(75–80 1C) approximately 40 1C higher than that observed for
enzyme-mediated FMOC-Tyr hydrogels.5d Entrapment of the
cerium oxide nanoparticles within the gel network could also
contribute towards the increased stiffness and viscosity.
Finally, the use of cerium oxide and other inorganic
nanoparticles9 in the catalytic dephosphorylation of bio-
logically active amino acids and peptides could have general
relevance in developing supramolecular hydrogels with hybrid
structures and functions. In this regard, we note that several
recent studies have demonstrated promising biomedical appli-
cations based on cerium oxide nanoparticles,12 suggesting that
embedding inorganic nano-catalysts of this type within small-
biomolecule hydrogels could represent an important step
towards novel forms of soft, bioactive materials.
Fig. 3 Cross-polarized optical microscopy images of hydrogels
prepared by cerium oxide nanoparticle-mediated dephosphorylation
of FMOC-Tyr-P at concentrations of 50 mM (a) and 25 mM (b),
showing the presence of Maltese cross patterns (spherulites) or nematic
birefringence, respectively. Scale bar = 100 mm.
The authors thank the University of Bristol, UK for
financial support, Dr Andrew Collins, Jonathan A. Jones,
Judith Mantell (Wolfson Bioimaging Facility, University of
Bristol), Prof. Tony Miles and Dr Phil Pollintine (University
of Bath) for assistance with AFM, HRTEM, ESEM and
rheology measurements respectively.
microscopy (ESEM) micrographs, which indicated that the
Maltese cross structures corresponded to discrete spheroidal
100–120 mm-sized particle-like domains (Fig. S10b, ESIw).
Although the differences in texture were attributed primarily to
changes in FMOC-Tyr-P concentration, the possibility that nuclea-
tion of the FMOC-Tyr nanofilaments occurred specifically on the
surface of the cerium oxide nanoparticles could not be ruled out.
In summary, we have shown that cerium oxide nanoparticles
are capable of alkaline phosphatase-like activity, with the
consequence that viscoelastic, amino acid-based supramole-
cular hydrogels comprising an entangled network of helical
ribbon-like nanofilaments and inorganic nanoparticles can be
produced by abiogenic catalysis-mediated self-assembly. The
nanoparticle-containing FMOC-Tyr hydrogels were responsive
to external stimuli such as temperature or mechanical forces,
with the consequence that they could be reversibly assembled
and disassembled by melting or shear thinning of the supra-
molecular structure. The catalytic dephosphorylation behaviour
of the cerium oxide nanoparticles was attributed to the Lewis
acidity associated with Ce3+/Ce4+ surface sites that are capable
of not only coordinating phosphoryl oxygens but also reducing
the activation energy of P–O bond scission by facilitating
nucleophilic attack from neighbouring surface-bound hydroxyl
groups.9 Although mechanistically different, the results indicate
that cerium oxide nanoparticles can be used as plausible mimics
of enzymatic transformations involving peptide dephosphoryla-
tion and coupled supramolecular self-assembly.6 However, we
noted several differences between the physical properties of
the nanoparticle-containing hydrogels and their FMOC-Tyr
counterparts prepared by enzyme-mediated self-assembly under
comparable conditions. For example, use of the cerium oxide
nanoparticle catalyst (0.3 g mLꢀ1) produced hydrogels from
FMOC-Tyr-P concentrations as low as 8.3 mM (Fig. S2, ESIw),
while a limiting amino acid concentration of ca. 50 mM was
required in the presence of alkaline phosphatase. Moreover,
alkaline phosphatase-mediated hydrogels were softer, less viscous,
and displayed a considerable degree of structural deformation
at much lower shear stress values (10 Pa),5d compared with
hydrogels prepared in the presence of cerium oxide nano-
particles. The increase in mechanical strength was attributed
primarily to the nanoparticle-mediated self-assembly of a semi-
rigid matrix of supramolecular filaments, which become
entangled to produce a robust hydrogel comprising spherulitic/
nematic domains, and exhibiting a gel–sol transition temperature
Notes and references
1 (a) S. Mann, Nat. Mater., 2009, 8, 781; (b) S. Stupp, Chem. Rev.,
2005, 105, 1023.
