Synthesizing Crystalline Metallosilicates
A R T I C L E S
modifications. With the increase in number, these kinds of
zeolites are gradually forming an important family of mi-
croporous materials. As a representative among them, the
MWW-type aluminosilicate, well-known as MCM-22, has
already found important industrial applications to the selective
production of bulk petrochemicals such as cumene and ethyl-
benzene.13 However, the recently developed MWW-type ti-
tanosilicate, Ti-MWW, has been demonstrated to be an effective
catalyst for the epoxidation of various alkenes and ammoxi-
mation of ketones using hydrogen peroxide as a clean oxidant.14
The 3D structures of the above zeolites are invariably
constructed via topotactic dehyoxylation between the layers in
2D lamellar precursors. The interlayer pore entrance, originally
wide and open, then tends to be narrowed as a result of the
condensation of hydroxyl groups and the removal of SDA
molecules intercalated into the layers. More attractive applica-
tions are expected if new crystalline structures could be
constructed by postsynthesis with expanded pore systems but
still composed of the same framework units as the lamellar
zeolites. Two useful techniques, that is, the phase delamination15
and the interlayer pillaring with amorphous silica,16 have then
been developed to make full use of their potentially open
porosity, together with the frameworks of zeolitic nature. Both
delamination and pillaring are based on the swelling of the
lamellar precursor with surfactant in advance, a procedure
commonly used for the layered silicates. To cause structural
swelling, the zeolitic lamellar precursors with more stable and
stronger interlayer cross-linkages generally require much more
severe conditions of the basic media. This then inevitably leads
to a partial dissolution of the silicalite framework and also to a
structural degradation.17,18 Recently, it was reported that the
swelling with surfactant and then the expansion of the interlayer
spaces could be realized effectively at room temperature. This
weak treatment at low temperature is considered to be advanta-
geous to the preservation of the intralayer structure of the MCM-
22 precursor.18 Nevertheless, the swollen MCM-22 thus pre-
pared is only useful for interlayer pillaring with silica, but is
not suitable for delamination. Other new methods, which are
capable of opening the porosity and constructing new crystalline
structures but without destroying the basic building units,
are urgently expected to widen the range of applications of these
zeolites having lamellar precursors.
cationic surfactant, silylation, alcoholysis, and subsequent
condensation, which are usually required for the nonzeolitic
layered silicates.19 The resulting materials with expanded pore
windows, high crystallinity, and outstanding hydrothermal
stability are proven to be active solid acid and redox catalysts
for processing bulky molecules.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Syntheses of Lamellar Precursors of Various Zeolites.
Ti- or B-containing MWW lamellar precursor was hydrother-
mally synthesized using hexamethyleneimine (HMI) as an SDA
from the gels with the molar compositions of 1.0 SiO2:
(0-0.033) TiO2: 0.67 B2O3: 1.4 HMI: 19 H2O following
previously reported procedures.14a Using the same method
described for the MWW-type ferrisilicate,20 the MWW lamellar
precursors containing Al, Ga, or Fe were synthesized from the
gels of 1.0 SiO2: 0.033 M2O3: 0.9 HMI: 0.15 Na2O: 40 H2O,
where M represents Al, Ga, or Fe. The crystallization was
carried out in Teflon-lined steel autoclaves under rotation (100
rpm) at 413 K for 7-10 days. The FER lamellar precursor,
so-called PREFER, was hydrothermally synthesized using
4-amino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine as an SDA following
previously reported method.5 The gel with the compositions of
1.0 SiO2: 1.0 SDA: 1.5 NH4F: 1.0 HF: 15 H2O was crystallized
in autoclave at 443 K for 7 days. The precursor of CDO
topology, generally denoted PLS-1, was synthesized using
tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAOH) as an SDA ac-
cording to the literature method.7 The gel with a composition
of 1.0 SiO2: 0.2 TMAOH: 18K2O: 9 H2O: 3.4 Dioxane was
crystallized in autoclave under rotation at 423 K for 10 days.
