known ability of the tartrate control element to effectively
influence stereoselection in the allylmetalation reaction.7 We
have found that under appropriate conditions, (Z)-selective
1,4-addition across 1,3-dienes occurs. Subsequently, we
surveyed the ability of the resulting bis-boronates to engage
in stereoselective allylmetalation reactions. The resulting
allylation product may be manipulated in situ, and the one-
pot process from diene to product is the subject of this report.
The majority of diboration reactions described in the
literature are catalyzed by phosphine-containing platinum-
(0) metal centers. The proposed mechanism for the diboration
of 1,3-dienes involves initial oxidative addition of the
diborane to furnish a square-planar L2PtB2 intermediate.2b,8
Since dissociation of a phosphine ligand from the L2PtB2
center is required for coordination of the reacting diene, we
expected that a platinum catalyst with a monodentate phos-
phine would be most active. Addition of 1 to 2,3-dimeth-
ylbutadiene was examined with the readily available complex
Pt(dba)2 (Scheme 2).9 Reactions were carried out in C6D6 at
product was obtained cleanly after oxidative workup (Scheme
3). The corresponding 1,3-diol that contains a quaternary
Scheme 3
carbon stereocenter was isolated in 72% yield and >19:1
syn:anti diastereoselection with the syn isomer being formed
in 74% enantiomeric ratio.
In an effort to improve the reaction selectivity, the effect
of tartrate structure on enantioselection was investigated
(Table 1). Though a linear correlation between selectivity
Table 1. Catalytic Diboration/Allylation with Chiral
Diboronatesa
Scheme 2
entry
tartrate (R)
% yield
% ee
1
2
3
4
Me
Et
i-Pr
CH(i-Pr)2
21
68
38
17
72
74
58
60
1
room temperature and followed by in situ H NMR spec-
troscopy. While diene diboration did not proceed well at
room temperature in the absence of ligand or in the presence
of triphenylphosphine (<10% conversion), addition of 1
equiv of tricyclohexylphosphine relative to platinum resulted
in >95% conversion to the diboration adduct after 14 h.
Notably, the reaction with PCy3 provided the required high
levels of stereocontrol furnishing a >20:1 Z:E ratio of
stereoisomers.10
Since tartrate boronate esters suffer hydrolytic cleavage
in the presence of water, the diboration adducts were em-
ployed without isolation. The benzene solution obtained from
the stereoselective diboration was therefore diluted with 3
parts toluene, and 4 Å powdered molecular sieves were
added. Upon dropwise addition of a cyclohexane carboxal-
dehyde solution at -78 °C, the corresponding allylation
a Step 1: 1 equiv of diene, 1 equiv of diboronate, benzene, rt, 12 h.
Step 2: toluene, 4 Å mol sieves, 1 equiv of RCHO -78 °C, 3 h. Step 3:
50 °C, 3 h. For all reactions, syn:anti > 19:1.
and steric encumbrance is not observed, a steric component
is obvious. The sterically less bulky dimethyl tartrate-derived
boronate provides enantioselection on the order of that seen
for diethyl tartrate. However, increasing the size of the R
group to isopropyl or 2,4-dimethylpentyl (entries 3 and 4)
leads to a decrease in the enantiomeric ratio and the reaction
yield.11 Reaction with tartrate amides and with amino
alcohol-derived diboranes failed in the initial diboration
reaction (data not shown).
Examination of a series of substrates suggests that the cis-
diboration adduct leads to exclusive formation of the syn
allylation adduct (>19:1 syn/anti ratio in all cases, Table
2). Yields are good to excellent for the three-step procedure
regardless of substrate structure, although the enantiomeric
ratio is strongly substrate dependent. Aliphatic aldehydes
provide the highest enantioselectivities (entries 1-3 and 6),
whereas aromatic and R,â-unsaturated aldehydes provide
(6) Commerically available from Aldrich Chemical Co.
(7) (a) Roush, W. R.; Walts, A. E.; Hoong, L. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1985, 107, 8186. (b) Roush, W. R.; Ando, K.; Powers, D. B.; Palkowitz,
A. D.; Halterman, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6339. (c) Roush, W.
R.; Hoong, L. K.; Palmer, M.; Park, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4109.
(8) For investigations on the mechanism of alkyne diboration, see:
Iverson, C. N.; Smith, M. R. Organometallics 1996, 15, 5155.
(9) Cherwinski, W. J.; Johnson B.; Lewis, J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1974, 1405.
(10) For the ability of basic monophosphines to promote alkyne
diboration, see: Thomas, R. L.; Souza, F.; Marder, T. B. J. Chem. Soc.,
Dalton Trans. 2001, 1650.
(11) Beneficial effect of larger tartrate substituents in allylation reac-
tions: Hara, S.; Yamamoto, Y.; Fujita, A.; Suzuki, A. Synlett 1994, 639.
2574
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 14, 2003