Scheme 3 Reagents: i, NOBF4, CH2Cl2; ii, TTF, acetone, H2O.
(52%) and the alcohol 8 (58%), showing that the radical 19
generated under these conditions was behaving exactly as it had
in the reaction of 2.
The contrast between cyclohexyl TTF salt 18 and salt 6
indicated that a solvolysis of a secondary TTF salt could not
occur without some assistance from neighbouring groups. The
nature and extent of the assistance were now probed directly.
First, to investigate whether some special effect resulted from
the dihydrobenzofuran ring system, amine 22 was prepared and
diazotised to afford a diazonium salt analogue of 2 (Scheme 3).
This duly cyclised to form dihydrobenzothiophene 21 (52%)
and the alcohol 23 (53%). No TTF salts were detected after the
solvolysis.
Next, amine 24, lacking the electron-donating oxygen atom,
was prepared and diazotised affording 25. Surprisingly, the
compound also afforded an alcohol product, i.e. 26 (24%),
indicating that the oxygen atom is not essential for solvolysis.
In contrast, when the diazonium salt derived from 27 was
subjected to the radical-polar crossover reaction, 21 was
produced (45%) as well as the sulfur-coupled TTF salt 28
(21%). Intriguingly, this sulfur-coupled salt was stable to
solvolysis. We deduce that there is a sharp demarcation between
substrates that undergo solvolysis in acetone and those that do
not. Salt 25 features an ortho-dialkylarene and so should be
more electron-rich than the monosubstituted arene in 28; hence
it should more effectively promote neighbouring group partic-
ipation.
Scheme 4 Reagents: i, NOBF4, CH2Cl2; ii, TTF, acetone, H2O.
conditions which are totally aliphatic. Although we do not
advocate the intramolecular sulfur displacement reaction as a
synthetic route to aliphatic radicals, it allows us to determine the
properties of such systems. The development of more powerful
radical-polar crossover catalysts than TTF should lead to such
products starting from e.g. alkyl and aryl halides, thus extending
the scope of the reaction.
(ii) A TTF salt linked to a secondary carbon will undergo
solvolysis with a little assistance from the arene—the arene
needs to bear at least two alkyl functions to be sufficiently
electron-rich to trigger the solvolysis in acetone under our
conditions. This contrasts with the situation for primary carbon,
where more powerful assistance is required. (The requirement
for neighbouring group participation at a secondary carbon has
important implications for stereochemical control.)
(iii) Groups other than arenes can participate in the
solvolysis. This extends the scope of the radical-polar crossover
reaction.
The observation of neighbouring group assistance suggests
an answer to one of the key questions on the mechanism of these
reactions. Until now, solvolysis of TTF salts such as 29
(Scheme 4) was thought to involve intermediates such as the
open secondary cation 30. This cation should easily undergo
rearrangement and/or fragmentation (e.g. to products 33 and
34), but this was not observed. With neighbouring group
participation, the delocalised cation 31 can be proposed as the
true intermediate, and this involvement by the aryl ring can
decelerate rearrangements by stabilising the cation and altering
the orbital alignment from that required for rearrangement. (The
delocalised cation could also control the stereochemistry of
attack by the nucleophile water.)
The question now arose about whether groups other than an
aromatic ring could assist the solvolysis step. An immediate
answer was obtained from diazotisation of the silyl ether 35 and
subjection of the product diazonium salt to reaction with TTF
(Scheme 4). This afforded the perhydrobenzofuran 37 (23%
from amine 35) indicating that a side-chain oxygen can
participate. Dihydrobenzothiophene 21 (56% from amine 35)
was also isolated from this reaction.
Notes and references
1 J. A. Murphy, C. Lampard and N. Lewis, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1993, 295.
2 O. Callaghan, C. Lampard, A. R. Kennedy and J. A. Murphy, J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans 1, 1999, 995.
3 O. Callaghan, X. Franck and J. A. Murphy, Chem. Commun., 1997,
1923.
4 C. Lampard, J. A. Murphy, F. Rasheed, N. Lewis, M. B. Hursthouse and
D. E. Hibbs, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 8675.
5 For a review of the extensive area of solvolysis of b-arylakyl substrates,
see: J. C. Lancelot, D. J. Cram and P. von R. Schleyer, Carbonium Ions,
ed. G. A. Olah and P. v. R. Schleyer, Wiley-Interscience, 1972, vol. 3,
pp. 1347–1483.
6 J. A. Kampmeier and T. R. Evans, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1966, 88,
4096.
7 A. L. J. Beckwith and S. A. M. Duggan, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2,
1994, 1509.
8 B. A. Smart and C. H. Schiesser, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 2, 1994,
2269; C. H. Schiesser, M. L. Styles and L. M. Wild, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 2, 1996, 2257.
9 D. Crich and Q. Yao, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 3566.
10 D. Crich and X. L. Hao, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 5982.
Summarising the findings: (i) for the first time, radicals have
been produced under TTF-induced radical-polar crossover
Communication b000786m
628
Chem. Commun., 2000, 627–628