ORAC Assay for Lipophilic Antioxidants
J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 50, No. 7, 2002 1819
effect on the phenol group derived from the long (C16H31)
aliphatic tail of R-tocopherol, an electron-donating group, may
be the cause of the lower ORAC value. A remotely related
analogue is that the higher alkanoic acid has lower acidity than
that of acetic acid, because the alkyl groups manifest a small
but significant electron donation to the carboxyl carbon (8). We
further measured the ORAC value for R-tocopherol acetate, a
popular ingredient in vitamin E supplements. Our result
indicated that R-tocopherol acetate does not possess any
antioxidant capacity under current experimental conditions. This
result provides additional evidence to support our conclusion
that the phenol group is an essential group for radical trapping
antioxidant activity.
Mechanistic Studies on the Vitamin E Antioxidants. We
examined the oxidized products of R-tocopherol and Trolox with
AAPH by LC/MS and identified two oxidized products for each
compound. Figure 5a,b shows the oxidation profiles for Trolox
and R-tocopherol induced by AAPH obtained by HPLC,
respectively. Figure 8 illustrates the proposed reaction mech-
anisms for Trolox and R-tocopherol in the presence of AAPH.
As shown, the reaction was initiated by the formation of
phenoxyl radical I due to a hydrogen atom being abstracted
from the phenol group by the peroxyl radical. Phenoxyl radical
I can further undergo intramolecular arrangement to form
intermediate II, a tertiary carbyl radical. In the presence of O2,
intermediate II is peroxidized to yield intermediate III, a peroxyl
radical that may abstract a hydrogen from the water molecule
to yield product 2 and a highly reactive hydroxyl radical (HO•).
Meanwhile, the intermediate II can couple with the generated
HO• to produce product 1.
Structure-Activity Relationship. Table 3 summarizes the
ORAC values for some common lipophilic antioxidants. The
ORAC values for the three tocopherols are significantly
different. The ORAC values of R-, γ-, and δ-tocopherol are
0.50, 0.74, and 1.36, respectively. The difference in ORAC value
can be attributed to the steric effect of the ortho methyl groups.
The number of methyl groups ortho to the phenol group of
tocopherol decreases from two (R), one (γ), and zero (δ). A
similar trend was observed for 2-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (0.41
( 0.01) and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) (0.16 (
0.01). Apparently, the steric factor has a significant impact on
the antioxidant activity; the less steric hindrance results in higher
ORAC values. Our findings, however, are in contrast with the
theoretical calculations by Wright and co-workers who calcu-
lated the O-H bond dissociation energies (BDE) for R- (75.78
kcal/mol), γ- (79.57 kcal/mol), and δ-tocopherol (81.43 kcal/
mol) (9). On the basis of the BDE, they suggested that
R-tocopherol has the highest antioxidant activity among the
three. In fact, the ORAC value is a kinetic parameter while BDE
relates to thermodynamics of a reaction. Therefore, BDE and
ORAC values may not necessarily have the same trend. From
our results, steric hindrance plays a significant negative role in
antioxidant activity. γ-Oryzanol was found to possess a much
higher ORAC value than that of any vitamin E antioxidant. In
support of our result, a recent study by Godber and co-worker
found that γ-oryzanol has a much higher antioxidant activity
than tocopherols in protecting a cholesterol oxidation system
accelerated by AAPH (10). The significantly greater ORAC
value of γ-oryzanol can be attributed to the electronic contribu-
tion of an ortho methoxyl group and the larger π-conjugation
system, involving 11 atoms, as compared to vitamin E with only
8 such atoms. A recent report of Mulder and co-workers on
coenzyme Q10H2 reveals that the hydrogen atom abstraction is
surprisingly easy from intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded meth-
Figure 8. Proposed oxidation mechanism for Trolox and R-tocopherol in
the presence of AAPH.
assay for lipophilic antioxidants. As demonstrated in the
following sections, RMCD was determined to be an ideal
solubility enhancer for the studied antioxidants, and for the first
time, the antioxidant values for tocopherols, tocotrienols, and
other common lipophilic antioxidants were obtained using the
ORAC assay.
Effect of RMCD Concentration on the Solubility of
Vitamin E in Aqueous Solution. Figure 6 shows the net AUC
of 50 µM R-tocopherol at different RMCD concentrations (w/
v) in 75 mM phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.4). The net AUC
of R-tocopherol increases with the increase of RMCD concen-
tration and reaches a plateau after 4% RMCD. The plateau
indicates that R-tocopherol is completely soluble in 75 mM
phosphate buffer solution. This conclusion was further con-
firmed by the HPLC studies (data not shown). Taking into
account the concentration variations, 7% RMCD in 50% acetone
solution was chosen for sample preparation.
Effect of RMCD on the ORAC Value of Trolox. Lipophilic
antioxidants, such as the vitamin E family and oryzanol, consist
of a long aliphatic tail (g16 carbons) and a hydrophilic phenol
group on the head. The tail can fit into a CD cavity allowing
the hydrophilic phenol group to remain in aqueous solution.
Therefore, the reactivity of the headgroup is not inhibited by
CD complexation. RMCD itself consists of hydroxyl and
methoxyl functional groups and is doughnut-shaped with an
open moiety; therefore, RMCD does not possess any antioxidant
activity nor does it prevent the complexed antioxidant molecule
from functioning as antioxidant. To confirm this, the ORAC
values of Trolox were examined in the presence (or absence)
of 7% RMCD. Figure 7 shows the linear curves of the net AUC
against the Trolox concentrations in phosphate buffer and 7%
RMCD solution, respectively. It becomes obvious that the two
curves are almost superimposed, suggesting that RMCD is inert
in the ORAC assay.
Difference in ORAC Value between R-Tocopherol and
Trolox. Because of the structural similarity, Trolox is expected
to possess a similar ORAC value to that of R-tocopherol.
However, our results reveal that the ORAC value of R-toco-
pherol is about 50% less than that of Trolox. The difference in
ORAC value prompted us to investigate the reaction kinetics
and mechanisms of Trolox/R-tocopherol with AAPH. Figure
4 shows the competitive reaction kinetic curves between Trolox
and R-tocopherol in the presence of AAPH. As shown, the rate
of Trolox with AAPH tends to be much faster than that of
R-tocopherol with AAPH. This observation is in agreement with
their ORAC values. At this point, we suggest that the inductive