C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Half-lives of H/D Exchange in 10% CD3OD/CDCl3 for
Peptides (11-15) Capable of Making Intramolecular Hydrogen
Bonds
in 15 is not accelerated to the same extent as 11 may indicate that
its role as a hydrogen bond acceptor is diminished by comparison.
Both of these effects point to the presence of conformation 15b.
These simple molecules demonstrate the usefulness of hydrogen/
deuterium exchange in the assessment of hydrogen bonding.
Relative rates of H/D exchange can be correlated with the presence
of hydrogen bonds, given comparison to controls that account for
inherent steric and electronic effects. While a number of existing
techniques indicate the role of hydrogen bond donors, this is one
of only a few techniques that directly illuminates the participation
of individual hydrogen bond acceptors.13 This approach is currently
being employed in ongoing investigations of larger hydrogen
bonding molecules.
t
1/2
exchanging NH
(min)
11
11
12
13
14
14
15
15
15
BocNHCH2CONHBu
BocNHCH2CONHBu
BocNMeCH2CONHBu
BocNHCH2CONMe2
BocNHCH2CH2NHAc
BocNHCH2CH2NHAc
BocNHCH2CONHCH2CONHBu
BocNHCH2CONHCH2CONHBu
BocNHCH2CONHCH2CONHBu
40
132
150
800
570
33
63
13
180
derivatives. The exchange kinetics of Boc-Gly-NMe
2
13 (+) showed
a rate of exchange that was similar to that of the carbamate control,
suggesting that when the γ-turn was unavailable there was no
significant hydrogen bonding present in this derivative.
A comparison with other techniques indicates the sensitivity of
H/D exchange in illustrating these somewhat weak hydrogen
7
bonding interactions. Both N-H protons of 11 show significant
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by an award from
Research Corporation. The authors are grateful to the NSF for
financial support (MRI-0116416).
changes in NMR chemical shift (g2 ppm) upon the addition of a
hydrogen bonding solvent,10 making it difficult to accurately
describe the presence of hydrogen bonding. Analysis of the infrared
spectra of 11-13 does indicate the presence of a hydrogen-bonded
amide for 11 and 12, but even 12 exhibits predominantly a non-
hydrogen-bonded amide stretch.11
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic details, NMR
spectra, and kinetic data for H/D exchange. This material is available
free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
The selectivity of hydrogen bond formation is not purely
dependent on preferred ring size; it is also a matter of the functional
groups involved. Molecule 14 was designed to permit two possible
seven-membered ring hydrogen bonds 14a and 14b, each involving
an amide and a carbamate functional group. The H/D kinetics
References
(
1) For recent reviews, see: (a) Rotundi, K. S.; Gierasch, L. M. Pept. Sci
2
006, 84, 13. (b) Goodman, C. M.; Choi, S.; Shandler, S.; DeGrado, W.
F. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007, 3, 252. (c) Seebach, D.; Hook, D. F.; Gl a¨ ttli,
A. Pept. Sci. 2006, 84, 23. (d) Nowick, J. S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006,
4, 3869.
(
Table 2) exhibited the carbamate exchanging more quickly than
(2) (a) Hammond, M. C.; Bartlett, P. A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3104. (b)
Wang, D.; Chen, K.; Kulp, J. L., III; Arora, P. S., J. Am. Chem. Soc.
7
control 7, while the amide exchanged more slowly than control 2.
These results suggest a preference for the amide to be the hydrogen
bond donor and the carbamate the hydrogen bond acceptor. In
contrast to the glycine derivatives above, these H/D exchange rates
differed only slightly from controls. This could indicate a weaker
hydrogen bond, but since this molecule can adopt either conforma-
tion, the exchange kinetics likely represent the average of the
dynamic equilibrium between 14a and 14b. This equilibrium would
appear to favor conformation 14a, presumably due the difference
in the innate hydrogen bonding ability of the individual functional
groups.
