Chemistry Letters 2001
451
tures decreased to 323 K, the formation of cyclohexadiene rather
than cyclohexene were predominant. Cyclohexadiene was formed
with a 1,4-/1,3-isomer ratio of 1–4, depending on the reaction con-
ditions applied. Cyclohexane was scarcely formed at 323 K.
The reaction times were prolonged, but the benzene conver-
sion was not so raised. This is partly due to that the precipitates
changed in quality during the reaction and that the hydrogenation
consists of processes proceeding stoichiometrically and catalyti-
cally. The europium and ytterbium exhibited similar reducing
properties, but the ytterbium was superior to the europium in
activity.
The reducing behavior of the lanthanide precipitates marked-
ly depended upon the conditions separating out from the Eu or Yb
metal solutions in liquid ammonia during the preparation process.
It has been reported that the liquid ammonia solutions of lan-
thanide metals decompose through metal, amide or imide to final-
ly convert into nitride.8 To obtain information as to the structural
changes of precipitates, XRD powder patterns were measured
without exposure to air. XRD of precipitates obtained when the
Yb metal in liquid ammonia was permitted to stand for 1 h,
showed the existence of metallic Yb with additional diffraction
peaks at 2θ = 29.8, 34.5, 49.7 and 59.0°, while on standing for 12
h, the Yb precipitates (No. 2) consisted primarily of diamide and
triamide. The crystallite sizes for the Yb metallic phase were
estimated as ca. 12–15 nm from XRD.
The lanthanide precipitates acted more effectively in the pres-
ence of ammonia, although the mechanism of its action in the
reducing process was not appreciably proved yet. As shown in
Table 2, the benzene conversion and the selectivity were enhanced
in the presence of ammonia. Upon addition of ammonia gas of
1000 cm3 to the reaction system, the benzene conversion
increased by a factor of about 2 (Nos. 1 and 10).
Moreover, the reaction results of the lanthanide precipitates
as prepared and otherwise were quite different (Tables 1 and 2).
The precipitates (Nos. 1, 4, 7 and 12) were used more efficiently
when subjected to the reaction immediately after the preparation,
in contrast to the precipitates (Nos. 3, 6, 8 and 13) kept once in an
atmosphere of dry nitrogen after preparation, respectively. The
"stale" lanthanides (Nos. 3, 6 and 8) exhibited very low activity
for the hydrogenation of benzene with hydrogen. A very impor-
tant characteristic of such precipitates is that upon addition of
ammonia the reducing power was restored to some extent. Even
if hydrogen was not used, benzene was reduced with ammonia
(No. 14); the transfer hydrogenation of benzene with ammonia
occurred. It has been shown that the lanthanides promote the cat-
alytic transfer hydrogenation with ammonia as a hydrogen
source.9 That the ammonia directly participates in the hydrogena-
tion is likely responsible for the selective formation of cyclohex-
ene or cyclohexadiene. For the hydrogenation of benzene using
both hydrogen and ammonia, the conversion of benzene was natu-
rally higher than that for the hydrogenation with ammonia.
The hydrogenation of benzene to cyclohexadiene is known as
the Birch reaction: when benzene is reduced by sodium in liquid
ammonia, usually in the presence of alcohol, 1,4-addition of
hydrogen takes place to yield cyclohexadiene.10 The reduction is
known as homogeneously dissolving metal reductions in which
direct electron transfer from the Na metal to the benzene ring with
subsequent protonation by alcohol is involved. Unlike the Birch
reduction, the present system was heterogeneous, and besides, no
alcohol was added to the reaction system. As described above,
the addition of ammonia to the reaction system led to the
increased conversion of benzene, in which ammonia acted as a
promoter, as well as a hydrogen donor. Thus, it is understandable
on the basis of the comparison of Nos. 14 and 15 that the ammo-
nia promotes the lanthanide precipitates, resulting in an increase in
the benzene conversion for the hydrogenation by hydrogen.
References
1
2
A. W. Weitkamp, Adv. Catal., 18, 1 (1968).
E. L. Muetterties and J. R. Bleeke, Acc. Chem. Res., 12, 324
(1979).
3
4
R. L. Burwell, Jr., Chemtracts: Inorg. Chem., 5, 330 (1993).
H. Imamura, “The Metal and Alloys (Prepared Utilizing Liquid
Ammonia Solutions) in Catalysis II,” in “Handbook on the Physics
and Chemistry of Rare Earths,” ed. by K. A. Gschneidner, Jr. and
L. Eyring, North-Holland, Amsterdam (2000), Vol. 29, p. 45.
C. Thompson, “Electrons in Liquid Ammonia,” Clarendon Press,
Oxford (1976).
5
6
H. Nagahara, M. Ono, and Y. Fukuoka, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 92,
375 (1995).
7
8
F. Doebert and J. Gaube, Catal. Lett., 31, 431 (1995).
K. Howell and L. L. Pytlewski, J. Less-Common Met., 19, 399
(1969).
9
H. Imamura, Y. Miura, K. Fujita, Y. Sakata, and S. Tsuchiya, J.
Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 140, 81 (1999).
10 A. A. Akhrem, I. G. Reshotova and Yu. A. Titov, “Birch
Reduction of Aromatic Compounds,” Plenum, New York (1972).