V. Anuradha et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 4933–4935
4935
was found to be less with Ni(NO ) Æ6H O. Moreover,
the use of nickel(II) nitrate as a nitrating agent for phe-
nols is unprecedented.
2. Vogel’s Text Book of Practical Organic Chemistry,
th ed.; Longman Group UK Harlow, UK, 1989.
3
2
2
5
3
. Chemistry of Waste Minimisation; Clark, J. H., Ed.;
Chapman and Hall: London, 1995.
4
. (a) Braddock, C. Green Chem. 2001, 3, G26–G32; (b)
Tasneem, Ali M. M.; Rajanna, K. C.; Saiparakash, P. K.
Synth. Commun. 2001, 31, 1123–1127; (c) Thompson, M.
J.; Zeegers, P. J. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 8787–8790; (d)
Joshi, A. V.; Baidossi, M.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Sasson, Y.
Org. Proc. Res. Dev. 2003, 7, 95–97; (e) Kamal, A.;
Kumar, A. B.; Arifudin, M.; Patrick, M. Ultrason.
Sonochem. 2004, 11, 455–457.
The use of a sulfonic acid is precedented in the form of
trifluoromethanesulfonic acid and its derivatives1 but
the use of p-toluenesulfonic acid in the nitration of
phenols has not been reported previously. p-Toluene-
sulfonic acid enjoys other advantages over triflic acid
because it is non-corrosive and much cheaper.
2
5
6
7
. (a) Geletii, Y. V.; Bailey, A. J.; Cowan, J. J.; Weinstock, I.
A.; Hill, C. L. Can. J. Chem. 2001, 79, 792–794; (b)
Nonoyama, N.; Chiba, K.; Hisatome, K.; Suzuki, H.;
Shintani, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 6933–6937; (c)
Ramezanian, M. S.; Padmaja, S.; Koppenol, W. H. Chem.
Res. Toxicol. 1996, 9, 232–240.
. (a) Zolfigol, M. A.; Bagherzadeh, M.; Madrakian, E.;
Ghaemi, E.; Taqian-Nasab, A. J. Chem. Res. (S) 2001, 4,
140–142; (b) Iranpoor, N.; Firouzabadi, H.; Heydari, R.
Synth. Commun. 1999, 29, 3295–3302; (c) Suzuki, H.;
Yonezawa, S.; Nonoyama, N.; Mori, T. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin. Trans. 1 1996, 2385–2389.
Phenol was treated with a metal nitrate and p-TSA in
acetone either at room temperature or at reflux to afford
o-nitrophenol as the exclusive product in satisfactory to
good yields (Scheme 1).
The scope and generality of the method is illustrated
with several examples in Table 2. A variety of phenols
were subjected to the standardized conditions of Scheme
1
and all of them yielded the o-nitro product exclusively
in good to excellent yields.
. (a) Dove, M. F. A.; Manz, B.; Montgomery, J.; Pattenden,
G.; Wood, S. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998,
Phenols with electron donating groups (entries 3, 4, 5,
and 10, Table 2) behaved very well to afford the o-nitro-
phenols as the exclusive products in excellent isolated
yields. Phenols with moderately deactivating groups (en-
tries 6, 7, and 9) also yielded the o-nitrophenols in good
yields. A phenol with both an activating and a deactivat-
ing group (entry 8) also reacted to afford the desired
product in good yield.
1
589–1590; (b) Firouzabadi, H.; Iranpoor, N.; Zolfigol,
M. A. Synth. Commun. 1997, 27, 3301–3311; (c)
Iranpoor, N.; Firouzabadi, H.; Zolfigol, M. A. Synth.
Commun. 1998, 28, 2773–2781; (d) Gu, S.; Jing, H.;
Wu, J.; Liang, Y. Synth. Commun. 1997, 27, 2793–
2797; (e) Rajagopal, R.; Srinivasan, K. V. Synth. Commun.
2003, 33, 961–966; (f) Zolfigol, M. A.; Ghaemi, E.;
Madrakian, E. Molecules 2001, 6, 614–620; (g) Gigante,
B.; Prazeres, A. O.; Marcelo-Curto, M. J.; Cornelis, A.;
Laszlo, P. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 3445–3447, and
references cited therein; (h) Cornelis, A.; Laszlo, P.;
Pennetreau, P. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4771–4772; (i)
Samajdar, S.; Becker, F. F.; Banik, B. K. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 8017–8020; (j) Castedo, L.; Borges, J. E.;
Marcos, C. F.; Tojo, G. Synth. Commun. 1995, 25, 1717–
Bakuchiol (entry 11), a phenolic natural product also
yielded the o-nitrophenol as the exclusive product in
excellent isolated yield. Phenols with strong deactiving
groups failed to react under the given protocol.
In conclusion, the mono-nitration of phenols with a
metal nitrate and p-TSA has been achieved with high
regiospecificity and with excellent isolated yields. In
general, exclusive ortho-selectivity was observed for all
the phenols subjected to this protocol.
1
727.
8. (a) Grenier, J. L.; Catteau, J. P.; Cottelle, P. Synth.
Commun. 1999, 29, 1201–1208; (b) Sathunuru, R.; Rao, U.
N.; Biehl, E. ARKIVOC 2003, 124–133.
9
. Kenneth, K. L.; Volker, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 35–
0.
4
The high regiospecificity, with excellent isolated yields
and the use of inexpensive and easily accessible p-TSA
as the catalyst makes this methodology of wide synthetic
and commercial utility.
1
0. Typical Experimental Procedure: To a stirred solution of
the phenol (1 mmol) in acetone (15 ml) was added
nickel(II) nitrate (1 mmol) followed by a catalytic amount
of p-TSA (0.012 mmol) and the reaction mixture was
either refluxed or stirred at room temperature until all the
phenol was consumed. Acetone was removed under
vacuum and the crude mass was partitioned between
dichloromethane and water. The combined organic layers
were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concen-
trated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by
silica gel column chromatography using hexane and ethyl
acetate (98:2) as eluent.
Acknowledgments
V.A. thanks Dr. J. S. Yadav, Director, IICT Hyderabad
for providing financial support and encouragement.
References and notes
11. Sun, H. B.; Hua, R.; Yin, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 9071–
073.
9
1
. Olah, G. A.; Malhotra, R.; Narang, S. C. Nitration,
Methods and Mechanism; VCH: New York, 1989.
12. Coon, C. L.; Blucher, W. G.; Hill, M. E. J. Org. Chem.
1973, 38, 4243–4248.