C O MMU N I C A T I O N S
of total Pd content in the system) by ICP-AES, which showed
almost no leaching of Pd metal from catalysts B and C in the liquid
phase during reactions. The filtrates also showed no hydrocarboxy-
lation activity, when tested without any addition of fresh catalysts.
The catalysts were found to be very stable, restoring high activity
and selectivity even after three recycles, as has been presented for
hydrocarboxylation of styrene with catalysts B and C (see Sup-
porting Information, Figures 4 and 5). Comparison of catalysts B
and B-3 (recycle 3 with catalyst B) analyzed by 31P CP MAS NMR
(Figure 1-c), showed no change in δiso values. Thus, the geometry
of the Pd-pyca anchored inside the MCM-41 remains intact even
after the third recycle. This observation provides evidence that
complex A is encapsulated inside the mesopores and does not leach
out under reaction conditions. In contrast to this, the catalyst
prepared by anchoring the complex A on silica gel as a support
showed a considerable amount of leaching of Pd metal (∼15%)
during reaction (similar to that observed by Fraile et al. for
epoxidation reactions ). The anchored Pd catalysts in MCM-41
and MCM-48 reported here represent the first case of true
heterogeneous Pd catalysts for hydrocarboxylation of aryl olefins
and alcohols.
Figure 1. 31P CP MAS NMR chemical shifts of (a) Pd-pyca complex, (b)
Pd-pyca-MCM-41 before reaction, (c) Pd-pyca-MCM-41 after 3rd recycle,
at 500 MHz (* in NMR patterns denote sidebands at 8 kHz).
as exterior walls of MCM-41 (see Supporting Information, Figure
2
B and C). Catalyst C, as an example, was chosen for X-ray
photoelectron spectra (XPS), which showed typical Pd(II) oxidation
state (Pd 3d5/2 ) 337.0 eV, Pd 3d3/2 ) 343.0 eV) and no cluster
formation of Pd metal in the catalyst (see Supporting Information,
Figure 3 and Table 2). FT-IR of the catalysts B and C showed
9a
-
1
-1
both the stretching vibrations at 1329 cm (νOdC-O) and 1669 cm
-
1
(ν
CdO), similar to those of complex A (1330 and 1668 cm
respectively). The Pd-N stretching frequencies of catalysts B and
C at 564 cm (νPd-N) varied from that of complex A (νPd-N
68 cm ), which reflects a possible coordination between NAPTS
and Pd-atom. P CP MAS NMR of catalysts A and B (Figure 1 a
and b) showed only one major 31P signal (δiso ) 33.13 ppm) for
Acknowledgment. K.M. and B.R.S. thank Council of Scientific
and Industrial Research (CSIR), India for fellowships. We thank
Dr. S. Ganapathy, Dr. A. B. Mandale, and Mr. A. Ghosh for their
help in characterizations.
5d
-
1
)
-
1 5d
5
31
Supporting Information Available: Syntheses, powder-XRD,
TEM, FT-IR, XPS data, and recycle-runs of Pd-pyca-MCM-41 (B)
and Pd-pyca-MCM-48 (C) (PDF). This material is available free of
charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
complex A, as envisaged from the structure, while that of catalyst
B has a shifted 31P signal (δiso ) 17.968 ppm). We presume APTS
(
tethered inside the mesopore walls) when anchored with Pd-pyca
complex donates an electron pair from NAPTS to the Pd atom
Scheme 1). This in turn increases the electron density on the P
atom of PPh by dπ (P) T dπ (Pd) bonding. This is consistent
References
(
(
1) (a) Colquhoun, H. M.; Thompson, D. J.; Twigg, M. V. Carbonylation:
Direct Synthesis of Organic Compounds; Plenum: New York, 1991. (b)
Beller, M.; Bolm, C. Transition Metals for Organic Synthesis; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, 1998. (c) Rieu, J. P.; Boucherle, A.; Cousse, H.;
Mouzin, G. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 4095. (d) Wu, G. G.; Wong, Y.; Poirier,
M. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 745. (e) Beller, M.; Eckert, M.; Geissler, H.,
Napierski, B.; Rebenstock, H. P.; Holla, E. W. Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4,
3
with the results of FT-IR analysis.
