CRYSTALLIZATION OF BISULFITE DERIVATIVES
1599
Scheme 2.
Me
Me
Me
(
(
1) NaHSO , crystallization
3
2) Na CO , ∆
2
3
Verbenone (±)-1
+
Verbenone (1R)-1
O
26%
62%, >70% ee
(
from crystals)
(from filtrate)
Verbenone (1R)-1
0% ee
5
(
(
1) NaHSO , crystallization
3
2) Na CO , ∆
2
3
Verbenone (1S)-1
4% ee
Verbenone (1S)-1
+
Verbenone (1S)-1
5
6
7%, 40% ee
20%, >85% ee
(from filtrate)
(
from crystals)
(
(
1S)-2 and (1R)-2 which were acylated with
S)-Mosher’s acid chloride (3) [3] (Scheme 1). The
derivative for preparative purposes is expedient only
when crystalline racemate seeds are available and
conditions are created for its preferential crystallization
from the solution.
ratio of (1S)-2 and (1R)-2 was determined from the
intensities of signals of the geminal methyl groups in
the H NMR spectra. The enantiomeric purity of
a commercial sample of (1S)-1 (Sigma–Aldrich),
determined by the Mosher method, coincided with that
calculated from its optical rotation value (54% ee),
which confirmed reliability this method.
1
Crystalline bisulfite derivative of (1R)-(+)-verbe-
none and isolation of racemic verbenone therefrom.
Sulfur dioxide was passed through a mixture of 37.8 g
(
0.3 mol) of sodium sulfite and 115 mL of water until
a weight gain of 20 g was attained and the solution
turned slightly yellowish. Sodium hydrogen carbonate,
2 g, and (1R)-(+)-verbenone, 1.3 g (8.2 mmol), were
added to 20 mL of the resulting solution, and the
mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature until
it became homogeneous, cooled to 3°C, and kept for
24 h at that temperature. The precipitate was filtered
off and washed with a small amount of a saturated
The ee value of (1S)-1 decreased from 54 to 40%
after its conversion to bisulfite derivative and isolation
from the crystalline fraction. A sample of (1R)-(+)-
verbenone [(1R)-1, 50% ee] was converted to racemic
crystalline bisulfite derivative: the methyl proton
signals of the (S)-Mosher esters with the corresponding
(
1S)- and (1R)-enantiomers of cis-verbenol 2 had equal
intensities.
Thus, it was impossible to isolate enantiomerically
solution of Na
SO . The crystals of bisulfite derivative
2
3
were added to 50 mL of a 10% solution of sodium
carbonate, and the mixture was steam-distilled to
separate racemic verbenone (±)-1. The distillate was
saturated with sodium chloride and extracted with
diethyl ether (3×10 mL). The combined extracts were
dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and evaporated
under reduced pressure. The residue, 0.34 g (26%),
was pure racemic verbenone (±)-1 (according to the
pure crystalline bisulfite derivatives and improve in
this way the optical purity of commercially available
verbenone. We revealed a clear tendency for precipita-
tion of racemic bisulfite derivatives, especially when
the initial substrate had lower ee value and the amount
of the crystalline fraction was low. Therefore, it
became possible to increase the optical purity of verbe-
none by separation of racemic crystalline bisulfite
derivative and isolation of verbenone from the mother
liquor. After separation of racemic verbenone (±)-1
from a sample of (1R)-1 with 50% ee, from the mother
liquor we isolated (1R)-1 in 62% yield with >70% ee.
Likewise, from a sample of (1S)-1 with 54% ee we
isolated 1S-(–)-verbenone in 20% yield with an ee
value of higher than 85%; i.e., the optical purity was
improved by 31% (Scheme 2).
1
H NMR data).
Enantiomerically enriched (1R)-(+)-verbenone
from the mother liquor. After separation of the crys-
talline bisulfite derivative of (1R)-1, the mother liquor
was added to 50 mL of a 15% aqueous solution of
sodium carbonate, and the mixture was steam-distilled.
The distillate was saturated with sodium chloride and
extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 10 mL), and the
combined extracts were dried over anhydrous Na SO
2
4
We believe that the use of the described procedure
for enhancement of the optical purity of verbenone by
crystallization and separation of its racemic bisulfite
and evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue,
0.80 g (62%) was (1R)-(+)-verbenone with >70% ee
1
( H NMR).
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 53 No. 10 2017