178
P.A. Robles-Dutenhefner et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 399 (2011) 172–178
ones [27].
under mild conditions. The use of the renewable biomass-based
compounds as the substrates, chromium immobilized in a solid
matrix as the catalyst, molecular oxygen as the final oxidant,
and solvent free conditions are significant practical advantages of
this environmentally friendly process. The catalyst undergoes no
metal leaching, and can be easily recovered and re-used without a
special treatment. The Cr-MCM-41 material exhibited better per-
formance than the sample prepared by the conventional sol–gel
method without the surfactant. Further studies are directed toward
the applications of chromium-incorporated ordered mesoporous
molecular sieves for the oxidation of other renewable substrates.
It should be mentioned that, in the presence of chromium cat-
alysts, both limonene and ␣-pinene have demonstrated a stronger
preference to allylic oxidation over epoxidation as compared to
cobalt catalysts. In our previous works [25,27] a molar ratio
between allylic oxidationand epoxidationproductsat the oxidation
of limonene and ␣-pinene over the cobalt catalysts varied from 1/1
to 2/1, whereas the Cr-MCM-41 catalyst produced allylic products
in much higher proportions (3/1–6/1). Thus, chromium catalysts
represent interesting alternative for the conventional cobalt cat-
alysts in the aerobic oxidations of essential oil-based alkenes;
in addition, they could result in fragrance mixtures with other
organoleptic characteristics.
Acknowledgments
The Cr–SiO2/sol–gel material also promoted the oxidation of
all three substrates, -pinene, limonene and ␣-pinene. Product
bined selectivity for products 4–7 formed from -pinene decreased
from 92% with the Cr-MCM-41 catalyst to 74% with the conven-
tional catalyst prepared without the surfactant, Cr–SiO2/sol–gel
(Table 2, run 1 vs. run 6). Similar results were obtained at the oxi-
dation of ␣-pinene (Table 3, run 1 vs. run 3) and limonene (Table 4,
run 1 vs. run 3), where the combined selectivity for the identified
products decreased from 83 to 59% and from 75 to 48%, respectively.
Although the surface area of the Cr-MCM-41 material is two
and a half times higher than that of Cr–SiO2/sol–gel (Table 1), their
activities were quite similar. Thia could be related to the fact that
in the Cr–SiO2/sol–gel a larger proportion of chromium might be
accessible for the substrate due to the larger amounts of extra-
framework Cr2O3 or/and less amounts of small pores.
Financial support from the CNPq, CAPES, FAPEMIG and INCT-
Catálise (Brazil) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors wish to
thank the Microscopy Center, UFMG, Brazil and the LNLS syn-
chrotron laboratory, Campinas, Brazil for the equipment time.
References
[1] I.W.C.E. Arends, R.A. Sheldon, Appl. Catal., A 212 (2001) 175–187.
[2] M. Ziolek, Catal. Today 90 (2004) 145–150.
[3] C.T. Kresge, M.E. Leonowicz, W.J. Roth, J.C. Vartuli, J.S. Beck, Nature 359 (1992)
710–712.
[4] J.S. Beck, J.C. Vartuli, W.J. Roth, M.E. Leonowicz, C.T. Kresge, K.C. Chu, D.H.
Olson, E.W. Sheppard, S.B. McCullen, J.L. Schenkler, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992)
10834–10843.
[5] P.A. Robles-Dutenhefner, K.A. da Silva Rocha, E.M.B. Sousa, E.V. Gusevskaya, J.
Catal. 265 (2009) 72–79.
[6] J. Muzart, Chem. Rev. 92 (1992) 113–140.
[7] B.M. Choudary, A.D. Prasad, V. Swapna, V.L.K. Valli, V. Bhuma, Tetrahedron 48
(1992) 953–962.
[8] H.E.B. Lempers, R.A. Sheldon, Appl. Catal., A 143 (1996) 137–143.
[9] W.A. Carvalho, P.B. Varaldo, M. Wallau, U. Schuchardt, Zeolites 18 (1997)
408–416.
In the previous work [5], we have observed a remarkably high
selectivity of the MCM-41-included cobalt catalyst in the oxida-
tion of isolongifolene. The activity of Co-MCM-41 was much higher
than that of the material prepared by the conventional sol–gel
method without the surfactant. The results obtained in the present
study clearly show that a highly organized structure of the Cr-
MCM-41 material also exerts a pronounced beneficial effect on the
selectivity of the oxidation of -pinene, limonene, and ␣-pinene.
