SHORT PAPER
Electrochemical Oxidation of Benzoins to Benzils
707
1H NMR (CDCl3): d = 7.0–7.2 (m, 1 H, thienyl), 7.4–7.7 (m, 3 H,
action. Presumably, this is due to the cathodic reaction in
which sodium ions are continuously reduced to sodium
C6H5), 7.7–7.9 (m, 2 H, C6H5), 7.9–8.1 (m, 2 H, thienyl).
that immediately reacts with methanol to give NaOMe 13C NMR (CDCl3): d = 128.88 (CH), 129.78 (CH), 130.10 (CH),
132.63 (C), 134.83 (CH), 136.66 (CH), 136.86 (CH), 139.79 (C),
185.56 (C=O), 192.04 (C=O).
MS: m/z (%) = 216 (M+, 10), 111 (C4H3SCO+, 50), 105 (C6H5CO+,
100), 77 (43), 51 (20), 39(20).
during the course of the electrooxidation, as illustrated in
the lower pathway of Scheme1. The optimal amount of
NaOMe (5 mmol for 8 mmol of benzoins) used herein was
determined separately. Using excessive amounts of
NaOMe (16 mmol or 32 mmol for 8 mmol of benzoins)
did not increase the yield of the products. Furthermore,
the base can also function as an efficient supporting elec-
trolyte (the terminal voltage of the electrolytic cell was al-
ways maintained at less than 10 V).
HRMS: m/z calcd for C12H8O2S: 216.0245; found: 216.0253.
References
(1) (a) Vollhardt, K. P. C.; Schore, N. E. Organic Chemistry,
2nd ed.; Freeman: New York, 1994, 924–929. (b) Smith, L.
I.; Hoehn, H. H. Org. Synth., Coll. Vol. III; Wiley: New
York, 1955, 356. (c) Johnson, J. R.; Grummitt, O. Org.
Synth., Coll. Vol. III; Wiley: New York, 1955, 806.
(d) Cope, A. C.; Smith, D. S.; Cotter, R. J. Org. Synth., Coll.
Vol. IV; Wiley: New York, 1963, 377. (e) Vofsi, D.;
Asscher, M. Org. Synth., Coll. Vol. V; Wiley: New York,
1973, 1076. (f) Morrison, H.; Danishefsky, S.; Yates, P. J.
Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 2617.
In conclusion, by means of an electrochemical method,
the oxidation of benzoins was achieved under very mild
conditions, and without the use of environmentally unde-
sirable reagents. The corresponding benzils were obtained
in moderate to good yields with reasonable current effi-
ciencies in a range of 51% (1e) to 74% (1a). Moreover, the
isolation of the resulting benzils was relatively simple.
(2) Weiss, M.; Apple, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 3666.
(3) Clarke, H. T.; Dreger, E. E. Org. Synth., Coll. Vol. I; Wiley:
New York, 1941, 87.
(4) Cainelli, G.; Cardillo, G. Chromium Oxidants in Organic
Chemistry; Springer: Berlin, 1984.
(5) (a) Iranpoor, N.; Firouzabadi, H.; Zolfigol, M. A. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1998, 71, 905. (b) Tymonko, S. A.; Nattier,
B. A.; Mohan, R. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7657.
(c) Sharma, V. B.; Jain, S. L.; Sain, B. Tetrahedron Lett.
2003, 44, 383. (d) Firouzabadi, H.; Mohammadpour-
Baltork, I. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1992, 65, 1131.
Melting points of the obtained benzils were in fair agreement with
reported values (listed in Table 2). Compound 2n was identified us-
ing its spectral data as described below. The substrates were synthe-
sized according to methods given in the literature.10 All other
reagents were obtained from commercial suppliers and were used
without further purifications.
Electrooxidation of Benzoins 1 to Benzils 2; General Procedure
Preparative-scale electrooxidations were carried out in a tall 50 mL
beaker, equipped with a fine frit cup as the cathode compartment,
an insert cylindrical platinum net (diameter: 32 mm; height: 35 mm;
55 mesh) as the anode, and a nickel coil cathode. A solution of sub-
strate 1a–n (8 mmol), KI (166 mg, 1 mmol), and NaOMe (270 mg,
5 mmol) in MeOH (40 mL) was electrooxidized under a constant
current (0.3 A). During the course of the electrooxidation, the
anolyte was magnetically stirred while maintaining the temperature
of the cell at approximately 15 °C, except for 1d and 1l (30 °C) and
1k (50 °C). After completion of the electrooxidation, the reaction
mixture was concentrated in vacuo at approximately 40 °C to
roughly 1/5th of its original volume, and the resulting solid was col-
lected by filtration and washed with small portions of cold MeOH.
In the cases of 1i,j,m,n, the product was somewhat difficult to so-
lidify, and therefore, the resulting residue was treated with H2O (30
mL), and then extracted with Et2O (3 × 40 mL). The combined ether
extracts were washed with an aq Na2S2O3 solution (20% w/w, 20
mL), and dried (MgSO4). After removal of the solvent, the residue
was purified by distillation under reduced pressure or by recrystal-
lization from small amounts of EtOH.
(e) Mahjoub, A. R.; Ghammami, S.; Kassaee, M. Z.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 4555. (f) Firouzabadi, H.;
Iranpoor, N.; Amani, K. Synthesis 2003, 408. (g) Bhar, S.;
Chaudhuri, S. K. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 3493.
(h) Mitsumoto, Y.; Nitta, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2003, 76,
1029. (i) Shirini, F.; Tajik, H.; Aliakbar, A.; Akbar, A.
Synth. Commun. 2001, 31, 767. (j) Khandekar, A. C.; Paul,
A. M.; Khadikar, B. M. Synth. Commun. 2002, 32, 2931.
(6) (a) Mandal, S. K.; Jensen, D. R.; Pugsley, J. S.; Sigman, M.
S. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4600. (b) Velusamy, S.;
Punniyamurthy, T. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 217. (c) Chang, S.;
Lee, M.; Ko, S.; Lee, P. H. Synth. Commun. 2002, 32, 1279.
(7) For example, see: Torii, S. Electroorganic Synthesis;
Kodansha: Tokyo, 1985.
(8) (a) Chiba, T.; Saitoh, I.; Okimoto, M. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
64, 2516. (b) Chiba, T.; Saitoh, I.; Okimoto, M. Synthesis
1999, 1022. (c) Okimoto, M.; Takahashi, Y. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 2002, 75, 2059. (d) Okimoto, M.; Takahashi, Y.
Synthesis 2002, 2215. (e) Okimoto, M.; Takahashi, Y.;
Kakuchi, T. Synthesis 2003, 2257. (f) Okimoto, M.; Nagata,
Y.; Sueda, S.; Takahashi, Y. Synth. Commun. 2004, 34, 281.
(9) Beilsteins Handbuch der Organischen Chemie, 4th ed.;
Springer: Berlin, 1943.
1-Phenyl-2-(2-thienyl)ethanedione (2n)
Yield: 78%; bp 159–161 °C/2.6 mbar; mp 57–59 °C; fine plates
(EtOH).
IR (KBr): 1670, 1647, 1593, 1408, 1234, 1221, 746, 739, 719, 646
cm–1.
(10) Ide, W. S.; Buck, J. S. Org. React. 1949, 4, 269.
Synthesis 2005, No. 5, 705–707 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York