Please do not adjust margins
RSC Advances
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA09701D
ARTICLE
Journal Name
ppm) and coupling constants in Hz. Splitting patterns were plated to ~70% confluence in 96ꢀwell plates 24 h before
described as singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), quartet (q) or treatment. Prior to the compounds’ treatment, the dulbecco's
multiplet (m). The mass spectra were obtained on a Bruker modified eagle medium (DMEM) was removed and replaced
Autoflex III smart beam mass spectrometer. The Xꢀray with fresh DMEM, and aliquots of the compound stock
diffraction measurements were performed on a CCD area solutions (1 mM DMSO) were added to obtain final
detector using graphite monochromated MoKa radiation (
.71069 (Å) at 298 (2) K. The nonꢀhydrogen atoms were were incubated for 24 h at 37
refined anisotropically and hydrogen atoms were introduced Subsequently, the cells were treated with 5 mg / mL MTT (40
geometrically. Calculations were performed with SHELXTLꢀ97 µL/well) and incubated for an additional 4 h (37 , 5% CO ).
λ
=
concentrations of 5, 10, 20, 30 and 50 mM. The treated cells
0
℃
and under 5% CO .
2
℃
2
program package. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) Then, DMEM was removed, the formazan crystals were
measurements were conducted on a Malvern Zetasizer Nano dissolved in DMSO (150 µL/well), and the absorbance at 570
ZS90 size analyzer. The oneꢀphoton absorption (OPA) spectra nm was recorded. The cell viability (%) was calculated
were recorded on the UVꢀ3600 spectrophotometer. The oneꢀ according to the Eq. (5):
photon emission fluorescence (OPEF) spectra measurements
were performed using
spectrophotometer. The quartz cuvettes used were of 1 cm path
length. The slit pass width of emission spectra: 10 nm, Voltage:
a
Hitachi Fꢀ7000 fluorescence Cell viability(%) = OD570 (sample) ×100 Eq.(5)
OD570 (control)
Where OD570 (sample) represents the optical density of the
wells treated with various concentration of the compounds and
500 V. 2PA cross sections (σ) of the samples were obtained by
Open Aperture Zꢀscan method and Ti: sapphire system (680ꢀ OD570 (control) represents that of the wells treated with DMEM
1
080 nm, 80 MHz, 140 fs) as the light source.
+ 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). Three independent trials were
conducted, and the averages and standard deviations are
reported. The reported percent cell survival values are relative
to untreated control cells.
Synthesis
Synthesis of the intermediate 1-3. The compounds
1
,
2
and
3
were prepared according with the reported method.
Acknowledgments
Synthesis of compounds T1-3. Compound
1 (273 mg, 1
mmol) and 4ꢀNitrophenylacetonitrile (194 mg, 1.2 mmol) were This work was supported by The National Natural Science Fou
dissolved in 30 mL of absolute ethyl alcohol, then piperidine ndation of China (21271003, 21271004, 51432001 and 514720
was added in catalytic amount (1 mL) and the reaction mixture 02), Science and Technology Plan of Anhui Province (1604b06
was refluxed at 80 ºC for 2 h. After the reaction finished, the 02016), the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of
solvent was removed via vacuum filter and dried to give a red China, Higher Education Revitalization Plan Talent Project of
1
powder (379.44 mg, yield: 91%). T1: H NMR (DMSOꢀ
d
6
, 400 Anhui Province (2013).
MHz, ppm)
(
(
δ
: 6.95 (d,
t, 4H), 7.92 (d, = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.98 (d,
s, 1H), 8.32 (d,
: 103.70, 118.01, 119.21, 124.29, 125.10, 125.22,
25.96, 126.30, 129.94, 131.52, 140.84, 145.56, 145.69,
J
= 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.17ꢀ7.23 (m, 6H), 7.42
J
J
= 8.4 Hz, 2H), 8.15 Notes and References
1
3
J
6
= 8.4 Hz, 2H). C NMR (DMSOꢀd , 100
1
2
J. L. Geng, C. C. Goh, N. D. Tomczak, J. Liu, R. R. Liu, L. Ma, L.
G. Ng, G.G. Gurzadyan and B. Liu, Chem. Mater., 2014, 26,
1874-1880.
