J. Han et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 527 (2016) 72–80
73
stream flowing at 20 mL min−1. The amount of H2 consumption
during reduction was monitored by a TCD.
[14–17], little information is available on the degradation mecha-
nism involved in the catalytic degradation of dye.
The aim of this work is to evaluate the potential application of
a synthesized CuMgAlO catalyst in CWPO using azo dye methyl
orange (MO) as a target compound. The physico-chemical prop-
erties of the CuMgAlO catalyst were characterized by XRD, FT-IR,
SEM/EDS, TG/DTA, XPS, H2-TPR and BET in order to clarify the rela-
tionship between structure and catalytic performance. Activity and
stability of the CuMgAlO catalyst were investigated in the CWPO
of MO, and the degradation mechanism of MO in the CWPO was
determined by UV-vis, ATR-FTIR and GC–MS.
2.4. MO dye degradation
0.3 g catalyst (MgAlO, CuO, CuMgAlO and so on) was added
into 200 mL methyl orange (MO) synthetic wastewater containing
100 mg L−1 MO. Then 6 mL of 30% H2O2 was added, and the reac-
tion was conducted at 55 ◦C, pH 6.0, magnetic stirrer (150 rpm) and
atmospheric pressure for 120 min. After the reaction, the reaction
solution was centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 3 min. The supernatant
was kept for MO measurement by the spectrophotometric method
(Hitachi U-2910) at 464 nm, and the precipitate was washed three
times. The solutions produced from the washing steps were stored
for MO determination. PE 5100 PC atomic absorption spectroscopy
(AAS) instrument was used to determine the contents of Cu element
in the supernatant. All the experiments were carried out in tripli-
cate under the same condition and average values are reported. The
MO degradation rate (ꢁ %) was calculated as follows [19],
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
All the chemicals used in the study were of analytical
reagent grade and solutions were prepared with deionized water.
0.1 mol L−1 NaOH and HCl solutions were used for pH adjustment.
A pH electrode (Mettler Toledo S40 K) was used for pH measure-
ments.
A0 − Ae
ꢁ% =
× 100%
A0
2.2. Preparation of the CuMgAlO catalyst
where Ao and Ae were the initial and final absorbance values of MO
dye, respectively.
The CuMgAlO catalyst was prepared by coprecipitation and
impregnation. First, the precursor MgAl hydrotalcite with Mg/Al
molar ratio of 4.0 (MgAl-LDH) was prepared by urea hydrolysis
according to the literature previously described [18]. Part of the
precursor MgAl-LDH was calcined at 500 ◦C for 4 h, which was
denoted as MgAlO. Second, the CuMgAlO catalyst was prepared
by impregnation that 1.00 g L−1 of MgAlO was put into 500 mL
aqueous solution containing 0.01 mol L−1 CuCl2. The mixture was
maintained at 50 ◦C for 12 h under stirring (200 rpm) before it was
filtered. The filter was washed with deionized water to neutrality,
and dried at 80 ◦C for 10 h, which was denoted as CuMgAl-LDH.
Part of the CuMgAl-LDH precursor was calcined at 500 ◦C for 4 h
and cooled to room temperature, which was denoted as CuMgAlO.
2.5. Identification of reaction intermediates
During the CWPO, the identification of the intermediates
at specified time intervals was performed employing a USA
Agillent 6890/5793N gas chromatography-mass spectrometry sys-
tem (GC–MS). A HP-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 m;
Hewlett Packard, USA) was used. The column temperature was held
at 50 ◦C for 2 min and then increased from 50 to 240 ◦C at a rate
of 10 ◦C min−1. The MS conditions were EI impact ionization 70 eV,
helium as the carrier gas, injection temperature 250 ◦C, source tem-
perature 150 ◦C, scanning from m/z 70–350 at 0.3 mL min−1 during
the recording mass spectra. When the reactions were completed
for 5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 min, respectively, the supernatant for each
experiment was analyzed by GC–MS.
2.3. Characterization of the catalysts
At the same time, the intermediates were also determined using
a Shimadzu UV-2550 spectrophotometer and a attenuated total
reflectance FT-IR (ATR-FT-IR) instrument, respectively. ATR-FTIR
spectra of the sample in the ATR cell was recorded at 2 cm−1 res-
olution and signal averaging of 64 scans on PE Spectrum One B
instrument. Background was subtracted using the Opus software.
Curve fitting was then performed using Origin 8.0 software and
PeakFit v4.12.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected on a Japan
Rigaku D/max 2550PC ( = 1.5405 Å) with CuK␣ radiation. The scan
step was 0.02 (2ꢀ) with a filament intensity of 30 mA and a voltage
of 40 kV. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrum was recorded
on Perkin-Elmer Spectrum One B instrument using KBr pellet tech-
nique. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM-6700F) and
energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS, S-4800-I, Hitachi) were used
to characterize the surface morphology and the compositions of the
samples. The specific surface area, pore volume and diameter were
determined by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and Barrett-Joyner-
Hallender (BJH) using a NOVA-e1000 system (Quantachrome, USA),
respectively. Before being analyzed, the samples had to be heated
at 150 ◦C for 6 h to remove surface water. Samples were outgassed
at 110 ◦C in vacuum (1 × 10−4 Torr) for 8 h. Thermogravimetric and
differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA) was carried out in a nitrogen
atmosphere with a Seiko 6300 TG-DTA instrument with a heat-
3. Results and discussion
3.1.1. XRD analyses
To identify the structure change of the catalysts in the prepa-
of MgAl hydrotalcite structure (JCPDS 70-2151) with sharp and
intense (003), (006), (009), (110) and (113) reflections. No other
crystalline phase is observed, where the interlayer distance (d003
0.788 nm) is typical of CO32− hydrotalcite [18,20]. The hydrotalcite-
like structure without any reflections of other possible phases is
also present in the CuMgAl-LDH, suggesting the complete incor-
poration of transition Cu species into the crystalline structure.
Compared to the MgAl-LDH, the CuMgAl-LDH exhibits broader and
less intense reflections with an unstable baseline, indicating a lower
ing rate of 10 ◦C min−1 under a He stream flowing at 60 mL min−1
.
X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) of samples were recorded on a
Thermo ESCALAB 250 spectrometer equipped with Al K␣ radiation
(1486.6 eV). The binding energies were calculated with respect to
C 1 s peak at 285 eV with a precision of 0.2 eV. H2-Temperature-
programmed reduction (H2-TPR) experiment was performed out
on a Quantachrome ChemBET equipment. For this, 25 mg of cata-
lyst (CuMgAlO) was exposed to argon (20 mL min−1) at 200 ◦C for
2 h. The sample was cooled to room temperature, and then heated
to 800 ◦C at a heating rate of 10 ◦C min−1 under a 10% H2 in argon