By contrast, just two cis selective 1,4-addition protocols
for 4-substituted 2-cyclohexenones have been developed.
might result in cis selective addition to 4-alkoxy enones by
analogy with the proposed role of Al in some cis selective
additions of alkynyl and trialkyl aluminum reagents to
7
2
The first was Danishefsky et al.’s HgI catalyzed cis addition
8
15
of silyl ketene acetals to 4-O-siloxy-2-cyclohexenones, and
the second was Liotta et al.’s Mg-alkoxide promoted cis-
3-alkoxy-2-cyclopentenones.
Preliminary experiments established that the lithium eno-
late of methyldithioacetate (LMDTA) underwent smooth 1,4-
addition to 2-cyclohexenone (1) in THF at -78 °C and that
the resulting enolate could be trapped using Comins’ reagent
to give the vinyl triflate 2 in 83% yield (Scheme 2).
addition of alkyl and aryl Grignard reagents to 4-hydroxy-
9
2
-cyclohexenones. The Liotta method was originally de-
veloped for substrates having a tert-hydroxyl directing group
but has subsequently been used by White with a sec-hydroxyl
directing group10 (Scheme 1).
Scheme 2. 1,4-Addition of LMDTA to 2-Cyclohenenone (1)
Scheme 1. Stereoselective Conjugate Addition Reactions to
and Trapping with Comins’ Reagent
Cyclic 4-Alkoxy Enones
Applying the same conditions but using (()-4-O-TBS-2-
cyclohexenone (3) as the substrate and initially quenching
4
with aqueous NH Cl we were intrigued to find that two
Danishefsky et al. ascribed the cis selectivity in their silyl
ketene acetal additions to stereoelectronically controlled
isomeric products 4 and 5 were formed exclusively depend-
ing on whether the reactions were quenched at -78 °C or
after warming to room temperature, respectively (Scheme
8
c,11
attack anti to the best σ donor (i.e., σCH not σCO).
Swiss
and Liotta proposed association of the nucleophile with
hydroxy function then intramolecular delivery in their
3
).
9
b
protocol.
In connection with a total synthesis program directed
Scheme 3. 1,4-Addition of LMDTA to
12
toward the synthesis of Amaryllidaceae alkaloids we were
interested in developing a method for cis selective 1,4-
addition of a functionalized 2-carbon nucleophile to a 4-O-
TBS-2-cyclohexenone under conditions which would allow
for the trapping of the resulting enolate at oxygen as the
vinyl triflate. Neither of the aforementioned methods proved
suitable so we sought to develop a new protocol.
(
()-4-O-TBS-2-cyclohexenone (3)sNH
4
Cl Quench at -78 °C
and after Warming to Room Temperature
Metzner has shown that lithium dithioester enolates
13
undergo smooth 1,4-addition to a range of enones including
trans selective 1,4-addition (dr 94:6) to 4-methyl-2-cyclo-
hexenone.14 We envisaged that the high oxaphilicity of Li
(7) More recently, Yamazaki reported that 1,4-addition of the potassium
enolate of cyanoethyl acetate to enone 3 proceeded with moderate cis
selectivity (dr 73:22); no rationale was proposed: Yamazaki, N.; Kusangagi,
T.; Kibayashi, C. Tetahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6509-6512.
As we were unable to establish the relative stereochem-
istries between C3 and C4 in the products 4 and 5 by NOE
measurements, the stereochemical assignments for these
products were established by conversion to the novel trans
ketolactone 7t and the known cis ketolactone 7c, respectively.
(8) (a) Danishefsky, S. J.; Simoneau, B. Pure Appl. Chem. 1988, 60,
1
555-1562. (b) Danishefsky, S. J.; Simoneau, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989,
1
11, 2599-2604. (c) Jeroncic, L. O.; Cabal, M. P.; Danishefsky, S. J. J.
Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 387-395.
(9) (a) Solomon, M.; Jamison, W. C. L.; McCormick, M.; Liotta, D.;
16
This involved HgO-mediated conversion to the isomeric
Cherry, D. A.; Mills, J. E.; Shah, R. D.; Rodgers, J. D.; Maryanoff, C. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3702-3704. (b) Swiss, K. A.; Liotta, D. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 9393-9394. (c) Swiss, K. A.; Hinkley, W.;
Maryanoff, C. A.; Liotta, D. C. Synthesis 1992, 127-131. (d) Booker-
Milburn, K. I.; Jenkins, H.; Charmant, J. P. H.; Mohr, P. Org. Lett. 2003,
(14) Berrada, S.; Metzner, P. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1986, 817-821.
(15) (a) Pappo, R.; Collins, P. W. Tetahedron Lett. 1972, 2627-2630.
(b) Collins, P. W.; Dajani, E. Z.; Bruhn, M. S.; Brown, C. H.; Palmer, J.
R.; Pappo, R. Terahedron Lett. 1975, 4217-4220. (c) Collins, P. W.; Dajani,
E. Z.; Driskill, D. R.; Bruhn, M. S.; Jung, C. J.; Pappo, R. J. Med. Chem.
1977, 20, 1152-1159. (d) Caddick, S.; Delisser, V. M. Terahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 2355-2358. (e) Yakura, T.; Tanaka, K.; Iwamoto, M.; Nameki,
M.; Ikeda, M. Synlett 1999, 1313-1315. (f) Yakura, T.; Tanaka, K.; Kitano,
T.; Uenishi, J.; Ikeda, M. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 7715-7721.
5
, 3309-3312.
(10) White, J. D. Pure Appl. Chem. 1994, 2183-2188.
(11) Cieplak, A. S. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 1265-1336.
(12) Rinner, U.; Hudlicky, T. Synlett 2005, 365-387.
(13) (a) Metzner, P. Synthesis 1992, 1185-1199. (b) Berrada, S.; Desert,
S.; Metzner, P. Tetrahedron 1988, 44, 3575-3586. (c) Berrada, S.; Metzner,
P.; Rakotonirina, R. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1985, 881-890.
(16) Jung, M. E.; Parker, M. H. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7094-7095.
3892
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 18, 2006