Reduction of Copper Oxides with Carbon Monoxide
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 108, No. 36, 2004 13673
be described by a single nth-order expression over the entire
range of reaction.
Acknowledgment. The research carried out at the Chemistry
Department of Brookhaven National Laboratory was financed
through contract DE-AC02-98CH10086 with the U.S. Depart-
ment of Energy (DOE, Division of Chemical Sciences). A.I.F.
acknowledges support by the U.S. Department of Energy Grant
No. DE-FG02- 03ER15477. The authors would like to thank
Avital Merl and Pesia Soloveichik for their help in XAS data
collection and processing. The National Synchrotron Light
Source is supported by the Divisions of Materials and Chemical
Sciences in the Office of Basic Energy Sciences at DOE.
References and Notes
(1) Kummer, J. T. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1980, 6, 177.
(2) Huang, T. J.; Yu, T.-C. Appl. Catal. 1991, 71, 275.
(3) Klier, K. AdV. Catal. 1982, 31, 243.
(4) Newsome, D. S. Catal. ReV. 1980, 21 (2), 275.
(5) PDF #41-0254, JCPDS Powder Diffraction File; Int. Center For
Diffraction Data: Swarthmore, PA, 1989.
Figure 11. Proposed mechanism for the CuO reduction in CO gas.
(6) PDF #05-0667, JCPDS Powder Diffraction File; Int. Center For
a substantial amount of extra oxygen moving around the free
spaces of the oxide lattice. Further reduction with CO would
produce metallic copper (D f E). The metallic copper starts to
form from the surface of the Cu2O particles, and gradually
becomes thicker. As the layer of Cu becomes thicker, it is more
difficult to fully reduce the Cu2O (E f F f G). The full
reduction (G f H) would be facilitated by high temperature.
At different stages of the CuO reduction process, the rate
limiting-step can be different. Initially, it is critical to generate
sites for the adsorption of CO. Once a few of these sites are
available, the removal of O can start (i.e., the creation of more
adsorption sites for CO) and the reaction becomes autocatalytic.
In the following stages, the movement of O from the bulk to
the surface or the nucleation of a phase of metallic copper should
become extremely important. Hence, this gas-solid reaction is
typified by complex kinetics that cannot be described by a single
nth-order expression over the entire process. In fact, we attempted
to fit different portions of the kinetic data in Figures 3 and 8
with a single nth polynomial without obtaining good fittings.
Diffraction Data: Swarthmore, PA, 1989.
(7) O’Keeffe, M.; Bovin, J. O. Am. Mineral. 1978, 63, 180.
(8) PDF #083-1665, JCPDS Powder Diffraction File; Int. Center For
Diffraction Data: Swarthmore, PA, 2004.
(9) O’Keeffe, M.; Moore, W. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1962, 36, 3009.
(10) Huang, T. J.; Tsai, D.-H. Catal. Lett. 2003, 87 (4), 173.
(11) Nagase, K.; Zheng, Y.; Kodama, Y.; Kakuta, J. J. Catal. 1999,
187, 123.
(12) Wang, J. B.; Tsai, D.-H.; Huang, T. J. J. Catal. 2002, 208, 370.
(13) Dow, W.-P.; Huang, T. J. J. Catal. 1994, 147, 322.
(14) (a) Mart´ınez-Arias, A.; Ferna´ndez-Garcia, M.; Ga´lvez, O.; Coro-
nado, J. M.; Anderson, J. A.; Conesa, J. C.; Soria, J.; Munuera, G. J. Catal.
2000, 195, 207. (b) Mart´ınez-Arias, A.; Ferna´ndez-Garc´ıa, M.; Hungr´ıa,
A. B.; Igles¨ias-Juez, A.; Ga´lvez, O.; Anderson, J. A.; Conesa, J. C.; Soria,
J.; Munuera, G. J. Catal. 2003, 214, 261.
