Angewandte
Chemie
Res. 2001, 34, 319; d) M. J. Zaworotko, B. Moulton, Chem. Rev.
heterogeneous nature of the present asymmetric catalytic
systems. We have further confirmed the heterogeneous nature
of the present systems using direct current plasma (DCP)
spectroscopy. DCP results indicated that less than 0.01% of
the ruthenium has leached into the organic solution for each
round of hydrogenation.
We have also successfully reused the Zr-Ru-L1 system for
asymmetric hydrogenation of methyl acetoacetate without
significant deterioration of enantioselectivity. The Zr-Ru-L1
system was used for five cycles of hydrogenation with
complete conversions and ee values of 93.5, 94.2, 94.0, 92.4,
and 88.5%, respectively.
In summary, we have synthesized novel chiral porous
zirconium phosphonates. These ruthenium-containing chiral
porous solids have been used for heterogeneous asymmetric
hydrogenation of b-keto esters with ee values of up to 95%
and can be readily recycled and reused. Ready tunability of
such a molecular building-block approach will allow the
optimization of the catalytic performance of these hybrid
materials and lead to practically useful heterogeneous
asymmetric catalysts.
2001, 101, 1629; e) P. J. Hagrman, D. Hagrman, J. Zubieta,
Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 2798; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
2638; f) C. Janiak, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 1499; Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 1431.
[2] a) A. Clearfield, Z. Wang, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 2002,
2937; b) G. Alberti, Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry,
Vol. 7, Pergamon, New York, 1996.
[3] a) M. P. Kapoor, Q. Yang, S. Inagaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 15176; b) S. Inagaki, S. Guan, T. Ohsuna, O. Terasaki,
Nature 2002, 416, 304 – 307.
[4] a) O. R. Evans, H. L. Ngo, W. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
10395; b) H. L. Ngo, W. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14298;
c) Y. Cui, O. R. Evans, H. L. Ngo, P. S. White, W. Lin, Angew.
Chem. 2002, 114, 1207; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1159;
d) J. S. Seo, D. Whang, H. Lee, S. I. Jun, J. Oh, Y. J. Jeon, K. Kim,
Nature 2000, 404, 982.
[5] a) R. Noyori, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 2108; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 2008, and references therein; b) W. S. Knowles,
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 3 – 13; c) Y.-G. Zhou, W. Tang, W.-
B. Wang, W. Li, X. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4952.
[6] a) R. Noyori, H. Takaya, Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23, 345; b) M.
Kitamura, T. Ohkuma, S. Inoue, N. Sayo, H. Kumobayashi, S.
Akutagawa, T. Ohta, H. Takaya, R. Noyori, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1988, 110, 629; c) Z. Zhang, H. Qian, J. Longmire, X. Zhang, J.
Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6223.
[7] Q. H. Fan, Y.-M. Li, A. S. C. Chan, Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 3385,
and references therein.
Experimental Section
Zr-Ru-L1: L1-H4 was synthesized in three steps from 2,2’-dihydroxy-
1,1’-binaphthyl-6,6’-bis(diethylphosphonate) and treated with
[{Ru(benzene)Cl2}2] (0.46 equivalents) in DMF at 1008C under
argon for 40 min and then cooled to 408C. All the volatile
components were removed under vacuum, and the dark-red solid
was directly used for the synthesis of Zr-Ru-L1 solid precatalyst. This
solid was first dissolved in anhydrous degassed methanol, and heated
overnight under reflux with Zr(OtBu)4 (1 equivalent). After centri-
fugation and rinsing with anhydrous methanol three times, the residue
was dried under vacuum to give a dark-brown solid in 96% yield. This
dark-brown solid is not soluble in common organic solvents including
methanol. Elemental analysis (%) calcd for C52H52Cl2N2O10P4RuZr,
[Zr{Ru(L1)(dmf)2Cl2}]·2MeOH: C 49.9, H 4.19, N 2.24, Cl 5.66, P
9.90, Ru 8.07, Zr 7.29; found: C 50.6, H 3.87, N 2.54, Cl 4.98, P 9.32,
Ru 7.87, Zr 7.70.
[8] a) A. Clearfield, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 47, 371; b) G. Alberti,
U. Costantino, F. Marmottini, R. Vivani, P. Zappelli, Angew.
Chem. 1993, 105, 1396; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32,
1357; c) T. E. Mallouk, J. A. Gavin, Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31,
209.
[9] M. Kant, S. Bischoff, R. Siefken, E. Gruendemann, A. Koeckritz,
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 477.
[10] A slight excess of ligand is used to ensure that no ligand-free Ru
centers are present in the solid catalyst.
[11] There may also be residual protons on the bisphosphonic acids
À
that contribute to the O H stretching vibrations.
[12] Both [Ru(L1-H4)(dmf)2Cl2] and [Ru(L2-H4)(dmf)2Cl2] gave
98.3% ee for homogeneous hydrogenation of methyl acetoace-
tate in MeOH.
[13] This level of TOF value is comparable to those reported in the
literature for the Ru-bisphosphane catalysts. See: H.-U. Blaser,
C. Malan, B. Pugin, F. Spindler, H. Steiner, M. Studer, Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 103.
[14] The homogeneous Ru-binap catalyst gave an ee value of 80.3%
for hydrogenation of ethyl benzoylacetate.
General procedure for catalysis: Methyl acetoacetate (55 mL,
0.5 mmol) and anhydrous methanol (1 mL) were added to solid
precatalyst (6.0 mg, 5 mmole) in a test tube under argon. The test tube
was quickly transferred into a stainless steel autoclave, and sealed.
After purging with H2 six times, the final H2 pressure was adjusted to
1400 psi or 700 psi (9652.664 and 4826.332 kPa). H2 pressure was
released 20 h later, and methanol was removed in vacuo. The
hydrogenated product was extracted with diethyl ether and passed
through a mini silica-gel column. The conversions were assessed
based on the integration of peaks in the 1H NMR spectra of the
products and starting materials, while the ee values were determined
using chiral GC.
Received: February 24, 2003
Revised: June 10, 2003 [Z51264]
Keywords: asymmetric catalysis · hybrid materials ·
.
hydrogenation · ruthenium · supported catalysts · zirconium
[1] a) J.-M. Lehn, Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and Per-
spectives, VCH, New York, 1995; b) O. R. Evans, W. Lin, Acc.
Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 511; c) M. Eddaoudi, D. B. Moler, H. Li, B.
Chen, T. M. Reineke, M. O'Keeffe, O. M. Yaghi, Acc. Chem.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 6000 –6003
ꢀ 2003 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
6003