LETTER
Iodine in Dichloromethane – A Simple Method for Selective Cleavage of Prenyl Ethers
1991
Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 1589. (e) Jarowicki, K.;
Kocienski, P. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 2495.
(3) (a) Rudinger, J. Pure Appl. Chem. 1963, 7, 335. (b) Patek,
M. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1993, 42, 97.
(4) (a) Rao, G. V.; Reddy, D. S.; Mohan, G. H.; Iyengar, D. S.
Synth. Commun. 2000, 30, 3565. (b) Kamal, A.; Laxman,
E.; Rao, N. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 371; and
references cited therein.
(5) See for examples: (a) Nakayama, K.; Uoto, K.; Higashi, K.;
Soga, T.; Kusama, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40, 1718.
(b) Lüning, J.; Möller, U.; Debski, N.; Welzel, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 5871.
(6) (a) Gigg, R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1980, 738;
(t-BuOK, DMSO, 50 °C). (b) Sharma, G. V. M.; Ilangovan,
A.; Mahalingam, A. K. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 9103;
(Yb(OTf)3 cat., CH3NO2, r. t.). (c) Tsuritani, T.; Shinokubo,
H.; Oshima, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8121; (TiCl4, n-
Bu4NI).
and 2), benzyl (entry 2), acetate (entry 8), t-butyldiphenyl-
silyl (entry 10) groups and a conjugated ketone (entry 5).
Unfortunately, even in the presence of sieves, the O-pre-
nyl group could not be removed selectively in the pres-
ence of a t-butyldimethlysilyl group (entry 9). In the case
of compound 1g, containing an allyl group, the desired
compound 2g was obtained along with the product of ad-
dition of iodine to the double bond of the allyl group (ratio
1/3 in favor of the vic-diiodo compound). Anyhow, treat-
ment of a mixture of these two compounds with zinc in hot
ethanol gave exclusively 2g in good yield (entry 7).
Another interesting feature of this method is that reaction
of iodine to the aryl prenyl ether 1k led to the 3-iodo chro-
man derivative 2k in moderate yield. Mechanistic aspects
of this transformation have not been investigated yet but a
plausible pathway may start by a [1,3]-sigmatropic rear-
rangement with formation of an o-prenyl phenol11 fol-
lowed by an electrophilic cyclization. 3-Iodo-2,2-
dimethylchroman derivatives are precursor of 2,2-dimeth-
ylchromenes, a very common structural motif in fla-
vanoids.12
(7) Cossy, J.; Albouy, A.; Scheloske, M.; Gomez Pardo, D.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 1539.
(8) Prenyl ethers were prepared according to the procedure
described by Gigg in ref.6a.
(9) I2 in methanol is known as a good reagent for selective
cleavage of acetals. See:Szarek, W. A.; Zamojski, A.;
Tiwari, K. N.; Ison, E. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 3827.
(10) General Experimental Procedure. For entries 4–8, 11: To
a stirred solution of the prenyl ether (0.5 mmol) in
dichloromethane (5 mL), cooled to 10 °C for entries 5 and 7
and 0 °C for entry 6, was added iodine [(0.19 g, 1.5 equiv),
(0.38 g for entry 5)]. The progress of the reaction was
monitored by TLC. Upon consumption of the prenyl ether,
the solution was diluted with dichloromethane, washed
successively with 20% Na2S2O3 solution, sat. NaHCO3
solution, water, dried (Na2SO4), concentrated in vacuo and
purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel to
yield the desired product which gave satisfactory
spectroscopic and analytical data consistent with its
structure. For entries 1–3, 9–10: To a stirred solution of the
prenyl ether (0.5 mmol) in dichloromethane (6 mL) were
successively added 3Å powdered molecular sieves (0.15 g),
iodine (0.19 g, 1.5 equiv), (0.38 g for entry 3). After
consumption of the prenyl ether, the reaction mixture was
treated as in the first experimental procedure to give the pure
desired compound.
In conclusion, the use of iodine in dichloromethane pro-
vides a mild and efficient means of removing prenyl
ethers in the presence of a number of other functionalities.
Studies of the mechanism of this cleavage of prenyl ethers
as well as of other cleavage techniques are currently un-
derway.
References
(1) Monographs: (a) Kocienski, P. J. Protecting Groups;
Thieme: Stuttgart, 1994. (b) Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M.
Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.; John
Wiley: New York, 1999. (c) Hanson, J. R. Protecting
Groups in Organic Synthesis; Sheffield Academic Press:
Sheffield, 1999.
(2) Reviews: (a) Kunz, H.; Waldmann, H. Protecting Groups,
In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 6; Trost, B. M.,
Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991, 631. (b) Ziegler, T.
Protecting Group Strategies for Carbohydrates, In
Carbohydrate Chemistry; Booms, G. J., Ed.; Blackie
Academic and Professional: Glasgow, 1998, 21.
(c) Jarowicki, K.; Kocienski, P. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1998, 4005. (d) Jarowicki, K.; Kocienski, P. J. J.
(11) For an example of such a rearrangement see: Dauben, W. G.;
Cogen, J. M.; Behar, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 3241.
(12) The Handbook of Natural flavanoids, Vol. 1 and 2;
Harborne, J. B.; Baxter, B., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons:
England, 1991.
Synlett 2001, No. 12, 1989–1991 ISSN 0936-5214 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York