2 R. V. Ulijn and D. N. Woolfson, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 3349.
3 (a) J. B. Matson and S. I. Stupp, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 26;
(b) M. Zezler and R. V. Ulijn, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 3351.
4 (a) R. V. Ulijn, J. Mater. Chem., 2006, 16, 2217; (b) Z. Yang, G. Liang
and B. Xu, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 315; (c) M. E. Hahn and
N. C. Gianneschi, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 11814; (d) D. J. Adams,
Macromol. Biosci., 2011, 11, 160; (e) J. Dash, A. J. Patil, R. N. Das,
F. L. Dowdall and S. Mann, Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 8120.
5 (a) Z. Yang, H. Gu, D. Fu, P. Gao, J. K. Lam and B. Xu, Adv.
Mater., 2004, 16, 1440; (b) S. Toledano, R. J. Williams,
V. Jayawarna and R. V. Uljin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006,
128, 1070; (c) A. K. Das, R. Collins and R. V. Ulijn, Small,
2008, 4, 279; (d) R. Krishna Kumar, X. Yu, A. J. Patil, M. Li and
S. Mann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 9343.
6 (a) T. Vermonden, R. Censi and W. E. Hennink, Chem. Rev., 2012,
DOI: 10.1021/cr200157d; (b) K. Y. Lee and D. J. Mooney, Chem.
Rev., 2001, 101, 1869.
7 Z. A. C. Schnepp, R. Gonzalez-McQuire and S. Mann, Adv.
Mater., 2006, 18, 1869.
8 (a) L. Gao, J. Zhuang, L. Nie, J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, N. Gu, T. Wang,
J. Feng, D. Yang, S. Perrett and X. Yan, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2007,
2, 577; (b) Z. Dai, S. Liu, J. Bao and H. Ju, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009,
15, 4321; (c) W. He, Y. Liu, J. Yuan, J. J. Yin, X. Wu, X. Hu,
K. Zhang, J. Liu, C. Chen, Y. Ji and Y. Guo, Biomaterials, 2011,
32, 1139; (d) Y. Jv, B. Li and R. Cao, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 8017;
(e) R. Andre, F. Natalio, M. Humanes, J. Leppin, K. Heinze,
R. Wever, H. C. Schroder, W. E. G. Muller and W. Tremel, Adv.
Funct. Mater., 2010, 21, 501; (f) W. Shi, X. Zhang, S. He and
Y. Huang, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 10785; (g) J. Mu, Y. Wang,
M. Zhao and L. Zhang, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 2540.
9 (a) F. Tan, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, J. Wei, Y. Cai and X. Qian, J. Mass
Spectrom., 2008, 43, 628; (b) M. H. Kuchma, C. B. Komanski,
J. Colon, A. Teblum, A. E. Masunov, B. Alvarado, S. Babu,
S. Seal, J. Summy and C. H. Baker, Nanomed.: Nanotechnol., Biol.
Med., 2010, 6, 738; (c) G. Cheng, J.-L. Zhang, Y.-L. Liu,
D.-H. Sun and J.-Z. Ni, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 5732;
(d) N. W. Luedtke and A. Schpartz, Chem. Commun., 2005, 5426.
10 A. Aggeli, M. Bell, L. M. Carric, C. W. G. Fishwick, R. Harding,
P. J. Mawer, S. E. Radford, A. E. Strong and N. Boden, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 9619.
11 M. R. H. Krebs, C. E. MacPhee, A. F. Miller, I. E. Dunlop,
C. M. Dobson and A. M. Donald, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.,
2004, 101, 14420.
12 I. Cleardo, J. Z. Pedersen, E. Traversa and L. Ghibelli, Nanoscale,
2011, 3, 1411.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun.