Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 75, No. 12, 20 September 1999
Chen et al.
1729
FIG. 4. AFM image of the C54 TiSi2 phase produced by laser annealing
͑left͒ and RTA ͑right͒, the average grain size is measured to be 85 and 110
nm, respectively.
FIG. 5. Scanning speed ͑mm/s͒ dependence of silicide thickness.
We have performed computer simulation on the tempo-
ral distributions of temperature during laser irradiation. The
maximum temperature at the Ti–Si interface is about
1100 °C during laser treatment, which is well below the
melting points of Ti ͑1660 °C͒ and Si ͑1412 °C͒. The results
indicate that the solid-state process is responsible for the C54
TiSi2 formation in our experiments rather than melting. The
extremely fast ramping rate and the short duration of the
laser pulses, together with the fact that the samples do not
melt, make it possible to form fine grains and the atomic-
scale smooth interface. In this case, the short duration of the
pulses limits the growth of silicide grains.
The reaction kinetics has been examined in our experi-
ments. For the reaction-limited ͑RL͒ film formation process,
the film thickness is proportional to the annealing time, while
it is proportional to the square root of the annealing time for
the diffusion-limited ͑DL͒ process. In our experiments, the
film thickness is expected to be inversely proportional, re-
spectively, to the scanning speed and to its square root for
the two cases. In Fig. 5 the solid line is a least square fit
͑LSF͒ of the experimental data with the imposed condition
that the fitted line goes through the origin. The dashed line is
the result calculated from the diffusion-limited formation us-
ing the preexponential factor U0ϭ29 cm2/s and activation
energy Eaϭ1.8 eV.15 In this calculation, the film thickness
formed by one pulse was obtained by integrating the tem-
perature profile, which is obtained by computer simulation.
The calculated result is very close to the experimental data,
considering the fact that there are no adjustable parameters in
the calculation.
We have also attempted to fit the experimental data us-
ing the reaction-limited model. As there are no data on U0
and Ea available for TiSi2 in the reaction-limited case, we
have simply fitted the experimental data to a linear function
of time, which also has to go through the origin. The fitted
result is also plotted in Fig. 5 as the dotted line. Our results
clearly favor the diffusion-limited mechanism.
It has to be pointed out here that the laser-annealed
samples contain cracks of 1–10 m spacing, which leads to
the unreliability of the electrical measurement data ͑not
shown͒. There are two types of stresses which may be re-
sponsible for the cracks:16 ͑1͒ the intrinsic stress due to the
26% shrink in volume after silicidation, which induces
stresses with the substrate and with the surrounding unsili-
cided area; and ͑2͒ the extrinsic stress caused by the differ-
ence in the thermal expansion coefficients between silicide
͑12.5 ppm/°C͒ and Si ͑3 ppm/°C͒. The elimination of the
cracks induced by the laser annealing will be a giant step
toward the realization of its application in semiconductor
manufacturing.
In summary, direct formation of C54 TiSi2 has been
achieved with a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser, using industrial
standard Ti/Si samples without preamorphization of the c-Si
substrate, via a solid-state diffusion mechanism. The C54
TiSi2 films formed are single phased and thin, with fine
grains and a smooth film/substrate interface on the atomic
scale. Laser-induced formation of titanium silicide and other
materials may find applications in the subquarter micron
technology.
1 R. T. Tung, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 1993 ͑1996͒.
2 V. Vraciun, D. Craciun, N. Chitica, I. N. Mihailescu, L. C. Nistor, A. L.
Popa, V. S. Teodorescu, I. Ursu, A. V. Kuzmichev, V. I. Konov, A. M.
Prokhorov, G. Leggieri, A. Luches, and M. Martino, J. Phys. D 22, 1500
͑1992͒.
3 A. Mouroux and S.-L. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 975 ͑1996͒.
4 J. B. Lasky, J. S. Nakos, O. J. Cain, and P. J. Geiss, IEEE Trans. Electron
Devices ED-38, 262 ͑1991͒.
5 I. De Wolf, D. J. Howard, A. Lauwers, K. Maex, and H. E. Maes, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 70, 2262 ͑1997͒.
6 Z. Ma and L. H. Allen, Phys. Rev. B 49, 13501 ͑1994͒.
7 H. Kuwano, J. R. Philips, and J. W. Mayer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 440
͑1990͒.
8 R. T. Tung, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 402, 101 ͑1996͒.
9 Y. H. Ku, S. K. Lee, D. K. Shih, D. L. Kong, C. O. Lee, and J. R.
Yeargain, Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 877 ͑1988͒.
10 V. Cracium, D. Cracium, N. Chitica, I. N. Mihailescu, L. C. Nistor, A. L.
Popa, V. S. Teodorescu, I. Ursu, A. V. Kuzmichev, V. I. Konov, A. M.
Prokhorov, G. Leggieri, A. Luches, and M. Martinos, J. Phys. D 25, 1500
͑1992͒.
11 E. D’Anna, G. Leggieri, and A. Luches, Thin Solid Films 218, 95 ͑1992͒.
12 E. D’Anna, G. Leggieri, A. Luches, M. Martino, and A. Perrone, Appl.
Surf. Sci. 54, 353 ͑1992͒.
13 N. Shamma, S. Talwar, G. Verma, K.-J. Kramer, N. Farrar, C. Chi, W.
Greene, and K. Weiner, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 470, 265 ͑1997͒.
14 R. J. Nemanich, R. W. Fiordalice, and H. Jeon, IEEE J. Quantum Elec-
tron. 25, 997 ͑1989͒.
15 V. E. Borisenko and P. J. Hesketh, Rapid Thermal Processing of Semi-
conductors ͑Plenum, New York, 1997͒.
16 S. P. Murarka, Silicides for VLSI Applications ͑Academic, New York,
1983͒.
152.23.46.217 On: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 04:18:24