The hydrocarboxylation experiments were carried out using
catalysts A, B, and C in a stirred high-pressure reactor. (Carbon-
ylation reactions are very hazardous because of handling with CO
gas at high pressures and temperatures; hence, we suggest extreme
precautions and proper guidance while performing reactions.) The
9
35. (f) Imada, Y.; Alper, H. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6766. (g) Pisano,
C.; Consiglio, G.; Sironi, A.; Moret, M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
991, 421.
1
(
2) (a) Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with Organometallic Compounds;
Cornils, B., Herrmann, W. A., Eds.; VCH: Weinheim, 1996; Vols. 1 and
2. (b) Sheldon, R. A. Chem. Ind. 1992, 903.
details of the procedure followed were similar to those described
in our previous report.5d The reaction mixtures and products were
(
3) Armor, J. N. Appl. Catal. 1991, 78, 141.
analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) to determine conversion,
selectivity, and turnover frequency (TOF). The results on hydro-
carboxylation of styrene, substituted styrenes as well as p-
isobutylphenylethanol (IBPE), using these catalysts are presented
in Table 1. The results showed almost complete conversion (>95%)
of all the substrates with a regioselectivity >98% for the desired
(
4) Elango, V.; Davenport, K. G.; Murphy, M. A.; Mott, G. N.; Zey, E. G.;
Smith, B. L.; Moss, G. L. Eur. Pat. 400892, 1990.
(
5) (a) Seayad, A.; Kelkar, A. A.; Chaudhari, R. V. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal.
1998, 113, 883. (b) Seayad, A.; Jayasree, S.; Chaudhari, R. V. Catal.
Lett. 1999, 61, 99. (c) Chaudhari, R. V.; Jayasree, S.; Seayad, A. M. U.S.
Patent 6,093,847, 2000. (d) Jayasree, S.; Seayad, A.; Chaudhari, R. V.
Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 203. (e) del Rio, I.; Ruiz, N.; Claver, C.; van der
Veen, L. A.; van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000,
1
61, 39.
2
-arylpropanoic acids. The TOF values for the anchored catalysts
(
6) (a) Davies, I. W.; Matty, L.; Hughes, D. L.; Reider, P. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 10139. (b) Jayasree, S.; Seayad, A.; Chaudhari, R. V.
Chem. Commun. 1999, 1067.
-
1
-1
were in the range of 415-465 h for styrene and 435-450 h
for IBPE as substrates, respectively. Catalysts B and C show almost
similar TOFs, which may be due to similar rates of interaction of
the substrate molecules and the Pd atom residing inside the
mesoporous matrices. Although the TOF values are lower for
anchored catalysts compared to that for the homogeneous complex
(
7) (a) Lee, C. W.; Alper, H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 250. (b) Jang, E. J.;
Lee, K. H.; Lee, J. S.; Kim, Y. G. J. Mol. Catal. 1999, 144, 431.
(8) (a) Kresge, C. T.; Leonowicz, M. E.; Roth, W. J.; Vertulli, J. C.; Beck,
J. S. Nature 1992, 359, 710.
(
9) (a) Fraile, J. M.; Garcia, J. I.; Mayoral, J. A.; Vispe, E.; Brown, D. R.;
Naderi, M. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1510. (b) Pauwels, B.; van Tendeloo,
G.; Thoelen, C.; van Rhijn, W.; Jacobs, P. A. AdV. Mater. 2001, 13, 1317.
-
1
catalyst A (TOF ) 800-2600 h ), these heterogeneous catalysts
are easier to separate and reuse in practice.
(
10) Shephard, D. S.; Zhou, W.; Maschmeyer, T.; Matters, J. M.; Caroline L.
Roper, C. L.; Parsons, S.; Johnson, B. F. G.; Duer, M. J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2719.
To prove the stability of these catalysts, hot reaction-mixture
-
4
filtrates were analyzed for Pd content (0.7 ppm, ∼3.5 × 10
%
JA025991Q
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 124, NO. 33, 2002 9693