P. Nshimyumukiza et al. / Tetrahedron 66 (2010) 4515e4520
4519
1487, 1448, 1340, 1225, 910 cmꢁ1; MS (CI) m/z: 220, 219; HRMS
MS (ESI) m/z: 301; HRMS calcd for C18H25N2O2: 301.1916, found:
calcd for C12H17BO3: 220.1265, found: 220.1265.
301.1919.
4.1.6. General procedure for Suzuki coupling (12/2). Tetrakis(tri-
phenylphosphino)palladium (24.9 mg, 0.03 equiv) and imidazole
12 (200 mg, 0.719 mmol, 1 equiv) in dimethoxyethane (2 mL) were
introduced in a microwave tube. Boronic acid (1.1 equiv) in dime-
thoxyethane (2 mL), water (2 mL), and an aqueous solution of
sodium carbonate (20%, 1.2 mL, 3 equiv) were successively added.
The resulting mixture was then degassed for 30 min by means of
a flow of argon and placed in a microwaves oven at 105 ꢂC and
200 W for 1 h. Ethyl acetate (50 mL) and water (25 mL) were added.
The phases were separated and the aqueous phases were extracted
with ethyl acetate (25 mL). The organic phases were combined,
washed with a saturated aqueous solution of NaCl (25 mL), dried
over MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude
product was purified by flash chromatography with cyclohexane/
ethyl acetate 85/15 as eluent.
4.1.11. General procedure for formation of fumaric salts. The imidaz-
ole compound (1 equiv) was dissolved in ethanol (0.1 M). A solution
of fumaric acid (1 equiv) in ethanol (0.05 M) was added. The mix-
ture was stirred overnight and then concentrated under reduced
pressure. The correct 1:1 ratio was checked by 1H NMR.
4.2. Biological assays
Assays have been performed on fumaric salts (see above). Purity
of all tested compounds has been determined by HPLC. Purity is
>98%, unless mentioned otherwise. The Diversity Profile was per-
formedwith 10 mM ofcompound1a byCEREP (France). The Diversity
profile is composed of 71 receptor binding and 16 enzyme assays.
The 87 assay panel is broadly defined with roughly an equal number
of selective, central and peripheral therapeutically relevant targets.
The lists of all targets and their reference ligands used as controls, as
well as experimental conditions, could be obtained at CEREP’s web
site.21 Following the analysis of the data obtained in the first set of
results, all synthesized compounds were analyzed (by CEREP,
France) for their binding activity toward four targets hinted by1a. All
compounds (test and reference) were analyzed in duplicate.
The specific ligand binding to the receptors is defined as the
difference between the total binding and the nonspecific binding
determined in the presence of an excess of unlabeled ligand. The
results are expressed as a percent of control specific binding
((measured specific binding/control specific binding)ꢃ100) and as
a percent inhibition of control specific binding (100ꢁ((measured
specific binding/control specific binding)ꢃ100)) obtained in the
presence of tested compound.
4.1.7. Characterization of 2-(but-3-en-yloxy)-5-[2-(hex-5-en-1-
yloxy)phenyl]-1-methyl-1H-imidazole (2a). Yellow oil; yield:
176 mg (75%); Purity¼91%; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
¼7.33 (td,
d
J¼8.2, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (dd, J¼7.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (dt, J¼7.4, 1.5 Hz,
1H), 6.94 (d, J¼8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.62 (s, 1H), 5.97e5.71 (m, 2H);
5.20e4.94 (m, 4H); 4.46 (t, J¼6.7 Hz, 2H), 3.97 (t, J¼6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.24
(s, 3H), 2.61e2.58 (m, 2H), 2.10e2.03 (m, 2H), 1.79e1.70 (m, 2H),
1.52e1.42 ppm (m, 2H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3):
138.5, 134.4, 132.1, 129.6, 126.6, 121.7, 120.8, 120.0, 117.2, 114.9, 112.2,
d
¼156.9, 153.3,
68.45, 68.41, 33.7, 33.4, 29.5, 28.7, 25.4 ppm; IR:
n
¼2924, 2860,
1535, 1500, 1370, 1248, 1030, 735 cmꢁ1; MS (APCI) m/z: 327; HRMS
calcd for C20H27N2O2: 327.2073, found: 327.2064.
4.1.8. General procedure for RCM reaction (2/13). Diene 2 (225 mg,
1 equiv)and1,2-dichloroeethane(140 ml) wereintroducedin a flask
under argon. The mixture was heated at reflux and Grubbs catalyst
(second generation) (26.8 mg, 0.315 mmol, 0.05 equiv) was added.
