10.1002/anie.201900683
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
We can conclude that in MeCN solution the organometallic
µ-oxodiiron(III) complex 1 is in equilibrium with the oxoiron(IV)
species 2 and the ferrous complex 3. This is a rare example of a
thermal disproportionation equilibrium of a FeIII-O-FeIII system
leading to a reactive high-valent iron-oxo intermediate without
addition of further oxidants.[2,9,10] An unprecedented adduct
between 1 and 2 featuring a FeIV=O∙∙∙FeIII–O–FeIII∙∙∙O=FeIV core
could be isolated and structurally authenticated, which we
propose to visualize the substitution step leading to FeIV=O/FeIII–
O–FeIII scrambling. As a result of the disproportionation, we
observed reactivity (albeit very slow) of the µ-oxodiiron(III)
complex 1 in C–H activation. Kinetic analysis of DHA oxidation
allowed for the determination of the equilibrium constant Keq for
the disproportionation, which expectedly is very small. The
particular ability of NHC ligands to stabilize both high and low
oxidation states of metal ions[22] likely is a key factor favoring the
disproportionation. Molecular design to increase Keq might be a
rewarding strategy for the development of Fe-based
homogeneous oxidation catalysts that circumvent the formation
of off-cycle dead-end µ-oxodiiron(III) products. Indeed, iron
complexes ligated by macrocyclic tetracarbene ligands are now
emerging as rugged catalysts for, e.g., epoxidation and
aziridination chemistry.[23]
Scheme 2. Proposed scenario for the scrambling reactions between 1Me16 and
2, or between 1Me16 and 1 (after partial disproportionation of 1 according to
Scheme 1).
A snapshot visualizing this scenario could be obtained by X-
ray structure analysis of a crystalline adduct [2∙1∙2](OTf)8 with a
FeIV=O∙∙∙Fe–O–Fe∙∙∙O=FeIV core, obtained via
a
co-
crystallization experiment from a mixture of 1 and 2 in MeCN
(Figure 3).[20] 2∙1∙2 contains a central µ-oxodiiron(III) entity (1,
Fe2–O2–Fe2’) flanked by two oxoiron(IV) units (2, Fe1−O1) in
an overall linear array (<(Fe1–O1∙∙∙Fe2) 178.2°); the
components are closely interlocked in the adduct (Figure 3,
bottom).[21] The Fe1−O1 bond (1.673(4) Å) and the Fe2−O2
bond (1.769(2) Å) in 2∙1∙2 are only slightly longer than the Fe-O
bonds in parent 2 (1.661(3) Å) and 1 (1.752(2) Å),[11] respectively,
and the O1∙∙∙Fe2 distance between the two components (3.19 Å)
is much longer. However, it is well conceivable that reshuffling of
the Fe−O bonds (and the MeCN) in an adduct 2∙1 according to
Scheme 2 to give 1∙2 is facile, leading to the observed
scrambling in solution. The structure of the adduct 2∙1∙2
suggests a highly nucleophilic character of the O-atom in the
oxoiron(IV) complex 2, in line with its unusually poor OAT
reactivity towards substrates such as phosphines or
thioethers.[13]
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Fonds der Chemischen
Industrie (Kekulꢀ scholarship to C.C.), the DFG (IRTG 1422
“Metal Sites in Biomolecules: Structures, Regulation and
Mechanisms”), and the University of Göttingen.
Keywords: Iron-oxo complexes • C-H activation • N-heterocyclic
carbene ligands • Iron • Kinetics • Organometallic Chemistry
[1]
a) A. R. McDonald, L. Que, Jr., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 414-428;
b) K. Ray, F. F. Pfaff, B. Wang, W. Nam, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2014, 136, 13942-13958; c) S. Sahu, D. P. Goldberg, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2016, 138, 11410-11428; d) I. Gamba, Z. Codola, J. Lloret-Fillol,
M. Costas, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 334, 2-24.
[2]
[3]
a) K. S. Murray, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1974, 11, 1–35.; b) D. M. Kurtz. Jr.,
Chem. Rev. 1990, 90, 585–606.
a) D.-H. Chin, A. L. Balch, G. N. La Mar, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
1446–1448; b) D.-H. Chin, A. L. Balch, G. N. La Mar, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1980, 102, 4344–4350.
[4]
[5]
R. Horikawa, C. Fujimoto, R. Yazaki, T. Ohshima, Chem. Eur. J. 2016,
22, 12278–12281.
A notable exception is [(FPc)Fe]2(μ-O) (FPc is the dianion of
1,4,8,11,15,18,22,25-octakis(trifluoromethyl)phthalocyanine) which was
shown to disproportionate in the presence of 1-methylimidazole or
pyridine and to transfer its oxo atom quantitatively to PMe3 or PPh3: M.
J. Chen, D. E. Fremgen, J. W. Rathke, J. Porphyrines Phthalocyanines
1998, 6, 473-482.
[6]
[7]
A NHC-ligated FeIII-(-O)-FeIII system related to 1 has recently been
reported to mediate the oxygenation of PPh3: M. R. Anneser, S.
Haslinger, A. Pöthig, M. Cokoja, V. D’Elia, M. P. Högerl, J.-M. Basset, F.
E. Kühn, Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 6449–6455.
a) R. M. Richman, M. W. Peterson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104,
5795-5796; b) M. W. Peterson, D. S. Rivers, R. M. Richman, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 2907-2915; c) J. M. Hodgkiss, C. J. Chang, B. J.
Pistorio, D. G. Nocera, Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 8270-8277; d) I. M.
Wasser, H. C. Fry, P. G. Hoertz, G. J. Meyer, K. D. Karlin, Inorg. Chem.
2004, 43, 8272-8281.
Figure 3. Structure of the adduct 2∙1∙2 in solid state (top: ball and stick
representation; bottom: space filling model). Anions and hydrogen atoms have
been omitted for clarity. Figure S17 shows the molecular structure with 50%
probability thermal ellipsoids.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.