was no example of intermolecular ether exchange by the
Nicholas reaction. In this paper, we report the DCC of the
Nicholas ether-exchange reaction and the synthesis of crown
ether as an application of this reaction.5
Table 1. Etherification by the Nicholas Ether-Exchange
Reaction
To study the equilibrium nature of the Nicholas ether-
exchange reaction, a mixture of two alkyne complexes (1a
and 1b) was treated with trifluoromethanesulfonic acid
(TfOH) (Scheme 2). After the oxidative treatment of the
Scheme 2. Nicholas Ether-Exchange Reaction
yield/%
run
1
E
acida
concn/M additiveb
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
a
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
TfOH
TfOH
TfOH
TFA
MsOH
TMSOTf
Et2AlCl
ZnCl2
AgOTf
BF3OEt2
TfOH
TfOH
TfOH
TfOH
TfOH
TfOH
TfOH
TfOH
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
1
none
34
47
40
0
21
21
19
0
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
c
MS4A
MS5A
MS5A
MS4A
MS4A
MS4A
MS4A
MS4A
MS4A
none
none
none
none
MS3A
MS4A
trace trace
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
1
10
33
9
0
10
11
37
34
0
mixture with cerium(IV) diammonium nitrate (CAN) to
remove the cobalt carbonyl moiety,6 the products were
isolated. Along with 3 that was formed from 1b, the ether-
exchange product 2a was obtained. Therefore, the ether-
exchange reaction between reactants 1a and 1b occurred
under the Nicholas reaction condition. When the reaction
was carried out for 24 h, the asymmetrical ether (2a) was
isolated with 42% yield. Since the theoretical yield of 2a at
equilibrium is 50%, this indicates that the Nicholas ether-
exchange reaction is reversible and can be used for DCC.
Given that the Nicholas ether-exchange reaction is revers-
ible, quantitative etherification is possible when the byproduct
of the ether-exchange reaction is removed from the reaction
system. Thus, the reaction of 1 with 2 equiv of alcohol 4
was carried out in CH2Cl2 at room temperature for 24 h to
investigate the effect of the leaving groups (X and E) in the
ether-exchange reaction (Table 1). The monosubstituted
product 2 and the bis-substituted product 3 were isolated after
CAN treatment. When the reaction was carried out with
reactant 1a in the presence of molecular sieves as the
methanol absorbent, the yield of ether slightly improved (runs
1-3). This result prompted examination of various acid
catalysts for etherification (runs 4-10). Although TMSOTf
and BF3OEt2 were as effective as TfOH, a better acid catalyst
than TfOH was not found. Therefore, the effect of the leaving
group in 1 (X) was examined (runs 11-14). When 1d (X )
OTs) and 1e (X ) Cl) were used, 2 was not observed,
although the yield of desired ether 3 was low. When 1f (X
) OH) was used, the yield of 3 drastically increased, and
12 dc
13 ec
0
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
f
f
f
f
f
f
c
g
c
g
f
trace 52
62
trace 62
8
MgSO4 37
16
7
CaCl2
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
4
TMS
TMS
TMS
TMS
TMS
TMSOTf
TMSOTf
TMSOTf
TMSOTf
TMSOTf
trace 74
41
0
33
0
ND
ND
31
69
30
83
49
17
1
0.01
0.01
TBDMS TMSOTf
TBDMS TMSOTf
g
a 20 mol % for 1. b 500 mg for 0.25 mmol of 1. c Cobalt complex was
prepared in situ and used without purification.
only a trace of 2f was observed. Since the deactivation of
TfOH by the produced water was of concern, the addition
of dehydrating material was examined (runs 15-18). While
molecular sieves only slightly increased the yield of 3,
MgSO4 or CaCl2 prevented the etherification reaction. When
TMS ether was used instead of alcohol in the presence of
TMSOTf, 3 was obtained in good yield (run 19).7 The best
result was obtained when the reaction was carried out with
1g (X ) OTMS) at a high concentration condition (run 23).
The TBDMS ether was not effective (runs 24 and 25). Thus,
etherification was effectively carried out when siloxane was
the counterpart of the ether.
Since DCC is particularly effective for the construction
of macrocycles, the synthesis of crown ether 6 was inves-
(5) Trityl ether has also been used for DCC: (a) Harrison, I. T. J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1972, 231–232. (b) Furusho, Y.; Oku, T.; Rajkumar,
G. A.; Takata, T. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 52–53.
(7) Yokozawa, T.; Nishimori, M.; Endo, T. Macromol. Chem. Phys.
1996, 197, 1361–1371.
(6) Seyferth, D.; Wehman, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 5520.
1314
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 6, 2009