18
J. Ren et al. / Thermochimica Acta 582 (2014) 17–24
Table 1
Crystallographic data for I, II and III.
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Crystal system
Space group
a/nm
C12H12N4O3(I)
260.26
Monoclinic
P2 1/n
C12H12N4O3·H2O(II)
C15H12N4O2·CH3OH(III)
278.27
312.33
Monoclinic
P2 1/n
4.8068(15)
Monoclinic
P2 1/c
8.9110(12)
25.225(16)
b/nm
8.104(5)
12.503(4)
12.8341(17)
c/nm
27.848(14)
90
122.02(4)
90
4827(5)
16
1.433
21.707(7)
90
94.508(6)
90
1300.5(7)
4
1.421
14.313(2)
90
106.969(2)
90
1567.7(4)
4
1.325
˛/(◦)
ˇ/(◦)
ꢁ/(◦)
Volume/nm3
Z
Density (calculated)/(mg m−3
Crystal size/mm
)
0.34 × 0.25 × 0.15
0.37 × 0.28 × 0.20
0.35 × 0.26 × 0.18
ꢂ range for data collection
Reflections collected/unique
Goodness-of-fit on F2
0.95–25.10
1.88–25.10
2.18–25.09
22,994/8556 [R(int) = 0.1168]
1.081
6378/2310 [R(int) = 0.0421]
1.041
7619/2788[R(int) = 0.0205]
1.033
Final R indices [I ≥ 2ꢃ(I)]
R1 = 0.1765, wR2 = 0.5259
R1 = 0.2469, wR2 = 0.5777
R1 = 0.0502, wR2 = 0.1084
R1 = 0.0800, wR2 = 0.1242
R1 = 0.0406, wR2 = 0.1153
R1 = 0.0500, wR2 = 0.1243
R indices (all data)
and treated with 80% hydrazine hydrate (5.00 mL). The mixture was
stirred and heated at 80 ◦C on a water bath for 4 h. After the night,
white crystals were collected by filtration, washed with nonaque-
ous alcohol and dried. Yield: 39.0%, m.p. 204–205 ◦C.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Crystal structures of compounds I–III
tice system in the centrosymmetric P2 1/n, space group with Z = 16,
4 and 4, respectively. In compound I, the asymmetric unit contains
four molecules. The perspective views of the molecular structures
of three compounds are represented in Figs. 1–3. From Fig. 1, it can
be seen that this molecular has a 5-member ring and a 6-member
ring. The band length of O(3) C(9) is 1.222 nm, which is the typ-
ical C O double bond. It indicates that the compound includes a
keto group. The N(1) C(8) (1.267 nm) is shorter than the N(2) C(9)
(1.427 nm), showing there is a typical C N double bond between
C(8) and N(1). The dihedral angle of N(2) N(1) C(8) C(6) is 171.7◦
and N(1) N(2) C(9) C(10) is 172.8◦, indicating that the 5-member
ring and the 6-member ring are not in the same plane. The crys-
tal structure of I shown in Fig. 4 is stabilized by weak interaction
of intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen bonds. There are
three kinds of hydrogen bonds: N H. . .O, O H. . .N and O H. . .O
between one molecule and the adjacent layer which make the crys-
tal structure more stable.
2.2.2. Synthesis of acyl hydrazones
A solution of 2-hydroxy-3-methoxy-benzaldehyde (0.0760 g,
0.50 mmol) in methanol (5.00 mL) was added to a solution of
1H-imidazole-4-carboxylic acid hydrazide in methanol (5.00 mL).
After heating for 3 h on the water bath at 70 ◦C, the color of
reaction mixture changed from colorless transparent to yellow.
The resultant solution of 1H-imidazole-4-carboxylic acid (2-
hydroxy-3-methoxy-benzylidene)-hydrazone (compound I) was
left unperturbed to allow for slow evaporation of the solvent. Yel-
low single crystals, suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis, were
formed after a week.
hydrazone (compound II) and 1H-imidazole-4-carboxylic acid (2-
hydroxy-naphthalen-1-ylmethylene)-hydrazone (compound III).
The synthesis routes of the compounds are summarized by
Scheme 1.
3.2. Thermal behaviors
Compound I: Yield: 47.5%, m.p. 247–248 ◦C. Anal. calcd for
C
12H12N4O3: C 55.39, H 4.62, N 21.54; found C 54.88, H 4.70, N
22.24.
Compound II: Yield: 69.0%, m.p. 226–228 ◦C. Anal. calcd for
nitrogen
The TG curves of three compounds under nitrogen at the heat-
15 ◦C min−1 are shown in Figs. 6–8. The main thermal decomposi-
tion processes under nitrogen for three compounds are described
in Fig. 9.
C12H12N4O3·H2O: C 51.80, H 5.04, N 20.14; found C 52.03, H 5.12,
N 20.99.
Compound III: Yield: 70.4%, m.p. 253–254 ◦C. Anal. calcd for
C15H12N4O2·CH3OH: C 61.54, H 5.13, N 17.95; found C 62.03, H
5.20, N 17.33.
major stage of weight loss during 30–800 ◦C, and the endother-
mic peak is in the temperature of 325.98 ◦C at the heating rate of
15 ◦C min−1. The value of the weight loss at this stage is 49.63%
(Calcd. 47.83%), and the lost group is shown in Fig. 9. In Figs. 5 and 7,
two stages of weight loss of compound II can be clearly discerned
under the heating rate of 15 ◦C min−1. The first step starts from
be assigned to one lattice water (Calcd. 6.47%). The second stage
occurred at 306.46 ◦C with the mass loss of 43.09% (Calcd. 44.56%),
which is shown in Fig. 9. In the TG and DTG curves of compound
III, as described in Figs. 5 and 8, two mass loss stages are observed.
The decomposition of III starts at 109 ◦C and ends at 148 ◦C with a
2.3. X-ray crystallography
The crystal data and the cell parameters for I–III are given in
Table 1. The structures were solved with direct methods using the
program SHELXS-97 and refined by full-matrix least-squares meth-
ods against F2 using the program SHELXL-97 [27]. The hydrogen
atoms were fixed at calculated position, and their positions were
refined with a riding model. The non-hydrogen atoms were located
with difference Fourier synthesis and hydrogen atoms were gener-
ated geometrically. The largest residual peak and hole in the final
difference Fourier diagram have no chemical significance.