A pure silicalite precursor with the MCM-47 structure was
synthesized using tetramethylene bis(N-methylpyrrolidinium)
dibromide as an SDA, which was synthesized through the
reaction of 1-methylpyrrolidine with 1,4-dibromobutane.8 The
product of lamellar precursor was crystallized from the gel with
a composition of 1 SiO2: 0.12 TMAOH: 0.30 NaOH: 40 H2O
at 443 K for 6 days.
All crystalline products were collected by filteration, washed
repeatedly with deionized water, and then dried at 473 K
overnight to obtain the lamellar precursors. A portion of
precursor was calcined in air at 823 K for 10 h to burn off the
occluded organic species to obtain corresponding zeolites with
3D structures.
2.2. Alkoxysilylation of Lamellar Precursors. The zeolite
precursors were alkoxysilylated with Me2Si(OEt)2 under low
pH conditions. Typically, 1 g of precursor was mixed with 50 g
of aqueous solution of 2M HNO3 and a desirable amount of
Me2Si(OEt)2 (TCI). The mixture was then refluxed at 373 K
for 20 h to induce the silylation. The solid-to-liquid weight ratio
was always fixed at 1:50, while the amount of alkoxysilane was
varied in the range of 0-0.3 g per gram of lamellar precursor.
The silylated sample was filtered and washed with deionized
water repeatedly and dried at 393 K for 10 h. The samples were
further calcined in air at 823 K for 10 h to remove any organic
species. The resulting interlayer expanded zeolites are denoted
IEZ-ABC, where ABC represents the three letter code of the
zeolite structure.
We report here a versatile method of converting 2D lamellar
precursors into novel 3D crystalline metallosilicates according
to a strategy of inserting a monomeric Si source into the
interlayer spaces through one-step dialkoxysilylation followed
by removal of the organic moieties. Such a simple soft-chemical
methodology for expanding the pore structure avoids stepwise
modifications such as interlayer expanding by ion-exchange with
(13) Cheng, J. C.; Degnan, T. F.; Beck, J. S.; Huang, Y. Y.; Kalyanaraman,
M.; Kowalski, J. A.; Loehr, C. A.; Mazzone, D. N. Stud. Surf. Sci.
Catal. 1998, 121, 53–58.
(14) (a) Wu, P.; Tatsumi, T.; Komatsu, T.; Yashima, T. J. Phys. Chem. B
2001, 105, 2897–2905. (b) Wu, P.; Tatsumi, T.; Komatsu, T.; Yashima,
T. J. Catal. 2001, 202, 245–255. (c) Song, F.; Liu, Y.; Wu, H.; He,
M.; Wu, P.; Tatsumi, T. J. Catal. 2006, 237, 359–367. (d) Wang, L.;
Liu, Y.; Xie, W.; Zhang, H.; Wu, H.; Jiang, Y.; He, M.; Wu, P. J.
Catal. 2007, 246, 205–214.
(15) Roth, Q. J.; Kresge, C. T.; Vartuli, J. C.; Leonowicz, M. E.; Fung,
A. S.; McCullen, S. B. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1995, 94, 301–308.
(16) Corma, A.; Forne´s, V.; Pergher, S. B.; Maesen, Th; L. M.; Buglass,
G. Nature 1998, 396, 353–440.
(19) (a) Mochizuki, D.; Shimojima, A.; Imagawa, T.; Kuroda, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7183–7191. (b) Mochizuki, D.; Kuroda, K.
New J. Chem. 2006, 30, 277–285.
(17) Wu, P.; Nuntasri, D.; Ruan, J.; Liu, Y.; He, M.; Fan, W.; Terasaki,
O.; Tatsumi, T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 19126–19131.
(18) Maheswari, S.; Jordan, E.; Kumar, S.; Bates, F. S.; Penn, R. L.; Shantz,
D. F.; Tsapatsis, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1507–1516.
(20) Wu, P.; Ling, H.; Komatsu, T.; Yashima, T. Chem. Commun. 1997,
663–664.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 26, 2008 8179