The IC50 values(concentrationcausingahalf-maximalinhibitionof
control specific binding) and Hill coefficients (nH) were determined by
non-linear regression analysis of the competition curves generated
with mean replicate values using Hill equation curve fitting Y¼Dþ
[(AꢁD)/(1þ(C/C50
)
nH)], where Y¼specific binding, D¼minimum spe-
After 24 h,
a second fraction of Grubbs catalyst (13.4 mg,
0.158 mmol, 0.025 equiv) was added. After 24 h, the mixture was
cooled down to room temperature and potassium isocyanoacetate20
(39 mg) was added. After 1 h of stirring, the solvent was evaporated.
The crude product was purified by flash chromatography over silica
with cyclohexane/ethyl acetate 75/25 as eluent.
cific binding, A¼maximum specific binding, C¼compound concen-
tration, C50¼IC50, and nH¼slope factor. This analysis was performed
using a software developed at CEREP (Hill software) and validated by
comparison with data generated by the commercial software
SigmaPlotÒ 4.0 for WindowsÒ (Ó 1997 by SPSS Inc.).
The inhibition constants (Ki) were calculated using the Cheng
Prusoff equation(Ki¼IC50/(1þ(L/KD)), where L¼concentration of
radioligand in the assay, and KD¼affinity of the radioligand for the
receptor).
4.1.9. General procedure for hydrogenation (13/1). Pd/C 10% cat-
alyst (24 mg, 0.0222 mmol, 0.05 equiv) was added to a solution of
imidazole 13 (145 mg, 0.442 mmol, 1 equiv) in 20 mL of a 1:1
mixture of ethanol and ethyl acetate. The resulting suspension was
degassed by means of a flow of argon for 30 min and then stirred
under hydrogen atmosphere for 3 h at room temperature. The
suspension was filtered through a Celite pad, washed with ethyl
acetate and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product
was purified by flash chromatography using cyclohexane/ethyl
acetate 70/30 as eluent.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Fonds de la Recherche Scien-
tifiquedFNRS (F.R.S.-FNRS) and the Region Bruxelles-Capitale. R.R.
and J.M.-B. are Chercheurs qualifiés F.R.S.-FNRS and R.K. is a director
of research of the F.R.S.-FNRS.
4.1.10. Characterization of 21-methyl-8,17-dioxa-19,21-diazatricyclo
[16.2.1.02,7]henicosa-1(20),2,4,6,18-pentaene (1a). Colorless oil;
yield: 23.2 mg were obtained from 40 mg of 13a (19% over the two
Supplementary data
Full spectroscopic data, for all derivatives, are included as Sup-
plementary data. Supplementary data associated with this article
steps); Purity¼84%; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3):
¼7.33 (td, J¼8.2,
d
1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (dd, J¼7.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (dt, J¼7.4, 1.5 Hz, 1H),
6.94 (d, J¼8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.62 (s, 1H), 5.97e5.71 (m, 2H); 5.20e4.94
(m, 4H); 4.46 (t, J¼6.7 Hz, 2H), 3.97 (t, J¼6.6 Hz, 2H), 3.24 (s, 3H),
2.61e2.58 (m, 2H), 2.10e2.03 (m, 2H), 1.79e1.70 (m, 2H),
References and notes
1.52e1.42 ppm (m, 2H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3):
d
¼156.9, 153.3,
1. For some reviews on imidazole synthesis, see: (a) Kamijo, S.; Yamamoto, Y.
Chem. Asian J. 2007, 2, 568e578; (b) Bellina, F.; Cauteruccio, S.; Rossi, R. Tetra-
hedron 2007, 63, 4571e4624; (c) Du, H.; He, Y.; Sivappa, R.; Lovely, C. J. Synlett
2006, 965e992; (d) Grimmett, M. R. Imidazole and Benzimidazole Synthesis;
Academic.: San Diego, California, 1997; (e) Grimmett, M. R. In Comprehensive
138.5, 134.4, 132.1, 129.6, 126.6, 121.7, 120.8, 120.0, 117.2, 114.9, 112.2,
68.45, 68.41, 33.7, 33.4, 29.5, 28.7, 25.4 ppm; IR (on fumaric salt):
n
¼2927, 2854, 1715, 1531, 1452, 1269, 1248, 1165, 1072, 754 cmꢁ1
;