r.t.to 500 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min, then kept at 500 °C for 4 h. Subsequently, the sample precursors were reduced by hydrogen
(0.15 L/min) in the nitrogen at 500 °C for 2 h. Finally, the Pd-Cu (5:1)/γ-Al2O3 catalyst was obtained. In order to research the
effect of the loading of metals, different catalysts of Pd/Cu mole ratios were synthesized for use in the oxygenization reaction.
Characterization: The XRD of different samples were recorded on a Rigaku D/MAX 2500 (V) Diffractometer with Cu Kα
radiation and scanned at a rate of 10o/min over the range 20o~90o. The XPS analysis was confirmed on Thermo Fisher Scientific
ESCALAB 250 using a monochromatic Al Kα gun with photonic energy of 1486.6 eV as the X-ray source under reduced vacuum
conditions. The binding energies (B.E.) acquired in the XPS analysis were compensated by using the adventitious C 1s 284.6 eV
signal for any charging effects. The TEM images of catalysts were obtained on a JEOL JEM-2100F Electron Microscope
equipped with EDS at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV. Samples were prepared by ultrasonic dispersion in ethanol and
deposited on a copper grid for analysis.
Catalytic reaction: In a typical procedure, 15 mL cyclopentene (0.17 mol), 60 mL ethyl alcohol (1.03 mol) and Pd-Cu (5:1)/γ-
Al2O3 catalyst (0.24 g, 2.0 wt% of cyclopentene) were added into 0.1 L closed autoclave. The mixture was stirred (400 rpm/min)
under 1.0 MPa oxygen pressure at 100 °C for 7 h. Specific parameters are provided in Supporting Information.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characterization of catalysts
3.1.1. X-ray diffraction
The XRD patterns of Pd/γ-Al2O3, Cu/γ-Al2O3 and diverse Pd-Cu/γ-Al2O3 catalysts are exhibited in Fig. 1. The results show a
low intensity level for all characteristic diffraction planes, except for the planes associated with the γ-Al2O3 support [10]. For γ-
Al2O3, four apparent signals (Fig. 1A) at 2θ = 19.6o, 21.2o, 27.5o, 57.2o were detected, corresponding to the (110), (102), (211)
and (305) facets (JCPDS 50-1496), respectively [11]. Shown in Fig. 1B is the XRD patterns of Cu/γ-Al2O3 catalysts with
apparent signals at 2θ = 43.3o and 74.1o corresponding to the (111) and (220) facets (JCPDS 04-0836). In Fig. 1C, there are four
signals at 2θ = 27.3o (PdO, JCPDS 50-1496) and 40.1o, 46.7o, 68.2o (Pd, JCPDS 46-1043) and the Cu peak found at 2θ = 43.3o
facets (JCPDS 04-0836). Three apparent signals at 2θ = 30.580o, 35.121o and 63.106o facets (JCPDS 48-0587) are due to Pd-Cu
bimetallic alloys peaks (Fig. 1C, D, E). The XRD spectra of Pd-Cu/γ-Al2O3 with different mole ratios of Pd/Cu show that the
diffraction peaks became wider and the positions of the diffraction peaks were shifted to lower angle with the addition of Pd
content. Shifting to lower angle is probably due to the formation of a nano-alloy and the wider diffraction signal indicated that
the crystal grain became smaller and the Pd content would be helpful into the reduction of Cu. No signals of the Pd species could
be observed in the XRD spectra of Pd-Cu/γ-Al2O3, which may be attributed to the good dispersion of Pd [12]. In addition, the
calculative results indicated that the size of Pd-Cu crystalline grain was around 13.4, 15.1 and 16.3 nm by the Scherrer formula.
In conclusion, we need further data to confirm the presence of hypothetical Pd-Cu bimetallic nanoparticles in catalysts by XPS
and TEM analysis.
3.1.2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
The Pd-Cu/γ-Al2O3 XPS spectra of different Pd-Cu molar ratios are shown in Fig. 2. The results show that there were two
oxygenization states in XPS Cu 2p spectra. The binding energies in Fig. 2. centered at 953.1 eV (2p1/2) and 932.7 eV (2p3/2) were
attributed to Cu0 and CuI [13]. The differences of Cu0 and CuI were not obvious at the 2p signals because the binding energy only
exhibit 0.1 eV differences [14]. The Cu0 and CuI species, usually appear below 933 eV and CuII typically appears with binding
energies higher than 933 eV. The XPS spectra of Cu/γ-Al2O3 showed that oxidized CuII existed, which was indicated by both
second sets of spin-orbit split peaks shifted by 1.3±0.2 eV to higher binding energy. It could be observed that the satellite peak at
942 eV for CuII which became weaker with the addition of Pd and might indicate that CuII transforms to CuI/Cu from the XPS
spectra of the Pd-Cu/γ-Al2O3 [12].
In Fig. 3, the Pd 3d5/2 appeared at 335±0.1 and 336.1 ±0.1 eV in all the catalysts, which correspond to Pd0 and PdII, respectively
[15, 6]. The Pd primary state in the Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst was Pd0 and PdII, while Pd0 was the main valence state in diverse Pd-
Cu/γ-Al2O3 samples. In Fig.3, the peaks of PdII were shifted to weaker B.E. with added Cu, which might indicate that PdII
transformed into Pd0 [6, 16].
Furthermore, the surface atom percentages of Pd and Cu shown in Table 1 did not correspond to the preparation. According to
the XPS spectra, the metals were introduced into the core of γ-Al2O3, or covered by the visible metal. The above results
illustrated that appropriate ratio (1:1) of the surface atom percentages of Pd and Cu led to the simultaneous distribution of the two
metals on the surface of the catalysts [8, 17].
3.1.3. Transmission electron microscopy
Page 3 of 8