(15) Severino, F.; Brito, J. L.; Laine, J.; Fierro, J. L. G.; Lo´pez Agudo,
A. J. Catal. 1998, 177, 82.
(16) Dow, W.-P.; Huang, T. J. J. Catal. 1996, 160, 171.
(17) Liu, W.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. J. Catal. 1995, 153, 317.
(18) Nakamura, J.; Campbell, J. M.; Campbell, C. T. J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 1990, 86, 2725.
(19) Rodriguez, J. A.; Goodman, D. W. Surf. Sci. Reports 1991, 14, 1.
(20) Li, J.-L.; Takeguchi, T.; Inui, T. Appl, Catal. A 1996, 139, 97.
(21) Sadykov, V. A.; Tikhov, S. F. J. Catal. 1997, 165, 279.
(22) Kung, H. H. Transition Metal Oxides: Surface Chemistry and
Catalysis; Elsevier: New York, 1989.
5. Conclusion
(23) Kim, J. Y.; Rodriguez, J. A.; Hanson, J. C.; Frenkel, A. I.; Lee, P.
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10684.
(24) Rodriguez, J. A.; Kim, J. Y.; Hanson, J. C.; Perez, M.; Frenkel, A.
I. Catal. Lett. 2003, 85 (3-4), 247.
(25) Norby, P.; Hanson, J. C. Catal. Today 1998, 39, 301.
(26) Frenkel, A.; Kleifeld, O.; Wasserman, S. R.; Sagi, I. J. Chem. Phys.
2002, 117, 9449.
(27) Chupas, P. J.; Ciraolo, M. F.; Hanson, J. C.; Grey, C. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1694.
(28) Gmelins Handbuch Der Anorganischen Chemie; Kupfer Tell A,
System-Nummer 60, 1955; Verlag Chemie, Gmbh, Weinheim, Bergastrasse.
(29) Hammersely, A. P.; Svensson, S. O.; Thompson, A. Nucl. Instrum.
Methods Phys. Res. 1994, 346, 321.
(30) IDL, Version 5.5; Research System, Inc., 2002.
(31) (a) Larson, A. C.; von Dreele, R. B. GSAS General Structure
Analysis System. Report LAUR 86-748; Los Alamos National Laboratory:
Los Alamos, 1995. (b) Reitveld, A. M. J. Appl. Cryst. 1969, 2, 65.
(32) Frenkel, A. I.; Rehr, J. J. Phys. ReV. B 1993, 48, 585.
(33) Newville, M.; Ravel, B.; Haskel, D.; Rehr, J. J.; Stern, E. A.;
Yacoby, Y.; Physica B 1995, 208 & 209, 154.
The reactions of CuO and Cu2O with CO were investigated
in detail using temperature-programmed reduction (TPR),
synchrotron-based time-resolved X-ray diffraction and X-ray
absorption fine structure techniques. The TPR results showed
that Cu2O reduced at higher temperature than CuO did under
the same operating conditions. A direct transformation pathway
was observed for the isothermal reductions of both CuO and
Cu2O under a large CO supply, while a step pathway with one
intermediate (CuO f Cu2O f Cu) was seen under a limited
CO supply. This was confirmed by both time-resolved X-ray
diffraction and X-ray absorption fine structure techniques. The
formed Cu2O was highly disordered with a substantial amount
of extra oxygen embedded in the lattice. Neither Cu4O3 nor an
amorphous CuOx phase was formed during the reduction of CuO
by CO.
(34) Tsai, D.-H.; Huang, T. J. Appl. Catal., A 2002, 223, 1.
(35) Rodriguez, J. A.; Hanson, J. C.; Frenkel, A. I.; Kim, J.-Y.; Perez,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 346.
(36) Zuo, J. M.; Kim, M.; O’Keeffe, M.; Spence, J. C. H. Nature 1999,
401, 49.
This study illustrates how complex the reduction of a metal
oxide by CO can be. The reduction mechanism can vary
considerably with the experimental conditions (gas flow rate,
temperature, sample size, etc.), and its complex kinetics cannot