Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
Page 3 of 4
ChemComm
DOI: 10.1039/C5CC03419A
electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy
*81>> >8734
-!<;8B94=
+:,"0:-!-
)@!-
(SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), electron
energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) mapping, thermogravimetric
analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and
UV/vis spectroscopy. Extra compositional analysis on the sul-
phur polymer was carried out using elemental analysis and X-
Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Solution phase char-
acterisation was severely impaired by the insolubility of the
composites in most solvents (only sparingly soluble in 1,2-
dichlorobenzene).
,2-!-
The composites themselves exhibited the colour of the em-
bedded nanoparticles and retained the shape of any mould in
which they were placed before curing, realising the potential
for complex engineering components to be cast (see Fig. 1c
and d). The incorporation of nanoparticles did little to alter
the physical properties of the sulphur polymer as evidenced
by the melting behaviour recorded by TGA/DSC (see S5.6†),
and all samples exhibited thermoset polymer characteristics.
SEM micrographs supported this observation with the poly-
mer shown to have sharp, glass-like features, with no observ-
able difference in external structure or integrity with incorpo-
rated nanomaterials (see section S5.2†).
%(#
&##
&$#
&%#
&'#
&(#
'##
/1A484:5?6/0:9
0,2-!-
TEM was used to image the nanomaterials in the polymer,
although this was challenging due to the insolubility of the
composites for sample preparation and the high electron den-
sity of the sulphur polymer (relative to a conventional, or-
ganic polymer). This was overcome by partially dissolving
the composite in 1,2-dichlorobenzene overnight, effectively
giving cross-sections of the composite. TEM micrographs are
shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 3 Top: UV/visible spectra of various nanoparticle containing
The PbS nanoparticles grew in size when incorporated into
the composite. The diameter increased from 3.6 0.5 nm in
the as synthesised17 sample to 36 9 nm in the composite.
The shape of the nanoparticles also changed from spherical
to cubic, the latter consistent with the cubic halite structure
of PbS (galena - see Fig. S5.3.4†). EDS mapping (Fig. 2f-
h) clearly indicated the presence of sulphur and lead with the
lead localised to the nanoparticles and the sulphur distributed
throughout, indicating a full sulphur-polymer coat.
S-polymer films. Bottom: Image of films produced.
sorption spectroscopy of composite thin films, with the pre-
viously stated amount of nanoparticles (∼ 0.1 g) causing an
observable difference in absorption.
The band-edge of the PbS parent nanocrystals was not
observable in the PbS-sulphur polymer composite, presum-
ably due to temperature induced agglomeration destroying the
quantum dot properties. Absorption spectra of PbS nanocrys-
tals and composite in the infrared range are given in Figure
S5.7.3†. The gold nanoparticle-sulphur polymer composite
does show the surface plasmon resonance band of the gold, al-
beit blue-shifted compared to the parent material dispersed in
toluene (Figure S5.7.1†). This is again consistent with ripen-
ing as confirmed by TEM images, with a size increase from
4.7 nm 1.2 nm to 22.3 nm 19.2 nm, although smaller par-
ticles of near original size do remain (Figure S5.3.2†).18 The
band-edge of the InP/ZnS quantum dots (455 nm in n-hexane)
used was not detectable in the UV/vis spectrum due to high
absorption of light by the sulphur polymer matrix in that re-
The EDS spectra of the other nanoparticle composites can
be found in section S5.4† where the elemental compositions
are confirmed. The most interesting sample is that containing
the InP/ZnS as the quantum dots are visible by TEM. EELS
mapping of sulphur and iron (Fig. 2b-d) in the Fe3O4-sulphur
polymer composite demonstrated the presence of unaltered
spherical iron oxide nanoparticles within the polymer, with
the iron and sulphur glowing white in respective micrographs.
TEM images of other nanoparticle-sulphur polymer compos-
ites can be found in section S5.3†.
On visible inspection, it was clear that the incorporated
nanoparticles had altered the optical absorption properties of
the material (Fig. 3). This was evaluated by the UV/vis ab-
1–4 | 3