2
006, 128, 9248. (c) Linton, B. R.; Reutershan, M. H.; Aderman, C. M.;
Richardson, E. A.; Brownell, K. R.; Ashley, C. W.; Evans, C. A.; Miller,
S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 1993.
(3) (a) Maier, C. S.; Deinzer, M. L. Methods Enzymol. 2005, 402, 312. (b)
Krishna, M. M. G.; Hoang, L.; Lin, Y.; Englander, S. W. Methods 2004,
34, 51. (c) Woodward, C. K. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1994, 4, 112.
(4) (a) Tang, L.; Hopper, E. D.; Tong, Y.; Sadowsky, J. D.; Peterson, K. J.;
Gellman, S. H.; Fitzgerald, M. C. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 5869. (b) Lu,
X.; Wintrode, P. L.; Serewicz, W. K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007,
1
04, 1510. (c) Sari, N.; Ruan, B.; Fisher, K. E.; Alexander, P. A.; Orban,
J.; Bryan, P. N. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 652.
(
5) Perrin, C. L.; Dwyer, T. J.; Rebek, J.; Duff, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
1
12, 3122.
(6) Bai, Y.; Milne, J. S.; Mayne, L.; Englander, S. W. Proteins: Struct., Funct.,
Genet. 1993, 17, 75.
(
(
7) Detailed data can be found in the Supporting Information.
8) H/D exchange shows a minimal rate at pH 3-5, suggesting that with no
addition of acid or base during these experiments a base-catalyzed
dissociative mechanism would predominate. See refs 3-5 as well as: (a)
Englander, S. W.; Sosnick, T. R.; Englander, J. J.; Mayne, L. Curr. Opin.
Struct. Biol. 1996, 6, 18. (b) Perrin, C. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989, 22, 268.
9) For examples of resonance-assisted hydrogen bonding, see: (a) Stevens,
E. D. Acta Crystallogr. B 1978, 34, 544. (b) Leiserowitz, L.; Tuval, M.
Acta Crystallogr. B 1978, 34, 1230. (c) Jeffrey, G. A.; Ruble, J. R.;
McMullan, R. D.; DeFrees, J. D.; Pople, J. A. Acta Crystallogr. B 1981,
(
Dipeptide Boc-Gly-Gly-NHBu 15 possesses an additional hy-
3
7, 1885.
drogen bond donor and acceptor, and hydrogen/deuterium exchange
(
(
(
(
10) (a) Pitner, T. P.; Urry, D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 1399. (b)
Venkatachalapathi, Y. V.; Prasad, B. V. V.; Balaram, P. Biochemistry
1982, 21, 5502-5509.
12
is helpful in illuminating the preferred conformations. The kinetic
7
profile showed that, once again, the butyl amide (b) exchanged
11) (a) Gellman, S. H.; Dado, G. P.; Liang, G.-B.; Adams, B. R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 1164. (b) D ´ı az, H.; Espina, J. R.; Kelly, J. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8316.
more slowly than control 2 (O) but also slightly more slowly than
the butyl amide in 11 (see Table 2). The carbamate of 15 (9)
exchanges at a rate that is much faster than control 7 (0) but not
as fast as the carbamate in 11. The central amide exchanges at a
rate slightly faster than control 2. As a whole, these three rates are
most consistent with a â-turn conformation 15a, in equilibrium with
at least one other conformation. The slight acceleration in the
exchange of the central amide suggests that it serves to some extent
as a hydrogen bond acceptor. The observation that the carbamate
12) For seminal work on the hydrogen bonding patterns of peptide turns, see:
Dado, G. P.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1054 and
related references.
13) Infrared spectroscopy has been used to probe the changes in carbonyl
stretching frequencies that accompany hydrogen bonding. (a) Compagnon,
I.; Oomens, J.; Bakker, J.; Meijer, G.; von Heldon, G. Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys. 2005, 7, 13. (b) Gerhards, M.; Gerlach, A. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
2002, 4, 5563.
JA076185S
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 129, NO. 43, 2007 12957