Communication
Dalton Transactions
to determine the nature of the metal species participating in
the catalytic cycle are being carried out.
Conflicts of interest
Scheme 3 Complexes A and B reported by Keith, Chianese et al.
There are no conflicts to declare.
corresponding to the CO ligand and the C2–NHC carbon as
doublets at 216.1 (JCP = 10 Hz) and 191.3 (JCP = 7 Hz) ppm,
respectively. Finally, the coordination of PPh3 is manifested in
the 31P{1H} NMR experiment by the appearance of a singlet at
50.5 ppm. Complex 8 can be regarded as derived from 6 by the
formal loss of a H2 molecule.
Acknowledgements
Financial support (FEDER contribution) from the Spanish
Ministry of Science and Innovation (CTQ2016-80814-R) and
Junta de Andalucía (PY18-3208), and the use of computational
facilities of the Supercomputing Center of Galicia (CESGA) are
gratefully acknowledged. We thank support of the publication
fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative
through its Unit of Information Resources for Research
(URICI).
It is worth noting that imine Ru(0) complexes structurally
related to 8 have been recently reported by Keith, Chianese
et al. (Scheme 3).14 These derivatives (such as A), which were
shown to be highly active ester hydrogenation catalysts, were
isolated from the reactions with base of Ru–PNN and –CNN
complexes bearing dialkylamino side donors. Moreover, hydro-
gen activation by A led to the formation of a Ru dihydride
complex (B) in which the imine ligand fragment was hydrogen-
ated to amine. Interestingly, solutions of the Ru(0) derivative 8
were active in the hydrogenation of N-heterocycles.14,15 Thus,
THF-d8 solutions containing this complex were able to hydro-
genate (3 bar H2) 2-methylquinoxaline (10 equiv.) at 60 °C,
being 8 the only detectable metal species during the catalytic
reaction and suggesting that this is the catalyst resting state
(ESI†). Similarly, addition of 2-methylquinoxaline (10 equiv.)
to a THF-d8 solution of a 1 : 1 mixture of 6 and 7 produced the
instantaneous formation of 8. Subsequent pressurization with
H2 (3 bar) and heating to 65 °C the resulting solution brought
about the hydrogenation of the N-heteroarene (ESI†).
Notes and references
1 B. Zhao, Z. Han and K. Ding, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013,
52, 4744.
2 J. R. Khusnutdinova and D. Milstein, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2015, 54, 12236.
3 D. Milstein, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A, 2015, 373, 20140189.
4 A. Suárez, Phys. Sci. Rev., 2018, 3, 20170028.
5 R. H. Crabtree, Chem. Rev., 2017, 117, 9228.
6 E. Fogler, J. A. Garg, P. Hu, G. Leitus, L. J. W. Shimon and
D. Milstein, Chem. – Eur. J., 2014, 20, 15727; S. Kar,
M. Rauch, A. Kumar, G. Leitus, Y. Ben-David and
D. Milstein, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 5511.
In an attempt to determine the likely formation of dihy-
dride species similar to B, a THF-d8 solution of complex 8 was
pressurized with H2 (4 bar) and analyzed by NMR spec-
troscopy. Contrary to previously observed in the reaction of A
with H2,14 the 1H NMR spectrum of this solution did not
reveal changes in the temperature range between −80 and
55 °C. DFT calculations (B3LYP-D3, 6-31 g(d,p)/SDD) showed
that hydrogen activation by 8 to yield a dihydride Ru complex
analogous to B is endergonic by 9.5 kcal mol−1 (ESI†).
Moreover, H/D exchange upon exposure to D2 (3 bar) of an
in situ generated solution of 8 did not occur even after pro-
longed (72 h) heating to 65 °C. However, in the latter experi-
ment, formation of HD was observed, what can be ascribed to
the generation of deuteride species (Ru-D) under the NMR
detection limit that react with tBuOH resulting from the depro-
tonation of 3a with KOtBu (ESI†).
In conclusion, ruthenium complexes 3 incorporating CNN
(H) pincer ligands are efficient catalyst precursors in the hydro-
genation of N-heteroarenes and in the acceptorless dehydro-
genation of N-heterocycles. Although complexes 3 contain two
potential sites for metal–ligand cooperation, reaction of 3a
with base ultimately furnishes the Ru(0) complex 8, whose for-
mation is observed under catalytic conditions. Further studies
7 P. Hu, E. Fogler, Y. Diskin-Posner, M. A. Iron and
D. Milstein, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 6859; A. Kumar,
T. Janes, N. A. Espinosa-Jalapa and D. Milstein, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 7453.
8 C. Hou, J. Jiang, Y. Li, C. Zhao and Z. Ke, ACS Catal., 2017,
7, 786.
9 Z. X. Giustra, J. S. Ishibashi and S. Y. Liu, Coord. Chem.
Rev., 2016, 314, 134; R. H. Crabtree, ACS Sustainable Chem.
Eng., 2017, 5, 4491.
10 S. Chakraborty, W. W. Brennessel and W. D. Jones, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 8564; R. Xu, S. Chakraborty, H. Yuan
and W. D. Jones, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 6350.
11 R. Yamaguchi, C. Ikeda, Y. Takahashi and K. Fujita, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 8410; K. Fujita, Y. Tanaka,
M. Kobayashi and R. Yamaguchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014,
136, 4829; K. Fujita, T. Wada and T. Shiraishi, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 10886; J. Wu, D. Talwar,
S. Johnston, M. Yan and J. Xiao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2013, 52, 6983; á. Vivancos, M. Beller and M. Albrecht, ACS
Catal., 2018, 8, 17; B. Maji and J. Choudhury, Chem.
Commun., 2019, 55, 4574.
12 D. A. Hey, R. M. Reich, W. Baratta and F. E. Kühn, Coord.
Chem. Rev., 2018, 374, 114.
Dalton Trans.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020