G.G. Mohamed et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 72 (2009) 610–615
615
Table 6
Fungicidal activity of the local formulation (25% WP) and the standard fungicide (Monceren 25% WP) on the three tested fungi.
Conc. (ppm)
F. solani
R. solani
S. rolfesii
Mean growth zone (mm)
% of inhibition
Mean growth zone (mm)
% of inhibition
Mean growth zone (mm)
% of inhibition
500
400
300
200
100
Control (0)
24.5
27
30
32.7
45
90.9
72.8
70
66.7
63.7
50
27.4
40.7
43
47
57
90.9
69.5
54.8
52.2
47.8
36.6
0
0
11.3
24
32.2
90
90.9
100
87.4
73.3
64.1
0
0
0
EC50
EC50**
*
90.94 ppm
2467.70 ppm
207.52 ppm
48.0 ppm
206.23 ppm
2309.18 ppm
EC50* is the effective concentration of the new formulation.
EC50** is the effective concentration of the standard fungicide (Monceren 25% WP).
3.2. Fungicidal activity
respectively. Data shown reflects the higher fungicidal activity of
the new formulation as compared with the standard fungicide on
F. solani and S. rolfesii fungi but not for R. solani fungus.
Data in Table 5 shows that the EC50 values of the prepared com-
plexes on R. solani and S. rolfesii fungi are lower than that of the
corresponding free ligand. This means that, the complexation pro-
cess increases the fungicidal potency on these two tested fungi.
The ranges of EC50 values of the complexes on R. solani fungus are
205.46–305.14 and 196.64–393.58 ppm on S. rolfsii but that of the
free ligand are 521.00 and 800.12 ppm on R. solani and S. rolfesii,
respectively. The high fungitoxic effect of the complexes than the
free ligand can be understood in term of chelation theory which
stated that, upon complexation the polarity of the metal ion gets
reduced which increases the lipophilicity of the metal complexes,
facilitating them to cross the cell membrane easily [24].
4. Conclusion
•
Many transition metal complexes were synthesized from the ben-
zimidazole dithiocarbamate ligand (HL).
•
Complexation process increases the fungicidal activity of the lig-
and.
•
Cobalt complex was found to be the most potent one against the
three tested soil borne fungi so it was formulated as 25% WP.
•
Fungicidal activity of the new formulation was evaluated and
compared with the standard fungicide (Monceren 25% WP).
•
In contrast, F. solani fungus shows higher resistance to the syn-
thesized complexes than the free ligand with exception of the cobalt
and nickel complexes. Generally, cobalt complex shows the high-
est fungicidal activity as it has the lowest EC50 values on the three
tested fungi. These values are 353.55, 205.45 and 196.84 ppm for
F. solani, R. slani and S. rolfesii fungi, respectively. Consequently, we
formulated this complex to make it commercially available as a
local fungicide after satisfying all required studies.
Data obtained showed the higher fungicidal activity of the new
formulation than the standard fungicide in most cases.
References
[1] B.V. Kumar, V.M. Reddy, Indian J. Chem.: Sect. B 24B (1985) 1298.
[2] J.F. Olin, [U.S. 3 (1975) 860], C.A., 82 (1975) 155907.
[3] L. Mishra, S. Kagini, J. Indian Chem. Soc. 76 (1999) 500.
[4] E.R. Gulgun, N. Altanlar, A. Akin, IlFarmaco, 51 (1996) 413; C.A., 125 (1996)
221699.
[5] M. Tuncbilek, H. Goker, R. Ertan, R. Eryigit, E. Kendi, N. Altanlar, Arch. Pharm.
(weinheim, Ger.), 330 (1997) 372.
[6] Y. Maki, H. Kimoto, S. Fujii, H. Muramatsu, N. Hirata, K. Kamoshita, T. Yano, M.
Hirano, [Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho JP 01, 135 (1989) 773 (89, 135, 773)]; C.A., 112
(1990) 7485.
[7] W. Lunkenteimer, B. Baasner, F. Lieb, C. Erdelen, J. Hartwig, U. Wachendroff-
Newmann, W. Stendel, V. Goergens, [Ger. Offen. DE 4, 237 (1994) 548]; C.A.,
122 (1995) 160636.
