (d)/2tpp
2
with the most silanols exhibited the highest activity (71.8%) (Table 1,
entry 4). These results suggest that the effect of silanols was higher
than the effect of surface areas and pore diameters. Interestingly, the
surface silanols vastly enhanced the activity but had no effect on the
enantioselectivity of asymmetric hydrogenation of acetophenone. This
prompted us to study the model of asymmetric hydrogenation.
As early as 1979, Orito et al. reported the first asymmetric hydroge-
nation of prochiral ketocarbonyls using chiral modified supported plat-
inum catalysts [20]. Subsequently, a number of mechanisms have been
proposed for the Orito reaction and recent surface science studies
indicate that a second H-bonding interaction may occur in the adsorbed
2
According to the catalytic activity from Table 1, the SiO (d) was cho-
sen to be the best support. The catalysts at various iridium loadings (1, 2
and 3%) were prepared. The reaction solution was tested by ICP and no
iridium ions were detected after the catalysts were prepared demonstrat-
ing that all iridium ions were adsorpted on the supports. The asymmetric
hydrogenation data was summarized in Table 2. The 2%Ir/SiO (d)/2tpp
2
performed the highest catalytic activity and enantioselectivity (Table 2,
entry 2) and was selected as the catalyst in the following examinations.
The HTEM picture of 2%Ir/SiO
nanoclusters were highly dispersed on the SiO
2
(d)/2tpp showed that iridium
. The average diameter
1
:1 modifier–substrate complex [21–26]. According to the generalized
2
two-point H-bonding model [27], we speculate that there was an inter-
action carried out through H-bond between substrate and silanols for
the heterogeneous asymmetric hydrogenation of aromatic ketones
of iridium nanoclusters was about 3.0 nm. XPS analysis indicated that
Ir 4f7/2 core level centered at 61.6 eV which is a reduced state compared
to Ir (0) (Ir 4f7/2 core level centered at 60.8 eV) [32]. The full range XPS
(Scheme 1). IR spectroscopy was one of standard methods to investigate
2
spectra indicated that the amount of Ir supported on the SiO is 2%wt./wt.
hydrogen bonds in the solid state [28]. 1-(2-Fluorophenyl)ethanone was
selected as subject of study because of its strong electronegativity. As
The effect of the different reaction factors on the asymmetric hydro-
genation of acetophenone was tested (see supporting information).
Methanol and LiOH were the best solvent and base respectively in the
reaction. N99% conversion and good enantioselectivity of up to 87.6%
were obtained while MeOH/LiOH was examined. The combination of
iPrOH and KOH was also investigated in our catalytic system. Just
shown in Fig. 2, the red line was the IR spectrum of 3%Ir/SiO
2
(d)/2tpp
adsorbing 1-(2-fluorophenyl)ethanone. A new weak sharp peak at
−
1
3
680 cm was confirmed by FTIR methods. The peak was due to the
H–F interaction between fluoro- and silanols compared to experimental
−
1
−1
(
3687 cm ) and theoretical frequencies (3640 cm ) [29–31]. This
11.0% conversion and 48.9% enantioselectivity were obtained, although
demonstrated that a hydrogen bond was formed between substrates
and catalyst. Due to the hydrogen bonding, steric effects influence the
asymmetry of hydrogenation as shown in Scheme 1. It is noteworthy
the iPrOH/KOH was identified as the best combination for hydrogena-
tion of aromatic ketones. A high concentration of the base and modifier
was needed in our catalytic system. The effect of hydrogen pressure on
the reaction was also examined. When the reactions were run at high
hydrogen pressure (6–7 MPa), the activity and enantioselectivity of
the catalytic system were maintained (N99% conversion, 87.6–88.9%
ee). However, when the hydrogen pressure decreased to 5 MPa, the
conversion dropped (79.4%) while the enantioselectivity (89.7%)
remained. When the pressure was further reduced to 4 MPa, the con-
version (47.3%) and the enantioselectivity (72.8%) were reduced. In ad-
dition, less than 1% conversion was observed with no hydrogen when
the base and the solvent were instead KOH and iPrOH. According to
the procedures reported by G. Szőllősi et al. [33], additional experiments
were carried out to clarify the effect of support acidity on activity and
enantioselectivity. The acetophenone was hydrogenated with the cata-
lyst treated by 5% aqueous NaOH solution and low conversion and low
enantioselectivity were obtained.
A representative range of simple aromatic ketones divided into three
categories (ortho-substituted, para-substituted and un-substituted
substrate) respectively was hydrogenated with the catalyst 2%Ir/
SiO
2
(d)/2tpp. The results obtained were shown in Table 3. In general,
excellent conversions and high enantioselectivities were obtained for
all tested aromatic ketones. When the steric bulk of substituent was
larger, the enantioselectivity and activity were lower. As previously
reported research, the steric and the electronic effect commonly
influences the activity and the enantioselectivity in the asymmetric
Fig. 2. The IR spectrum. A: The IR spectrum of 3%Ir/SiO
of 3%Ir/SiO (d)/2tpp adsorbing 1-(2-fluorophenyl)ethanone; and. C: the IR spectrum of
-(2-fluorophenyl)ethanone.
2
(d)/2tpp; B: the IR spectrum
2
1