In spite of the Cr–SiO2/sol–gel catalyst having larger pores and
higher total pore volume compared to Cr-MCM-41, the reactions
over Cr–SiO2/sol–gel were less selective. This implies that pore
geometry is a crucial factor to ensure high selectivity of chromium
species during the reaction and to avoid over-oxidation. The struc-
ture of the solid matrix should allow a rapid diffusion of bulky
products throughout the porous medium to prevent successive
reactions. A highly ordered uniform channel-like pore geometry
and facile pore connectivity in the Cr-MCM-41 material should
favor the transport of the products away from the active chromium
sites. The Cr–SiO2/sol–gel material, on the other hand, shows much
more heterogeneous pore shape distribution and might posses
ink-bottle pores with narrow mouths. Thus, the primarily formed
products could undergo a further oxidation in this material due to a
longer contact with catalytically active sites. Besides, the chromium
active sites in Cr-MCM-41 are expected to be more energetically
homogeneous than those in Cr–SiO2/sol–gel, which shows lower
surface uniformity. Thus, the textural properties of the Cr-MCM-41
material remarkably benefit the overall selectivity of the oxidation
reactions.
[10] S. Shylesh, Ch. Srilakshmi, A.P. Singh, B.G. Anderson, Microporous Mesoporous
Mater. 99 (2007) 334–344.
[11] J.D. Chen, R.A. Sheldon, J. Catal. 153 (1995) 1–8.
[12] I.C. Chisem, J. Rafelt, J. Chisem, J.H. Clark, D. Macquarrie, M.T. Shieh, R. Jachuck,
C. Ramshaw, K. Scott, Chem. Commun. (1998) 1949–1950.
[13] S. Shylesh, P.P. Samuel, A.P. Singh, Appl. Catal., A 318 (2007) 128–136.
[14] W. Zhang, J. Wang, P.T. Tanev, T.J. Pinnavaia, Chem. Commun. (1996)
979–980.
[15] N. Ulagappan, C.N.R. Rao, Chem. Commun. (1996) 1047–1048.
[16] T.K. Das, K. Chaudhari, E. Nandanan, A.J. Chandwadkar, A. Sudalai, T. Ravin-
dranathan, S. Sivasanker, Tetrahedron Lett. 38 (1997) 3631–3634.
[17] A. Sakthivel, S.K. Badamali, P. Selvam, Catal. Lett. 80 (2002) 73–76.
[18] N. Srinivas, V. Radha Rani, S.J. Kulkarni, K.V. Raghavan, J. Mol. Catal. A 179 (2002)
221–231.
[19] S. Samanta, N.K. Mal, A. Bhaumik, J. Mol. Catal. A 236 (2005) 7–11.
[20] A. Sakthivel, P. Selvam, J. Catal. 211 (2002) 134–143.
[21] H. Mimoun, Chimia 50 (1996) 620–625.
[22] M.J. da Silva, J.A. Gonc¸ alves, O.W. Howarth, R.B. Alves, E.V. Gusevskaya, J.
Organomet. Chem. 689 (2004) 302–308.
[23] J.A. Gonc¸ alves, M.J. da Silva, D. Piló-Veloso, O.W. Howarth, E.V. Gusevskaya, J.
Organomet. Chem. 690 (2005) 2996–3003.
[24] M.G. Speziali, P.A. Robles-Dutenhefner, E.V. Gusevskaya, Organometallics 26
(2007) 4003–4009.
[25] M.J. da Silva, P.A. Robles-Dutenhefner, L. Menini, E.V. Gusevskaya, J. Mol. Catal.
A 201 (2003) 71–77.
[26] L. Menini, M.J. da Silva, M.F.F. Lelis, J.D. Fabris, R.M. Lago, E.V. Gusevskaya, Appl.
Catal., A 269 (2004) 117–121.
[27] L. Menini, M.C. Pereira, L.A. Parreira, J.D. Fabris, E.V. Gusevskaya, J. Catal. 254
(2008) 355–364.
[28] E.F. Murphy, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, Catal. Today 57 (2000) 115–126.
[29] Y. Shiraishi, Y. Teshima, T. Hirai, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 6257–6263.
[30] F. Amano, T. Yamaguchi, T. Tanaka, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 281–288.
[31] M. Kruk, M. Jaroniec, Chem. Mater. 13 (2001) 3169–3183.
[32] A. Corma, Chem. Rev. 97 (1997) 2373–2419.
[33] A.B. Gaspar, R.L. Martins, M. Schmal, L.C. Dieguez, J. Mol. Catal. A 169 (2001)
105–112.
[34] P. Michorczyk, J. Ogonowski, P. Kusˇıtrowski, L. Chmielarz, Appl. Catal., A 349
(2008) 62–69.
4. Conclusions
[35] T.V.M. Rao, Y. Yang, A. Sayari, J. Mol. Catal. A 301 (2009) 152–158.
[36] K.A. da Silva Rocha, J.L. Hoehne, E.V. Gusevskaya, Chem. Eur. J. 14 (2008)
6166–6172.
In summary, chromium-incorporated molecular sieves are effi-
cient catalysts for the aerobic oxidation of monoterpenic alkenes