[8] J. L. Miessel, [U.S. 4, 000 (1976) 295], C.A., 86 (1977) 140050.
[9] X. Hansheng, F. Zice, L. Xiufang, S. Yaojun, Z. Baixin, Wuhan Dauxe Xuebao, Ziran
Kexueban.; 71 (1990), C.A., 114 (1991) 62369.
[10] S.E. Lazer, R.M. Matteo, J.G. Possanza, J. Med. Chem. 30 (1987) 726.
[11] Z. Ejmocki, Z. Ochal, [Pol. PL 139m (1987) 912]; C.A., 109 (1988) 73428.
[12] H.M.F. Madkour, A.A. Farag, S.Sh. Ramses, N.A. Ibrahim, Phosphorus, Sulfur
Silicon 181 (2006) 255.
[13] D.M. Tremblay, B.G. Talbot, O. Garisse, Plant Dis. 87 (2003) 570.
[14] F.A. Cotton, G. Wilkinson, C.A. Murillo, M. Bochmann, Advanced Inorganic
Chemistry, Sixth ed., Wiley, New York, 1999.
[15] M.K. Koley, S.C. Sivasubramanian, B. Varghese, P.T. Manoharan, A.P. Koley, Inorg.
Chim. Acta 361 (2008) 1485.
[16] G.G. Mohamed, Z.H. Abd, El. Wahwb, J. Thermal Anal. 73 (2003) 347.
[17] M.M. Omar, G.G. Mohamed, Spectrochim. Acta (Part A) 61 (2005) 929.
[18] G.G. Mohamed, N.E.A. El-Gamel, F.A. NourEl-Dien, Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org.
Chem. 31 (2001) 347.
3.3. Formulation
The main technique is used to apply the active ingredients of
pesticides in the field. Beside the ability of formulation to spread
the small amount of active ingredient over a large area, it also
improves its pesticidal activity in the field. Depending on the
physico-chemical properties of the active ingredient as well as the
type of pest, we should select the type of formulation. In this work
we formulated the cobalt complex in the form of 25% wettable
powder (25% WP). The local formulation passed successfully the
required tests according to the standard method [25]. The compo-
nents of the formulation are listed as follows:
The active ingredient (Co-complex)
Anionic surfactant
Dispersing agent
Antifoaming agent
Carrier
25.00%
20.00%
4.00%
1.00%
50.00%
100%
w/w
w/w
w/w
w/w
w/w
w/w
Total
[19] J. Kohout, M. Hvastijova, J. Kozisek, J.G. Diaz, M. Valko, L. Jager, I. Svoboda, Inorg.
Chim. Acta 287 (1999) 186.
[20] G.G. Mohamed, N.E.A. El-Gamel, F. Teixidor, Polyhedron 20 (2001) 2689.
[21] A.A. Soliman, G.G. Mohamed, Thermochim. Acta 421 (2004) 151.
[22] M.A. Zayed, F.A. Nour El-Dien, G.G. Mohamed, N.E.A. El-Gamel, J. Mol. Struct.
841 (2007) 41.
we evaluated its activity against the same fungi and compared it
with the commercially used fungicide (Monceren 25% WP) by using
different ranges of dilutions.
From data in Table 6 it is evident that the inhibition activity
of the formulation, to the fungi mycelial growth, increases as the
concentration increases. The EC50 values of the new formulation
are 90.94, 207.52, 208.23 ppm but that of the standard fungicide are
2467.70, 48.50, 2309.18 ppm on F. solani, R. solani and S. rolfesii fungi,
[23] A.W. Coats, J.P. Redfern, Nature 20 (1964) 68.
[24] C.M. Thimmaiah, G.T. Chadrappa, W.D. Lloyd, Inorg. Chim. Acta 107 (1985)
281.
[25] FAO and WHO joint meeting on pesticides specifications (JMPS(, [Manual on
Development and Use of FAO and WHO Specifications for Pesticides], Rome,
2006.