L. Tom, M.R.P. Kurup
Journal of Solid State Chemistry xxx (xxxx) xxx
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the design and construction of CP-Cd. (a) Structural formula of H2DDIH and binding sites, (b) pictorial representation of the ligand and (c)
self-assembly formation of CP-Cd.
heterocyclic compounds of biological significance [25,26]. The reaction
is generally catalyzed by weak soluble bases in super-stoichiometric
amounts. To address the problems of recyclability and high loading
common with homogeneous base catalysts, efficient and recyclable solid
base catalyst systems such as amine-functionalized mesoporous zirconia,
cation-exchanged zeolites, chitosan hydrogel, amine-functionalized
superparamagnetic nanoparticles, etc. have been utilized for these reac-
tion [27–30]. However, most of these currently used methods suffer from
one disadvantage or another which include, high-power microwaves,
tedious preparation procedures, high reaction temperature as well as the
use of toxic metals. Therefore, further development of new types of
catalysts based on cheap and environmentally tolerable metal complexes
that could be easily recyclable and could show high efficiency under mild
conditions is desirable.
Calcd for H2DDIH: C, 69.63; H, 4.49; N, 18.74%. Found: C, 69.92; H,
4.68; N, 18.93%.
2.3. Synthesis of [Cd(DDIH)2H2O]n (CP–Cd)
A solid mixture of cadmium acetate dihydrate, Cd(OAc)2⋅2H2O,
(0.266 g, 1 mmol) and, 12-diphenylethane-1,2-dione bisisonicotinylhy-
drazone (H2DDIH) (0.896, 2 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of DMF/THF
(3:1 v/v) mixture. The solution was then heated to 80 ꢁC for 45 min and
cooled to room temperature. The mother liquor was kept for slow
evaporation. After 5 days orange crystals were collected with a yield of
26% (0.156 g). Anal. Calcd. for C26H20CdN6O3: C, 54.13; H, 3.49; N,
14.57%. Found: C, 53.91; H, 3.62; N, 14.27%. IR spectrum (cmꢀ1): 3442
s, 1625 m, 1607 m, 1562 m, 1382 s, 1233 w, 1045 w, 710 m.
In the present paper, we wish to report the application of a Cd(II)
MOF from a flexible dihydrazone linker as an efficient heterogeneous
catalyst for the room temperature liquid phase Knoevenagel reaction.
Detailed characterization of the MOF using various analytical methods,
crystal structure, TG, PXRD, SEM etc. has also been performed. The
catalyst stability was also ascertained by performing leaching and reus-
ability experiments and a plausible mechanism has been proposed.
2.4. X-ray crystallography
Crystallographic data were collected with a Bruker SMART APEX II
diffractometer with graphite monochromated Mo-K
α (λ ¼ 0.71073 Å) X-
ray source. The unit cell dimensions were measured and the data col-
lections were performed at 296 K. Bruker SMART software was used for
data acquisition and Bruker SAINT Software for data integration [31].
Absorption corrections were carried out using SADABS based on Laue
symmetry using equivalent reflections [32]. The structure was solved by
direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares on F [2],
including all reflections with the SHELXL-2018/3 software package [33].
All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement
parameters and positions of hydrogen atoms were located in the differ-
ence Fourier maps and were placed in calculated positions with isotropic
displacement parameters set to 1.2Ueq of the attached atom (1.5 for Me).
The studied crystal was refined as a two-component twin and the twin
data refinement was subsequently carried out with a scale factor of BASF
¼ 0.2927. The site-occupancy factors [0.501 (6)/0.499 (6)] for the
disordered atoms were refined using one common parameter. Their
displacement parameters were refined using SIMU and DELU restraints
and EADP instruction was used for the dummy atoms constrains. The
possibility of spurious bonds was eliminated by PART instructions. All
the drawings were made using, Diamond 3.2 k and Mercury 3.10.2 [34,
35]. The crystallographic data, refinement parameters, bond lengths and
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and methods
All reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial sources
and were used without further purification. CHN analyses were done
using an Elementar Vario EL III elemental analyzer. IR spectra were
recorded using a KBr pellet method on a JASCO FT-IR-5300 Spectrometer
in the 4000-400 cmꢀ1 region. TGA analysis was carried out using a
PerkinElmer STA6000/8000 under flowing nitrogen from 35 to 400 ꢁC at
a heating rate of 10 ꢁC/min. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) data were
collected using a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer system with Cu-K
α
radiation. BET experiment was carried out using a Belsorp-mini II in-
strument (BEL Sorp II, Japan). Before the sorption experiment, sample
was activated at 100 ꢁC overnight. Solid state UV–Vis spectra were
recorded using an Ocean Optics USB-4000 spectrometer and BaSO4 as a
reference. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) micrographs were
recorded using a JEOL Model JSM-6390LV instrument. Gas chromatog-
raphy was conducted using an Agilent 7890-GC instrument using a flame
ionization detector.
2.5. Catalytic studies
2.2. Synthesis of H2DDIH (1,2-diphenylethane-1,2-dione
bisisonicotinylhydrazone)
The condensation reaction of benzaldehyde derivatives and malono-
nitrile was performed in a 10 mL beaker equipped with a magnetic
stirrer. For each reaction, a benzaldehyde derivative (1.0 mmol), malo-
nonitrile (1.1 mmol), MeOH (5 mL), and a MOF catalyst (3 mol%) were
placed in the 10 mL beaker. Then, the reaction mixture was stirred with a
magnetic stirring bar at 400 rpm at room temperature. The reaction was
monitored periodically by analyzing the sample by GC until completion
of the reaction. The percentage conversion and selectivity were
Isonicotinic acid hydrazide (0.274 g, 2 mmol) was added to 20 mL
DMF solution of 1,2-diphenylethane-1,2-dione (0.420 g, 1 mmol). The
mixture was heated under stirring for 2 h at 60 ꢁC. The white crystalline
product obtained after slow evaporation of the solution was washed and
dried in vacuum. C26H20N6O2 (H2DDIH); Yield ¼ 54% (0.246 g). Anal.
2