X.Liu, Y. M. Sun, Y. H. Zhang, F. Miao, G. C. Wang, H. S. Zhao,
X. Q. Yu, H. Liu and W. Y. Wong, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9,
MHz, ppm)
δ
1
1
4
+
46.75, 150.37. MS (m/z): [M+H] , calcd: 418.1477; found,
18.1538.
3
615-3618.
T2 and T3 were obtained as red powders both over 90%
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
A. R. Morales, A. Frazer, A. W. Woodward, H. Y. A. White, A.
Fonari and K. D. Belfield, J Org. Chem., 2013, 78,1014-1025.
W. Huang, F. S. Tang, B. Li, J. H. Su and H. Tian, J.
Mater.Chem. C., 2014, 2, 1141-1148.
L. Kong, Y. P. Tian, Q. Chen, Q. Zhang, H. Wang, D. Tan, et al.
J. Mater. Chem. C, 2015, 3, 570-581.
T. Jiang, Y. Qu, B. Li, Y. Gao and J. Hua, RSC Adv., 2015, 5,
1
yield by following the similar procedure of T1
DMSOꢀ , 400 MHz, ppm) : 8.33ꢀ8.31 (d,
.21 (s, 2H), 8.01ꢀ7.98 (d, =8.4, 8H), 7.49ꢀ7.45 (t,
H), 7.32ꢀ7.29 (t, = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.23ꢀ7.21 (d,
.18ꢀ7.16 (d, = 8.0 Hz, 4H). C NMR (DMSOꢀ
: 148.88, 146.91, 145.27, 145.09, 140.47, 131.51,
30.24, 127.54, 126.69, 126.50, 126.01, 124.29, 122.56,
.
T2: H NMR
(
d
6
δ
J
= 8.0 Hz, 4H),
= 7.6 Hz,
=7.6, 2H),
, 100 MHz,
8
2
7
J
J
J
J
d
6
1
3
J
ppm)
δ
1
500-1506.
D. D. Li, Y. P. Zhang, Z. Y. Fan, J. Chen, J. H. Yu. Chem. Sci.,
2015, , 6097-6101.
1
+
117.71, 105.32. MS (m/z): [MH] , calcd: 590.1750; found
6
1
D. Zhang, Y. Gao, J. Dong, Q. Sun, W. Liu, S. Xue and W. Yang,
Dyes Pigments., 2015, 113, 307-311.
X. Zhang, X. Zhang, L. Tao, Z. Chi, J. Xu and Y. Wei, J. Mater.
Chem. B, 2014, 2, 4398–4414.
5
8
1
90.1750. T3
.34(d, = 8.4 Hz, 6H), 8.29(s, 3H), 8.08ꢀ8.02(q,
2H), 7.32ꢀ7.30(d,
:
H NMR (DMSOꢀ
d
6
,
400 MHz, ppm)
δ
: 8.36ꢀ
=7.4Hz,
=8.4 Hz, 6H). C NMR (DMSOꢀ , 100
J
J
1
3
J
d
6
MHz, ppm) δ: 106.35, 117.55, 124.33, 124.78, 126.75, 128.93, 10 Y. Hong, J. W. Y. Lam and B. Z. Tang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011,
+
1
31.64, 140.35, 145.22 147.11, 148.17. MS (m/z): [M+H] ,
40, 5361-5388.
1
1
1 C. W. T. Leung, Y. Hong, S. Chen, E. Zhao, J. W. Y. Lam and B.
Z. Tang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 62-65.
2 A. Qin, J. W. Y. Lam and B. Z. Tang, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2012,
37,
182-209.
calcd: 762.2023; found 762.9845.
Cytotoxicity assays in cells
To ascertain the cytotoxic effect of the three compounds, the
MTT assay was performed. HepG2 cells were trypsinized and
6
| J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins