Angewandte
Research Articles
Chemie
0.5–1.5 (Figure 2a, Table 1, entries 11–13 and 15). When the
to Cu center are effective. The reactions did not proceed when
reaction was performed in the presence of Cu(OTf)2 and LiBr
with a BrÀ/Cu ratio of 2.0, the result was similar to that using
CuBr2 (Figure 2a, Table 1, entry 14 vs. entry 1).
other metal sources such as MnCl2·4H2O, FeCl3, and CoCl2
were used (Table S3). The yield of 1b also drastically
decreased when the solvent was changed from MeCN to
tetrahydrofuran or 1,2-dichloroethane (Table S4).
To gain a mechanistic insight into the role of BrÀ, the
reaction solutions were characterized by cold spray ionization
mass spectrometry (CSI-MS, positive mode). The CSI-MS
spectrum of a MeCN solution of Cu(OTf)2, bpy, and DMN-
AZADO (Cu(OTf)2/bpy/DMN-AZADO = 1:1:1) presents
a series of signals at m/z 524.2, assignable to [Cu(bpy)2(OTf)]+
(calcd 524.0, complex A) (Figure 2b,i). Thus, without BrÀ,
a CuII species coordinated by two bpy molecules was mainly
observed, with no species coordinated by DMN-AZADO.
Conversely, the CSI-MS spectrum of a MeCN solution of
Cu(OTf)2, LiBr, bpy, and DMN-AZADO (Cu(OTf)2/LiBr/
bpy/DMN-AZADO = 1:1:1:1) exhibited series of signals at
m/z 456.2 and 466.2, assignable to [Cu(bpy)2Br]+ (calcd 456.0,
complex A) and [Cu(bpy)(DMN-AZADO)Br]+ (calcd 466.0,
complex B), respectively (Figure 2b,ii). The computational
calculation indicated that the formation of [Cu(bpy)(DMN-
AZADO)Br]+ (complex B) by replacement of MeCN in
[Cu(bpy)(MeCN)Br]+ is thermodynamically favorable by
7.6 kcalmolÀ1 (Figure 2c)[53] The CSI-MS spectrum of
a MeCN solution of CuBr2, bpy, and DMN-AZADO
(CuBr2/bpy/DMN-AZADO = 1:1:1) also exhibited series of
signals at m/z 456.2 and 466.2 (Figure 2b,iii). Consequently, it
is considered that BrÀ acts as a monodentate ligand to inhibit
coordination of two bpy ligands and allow coordination of
DMN-AZADO.[53] As mentioned above, the reaction pro-
ceeded efficiently with BrÀ/Cu = 0.5–1.5, and as the BrÀ/Cu
ratio was increased further, the reaction rate decreased.
Excess BrÀ presumably inhibits the coordination of the amine
substrate, reducing the efficiency of the reaction.
The yield of 1b drastically decreased without a Cu source,
ligand, or N-oxyl (Table 2, entries 2–4 vs. entry 1). When the
reaction was performed under an Ar atmosphere, the yield of
1b was only 3%, which was below the amount of catalyst used
Table 2: Control experiments.[a]
Entry
Deviation from standard conditions
Yield [%]
1b
1c
1
2
3
4
5
6
No changes (standard conditions)
Without Cu
Without bpy
CuBr2 (10 mol%), without DMN-AZADO
Ar atmosphere
DMN-AZADO (1 mol%), 24 h
98
n.d.
11
n.d.
3
94
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
[a] Reaction conditions: 1a (0.25 mmol), Cu/bpy/DMN-AZADO (10/10/
10 mol%), MeCN (1 mL), air (open), room temperature, 2 h. Yields were
determined by GC analysis.
(10 mol%) (Table 2, entry 5). Therefore, O2 in air functioned
as the terminal oxidant in this a-oxygenation. Under the
optimized Cu(OTf)2/CuCl/bpy/DMN-AZADO reaction con-
ditions (standard conditions), the oxygenation of 1a was
completed within 2 h, affording 98% yield of 1b (Figure S2,
Table 2, entry 1). The reaction solution was dark red during
the catalytic turnover and became green when 1a was
completely converted to 1b. Even when the amount of
DMN-AZADO catalyst was reduced to 1 mol%, 1b was
obtained quantitatively after 24 h (Table 2, entry 6).
Furthermore, we found that ClÀ was more effective than
BrÀ; when ClÀ/Cu was controlled in the range 0.5–1.0 by using
Cu(OTf)2 and CuCl2, or Cu(OTf)2 and CuCl, 1b was obtained
in almost quantitative yields (Figure 2a, Table 1, entries 16,
17, and 19). The yield of 1b was more drastically decreased
when the ClÀ/Cu ratio exceeded 1.0 (Figure 2a, Table S1,
entry 18 vs. entry 10). CuI was ineffective for this oxygenation
(Table S1, entry 20). On the basis of the above-mentioned
investigations, we mainly used Cu(OTf)2/CuCl (5 mol%/
5 mol%) as the most effective copper catalyst for further
detailed investigations.
Next, various ligands were examined for the oxygenation
of 1a. The reaction proceeded effectively in the presence of
bpy, 4,4’-dimethyl-2,2’-bipyridyl (4Mebpy), 4,4’-dimethoxy-2,2’-
bipyridyl (4MeObpy), 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), and tetra-
methylethylenediamine (TMEDA) (Table S2, entries 1–5).
However, bulky 6,6’-dimethyl-2,2’-bipyridyl (6Mebpy) and
electron-deficient 4,4’-dibromo-2,2’-bipyridyl (4Brbpy) were
inferior to bpy (Table S2, entries 6 and 7). Whichever
bidentate ligand was used, 1b was selectively obtained
without formation of 1c. We also examined the effect of
monodentate ligands. 2,4,4-Trimethyl-2-oxazoline and pyri-
dine were not effective (Table S2, entries 8 and 9). 4-
Dimethylaminopyridine and 1-methylimidazole gave 1b in
79% and 70% yields, respectively (Table S2, entries 10 and
11). Therefore, it is likely that ligands that coordinate strongly
Substrate Scope for Formamide Synthesis
Under the optimized conditions, we examined the sub-
strate scope for the proposed Cu/N-oxyl-catalyzed methyl-
selective a-oxygenation of tertiary amines. It was confirmed
by NMR analyses of the isolated products or the crude
reaction mixtures (after removal of the catalysts by short
silica column) that all reactions in Table 3 occurred highly
regioselectively at the N-methyl positions. We first examined
the applicability to cyclic N-methylamines (Table 3a). Six-
membered cyclic N-methylamines, such as 1-methylpiperi-
dine and 4-methylmorpholine, were oxygenated to the
corresponding formamides in high yields (Table 3a, 1 and
2). Various six-membered cyclic N-methylamines with sub-
stituents at the 3- or 4-positions reacted efficiently to afford
the corresponding formamides in high yields (Table 3a, 3 and
4). Chloro, ketone, and amide groups were tolerated in this
oxygenation (Table 3a, 5–7). Although DMN-AZADO
showed poor catalytic activity for six-membered cyclic N-
methylamines with substituents at the 2-positions, the reac-
tion proceeded effectively with less bulky 1-Me-AZADO
(Table 3a, 8 and 9). The reaction of a five-membered N-
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 2 – 11
ꢀ 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
&&&&
These are not the final page numbers!